Daredevil 2

Asteroid-Man

Avenger
Joined
Sep 24, 2005
Messages
18,007
Reaction score
1
Points
33
Is it realy going to happen? If it is, it better be quick! 'cause if Ben and Jen break up, they wont work together. Unless thats whats keeping them from signing up. They said they both looked forward to working with each on Daredevil 2, but the plot for Daredevil 2 doesnt include Elektra. Also, there is NO word on it. It happend with X-Men 3 and it came out in a year. Could this miracle be pulled off with Daredevil??? Discuss..
 
Asteroid-Man said:
Is it realy going to happen? If it is, it better be quick! 'cause if Ben and Jen break up, they wont work together. Unless thats whats keeping them from signing up. They said they both looked forward to working with each on Daredevil 2, but the plot for Daredevil 2 doesnt include Elektra. Also, there is NO word on it. It happend with X-Men 3 and it came out in a year. Could this miracle be pulled off with Daredevil??? Discuss..

Yeah, and from what I hear, the result of X3 "coming out in a year" is a mediocre film that doesn't live up to its potential. And if they do another DD movie (which I definitely hope they do!) I hope they do it without JMS or Affleck.

As long as Rothman is calling the shots, I'd just as soon they left DD alone til the rights revert back to Marvel.
 
:eek: You think X3 is bad?! You want to continue DD by changing the main character??!!! WHAT!
 
Yeah, I hope they bring on Daredevil 2. The director's cut was just awesome. It would be great to see Colin Farell back as Bullseye or better yet...COOLIO!
 
Love a proper sequel with the whole cast. But alas I know it won't happen. And it won't get made until Marvel gets the rights back anyway.
 
unfortunately daredevil 2 probably isn't gonna happen :( , at least not for a while
~®®§
 
I cant see a Daredevil 2 happening for a number of years.
 
I hope it happens eventually. Jennifer Garner said months ago that Affleck had told her that it was still in development stages so I think there's still hope it can happen. I think the biggest obstacle to it would be to find the right story and if Fox will let them do Daredevil like it's supposed to be without having to market it to kids...
 
Fox will never do anything with the DD property. Marvel would have to get the rights back. I know they've been trying to get them back earlier. Let's hope they succed.
 
Bruce_Wayne29 said:
I hope it happens eventually. Jennifer Garner said months ago that Affleck had told her that it was still in development stages so I think there's still hope it can happen. I think the biggest obstacle to it would be to find the right story and if Fox will let them do Daredevil like it's supposed to be without having to market it to kids...
Um.. daredevil was rated PG-13 in US, 14A in Canada, 13 ANS(years)+ in France and 13 in England. Where do you see kids? And what about the sex scene? That wasnt advertised for kids either:mad: It was NEVER made for kids. They made 2 advertisements for kids but not the movie
 
If they make this movie it should not have Elektra in it and it should not be directed by Mark Steven Johnson.


And it should be a very high pg13 or a mild R
 
I wonder if Avi Arad's resignation will affect Daredevil 2, because he seemed to be the strongest supporter of making a sequel once the rights revert back to Marvel.
 
Ronny Shade said:
If they make this movie it should not have Elektra in it and it should not be directed by Mark Steven Johnson.


And it should be a very high pg13 or a mild R

I really don't think Mark Steven Johnson is that bad of a director, especially since everyone seems to love the Directors Cut of the movie. It's just when the studio steps in and makes lame demands (PG-13 rating, more Elektra, less Daredevil) that the movie ends up sucking.
 
If there is a god in heaven I hope not. The first was a pile of youknowwhat. Why make us suffer again?
 
Daredevil is one of Marvel's top 10 characters for sure. They will eventually get the rights back, and I'm sure five years from now, DD will look like a better prospect than some of the other films mentioned in the Paramount deal.

I think the famous characters like Iron Man, Daredevil, Captain America, and Hulk are a much safer bet for Marvel than unknowns like Shang Chi or Power Kids.
 
The only thing wrong with Daredevil was they released the wrong cut to theatres.

I hope they hurry up and make a sequel because I think the Directors cut is one of the very best superhero movies ever made. Bring on all new villians and get started!!
 
"The only thing wrong with Daredevil was they released the wrong cut to theatres"

And the release date, they should have just held on to it till summer.
 
Dynasty said:
"The only thing wrong with Daredevil was they released the wrong cut to theatres"

And the release date, they should have just held on to it till summer.
A summer already filled with X-men 2, The Hulk, Terminator 3, Pirates of The Carribbean, and Finding Nemo?

Ummm no.
 
I assume u mean X2, i say why not. One marvel movie in may, one in june, one in late july or August, i can tell you right now it would have made more money, so why not?
 
like if 3 in a year isn't a big deal then why cant it be 3 within 4 months?
 
GoldGoblin said:
I hope it doesn't.
I totally agree :up:

I just don´t know if you were joking or not, or that you even have the same reasons as i do, but, i can´t see a reason why DD II should be made.

No matter how many people liked it, and it doesn´t matter how many people loved the director´s cut, but a movie that tells 20 years of a character in under 120 minutes is just plain ridiculous.
I don´t hate the movie, but it´s, IMO, nothing more than ok.
You guys really want a sequel to a movie where Kingpin, Bullseye and Elektra were just cardboard caricatures of the real characters?
And i don´t mean the acting...but, in Elektra´s case, she is no more than 40 minutes in the movie...and then she dies, you never really get into the character, you just know that she was a chick that was in love with DD and wanted to avenge her father´s dead, and that she died at the end.

My call, wait a few years and restart the damn thing, make a trilogy and kill Elektra in the LAST ONE
 
Dynasty said:
I assume u mean X2, i say why not. One marvel movie in may, one in june, one in late july or August, i can tell you right now it would have made more money, so why not?

No it wouldn't have. It would've been lost in the shuffle and dominated pretty badly.

X-men 2 did very well because it basically started off the summer hot.

The Hulk was a huge disappointment.

Daredevil was able to make $102 million in the US even being released in Feb. that's not too terrible.
 
It made back it's budget plus a little more.

And hell, it could've made even more if the superior Director's Cut was the version released in theaters.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"