SuperMonkey
Sidekick
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2007
- Messages
- 1,709
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
I like how Church and State are still "seperated" when professors try to get involved in student's religous beliefs. 
-- FunBob

-- FunBob
Well SWUI is not listed as a "public" institution on a particular college website I just visited (it's not listed as private either), so it may not fall under "The separation of church and state". While free speech is protected, in a private institution the ability to hire and fire at will is also protected. So if his boss wants him out of there for "denigration of the Bible", unfortunately that's his right.I like how Church and State are still "seperated" when professors try to get involved in student's religous beliefs.
-- FunBob
Why, you should be fired and banned for suggesting such a thing!
That's what that damnable heathen professor said to his poor students too!
says who?I always find it funny that people think that Revelations is literally about the end of days, when literally it isn't. It's literally about the Fall of Babylon, which has come and gone.
Well this is just too precious, Cristo is now trying to convince us that a rabbit eating its own **** is the same as chewing the cud. Oh and Cristo, I hope that there would be no such thing as "close enough" with the all powerful creator of the universe. At this point your forced with two explanations, either the Bible is not the divine word of god or god needs to hire an editor.
Wait a minute...I said that it was essentially the same back then or SIMILAR enough to be defined as the same. Now, it's defined differently, but back then, it was similar enough to all fall under "chewing the cud".
Evidence. Like fitting all the animals of the earth on one boat.
Riiiiiight.
![]()
![]()
![]()
What the teacher said was really quite true.What the teacher said was really quite stupid.
It's perfectly valid to say that it can't be taken as literal truth because that much we know 100% empirically for a fact.....because first of all, it doesn't PURPORT to be intended to be taken literally in it's entirety (big, bigI somewhat agree with his statement...but i'm not going to be stupid enough to say that, and as a educated person...f#ck it, as any person, that the entire Bible shouldn't be taken as literal truth.
Wrong. This is a double standard because professors constantly, every single day teach with opinion, and bias, things that can't be proven.He is an authority figure and a teacher...he can't prove that the Bible isn't true, so he should teach things in an unbiased fashion and not start spouting crap that he can't prove.
He gave his opinion, and professors are free to do that, or should be.You don't have to teach that it's true you idiot...so don't say stupid crap like that.
It has to do with how disingenuous Christians are about the fact that they really do want to force their beliefs on everyone else.i don't think his firing had to do with his first amendment rights here...i think it had to do with making and idiotic blanket statement.
Says Biblican historians and the people who wrote it. The entire book is chock full of references to important places and architecture in Babylon. Heck, even the Beast itself seems akin to certain statues unearthed in the city. Top it off with the fact that it mentions the "****e of Babylon" and prophecizes it's fall, and you have your answer right there. Anything further is interpretation, usually with personal bias thrown in.says who?
Why, you should be fired and banned for suggesting such a thing!
That's what that damnable heathen professor said to his poor students too!