The Leaguer
Avenger
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2004
- Messages
- 13,801
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Is it a cool spoiler?
I would laugh for three weeks straight if that were true.The Leaguer said:Maybe he's drunk.
Tropico said:Or hasn't gotten any in a while. Jessica left him hangin'.
I don't see him being *****y here. Maria Hill? Oh, HUGE *****e. But Tony? He's doing what he thinks is right, and I think JMS and Millar have done a great job of showing that. Tony isn't sitting in Stark Tower on a massive throne plotting world domination; he's trying to continue helping the world while working alongside SHIELD.TheCorpulent1 said:It would still be lame, though. Honestly, look at the Armor Wars and some of the other stuff he pulled on the West Coast Avengers. This really isn't that far out of character for him, especially given how the registration act is polarizing everything. Tony's always been a colossal *****e.
SpideyInATree said:I don't read Thunderbolts. I'm guessing that they break out Bullseye or something, or someone does.
If they do, that's poop because Daredevil is freakin' awesome. You've got Kingpin, Hammerhead, Black Tarantula, Bullseye, and Daredevil all in the same prison. Talk about kick ass drama. It's like Daredevil: Oz.
Artistsean said:I think the villians helping, whihc would be a good idea to add that in, will eventually blow up in the face of the government and only strengthen the superheroes case.
the extremis enhancement COULD be warping tony's personality at thatEric Draven said:Could it be Extremis?
Unfortunately yes. Take a look at who is the writer: Mark Millar, who is definetly a liberal. An Irish one by the way. Or is he Scottish, I can't remember.daveswb said:Is this turning into a "The Government is Evil" Story?
No, the Pro-Registration just wants more Thunderbolts. Now that the superhero community is split right down the middle, the bad guys would be a problem. And there's a lot of bad guys. If you convert some of the bad guys into Thunderbolts/somewhat good guys then the problem of bad guys would be lifted somewhat.Think about it? Recruiting bad guys?
Having heroes reveal them selves in public (yet they don't have to). which will only lead to negative repurcussions, they already promoting Spidey is going to get some bad beat downs for taking off his mask.
The fact that they wouldn't take Spider-man's testimony into record because he had on a mask.
Hinting at the fact that the event was planned and not an accident.
Also the fact that no one is concentrating on the actual cause of the event and really going after the guy that did it. Well one hero is, why the rest of the avengers aren't going after him is beyond me.
I also found it odd that they made the presidnet actually look like the president. I know they ocassionally do this, but in most cases they artist does this for the purpose of making a political statement.
The story is definetly a political statement. It feels like a commentary on the war in Iraq and how people become divided over what is going on. Look at Sue and Reed Richards. A lot of husbands and wives disagreed on the war.
I guess what I'm saying is I don't have an issue with using comics to make a political statment. That is what art is for a lot of times. What Im against is making the characters act so contridictary to thier normal behavior just to make the statement bigger.
TheCorpulent1 said:I might drop the Spider-Man books altogether. Having Peter finally, intentionally kill someone after 40 years of steering clear of that, on top of the fact that his stories have been sucking in general lately, would be the straw that broke the camel's back for me. I'd pull out, go into Spidey withdrawal like I did for the Clone Saga, and come back when things are better.
3dman27 said:the extremis enhancement COULD be warping tony's personality at that
hippie_hunter said:Unfortunately yes. Take a look at who is the writer: Mark Millar, who is definetly a liberal. An Irish one by the way. Or is he Scottish, I can't remember.