pyromaniac
Sidekick
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2003
- Messages
- 3,655
- Reaction score
- 9
- Points
- 58
Truth is no matter who they get to direct Magneto. It's not going to be successful for them. People don't go to X-Men to see a tedious in depth character analysis. Most people don't want to learn about Magneto's past. They just want to see him rip bridges up and slam them back down.
In other worlds, character development is good, but this film is all about character development and people do not want to see just character development in an X-Men film.
I would have expected more from you, Bill.
Are you generalising or going by on the last Xmen film?
It's a bit smarmy to say that as long as one half containing action of the film is favoured over the other half containing characterisation or vice versa, it must mean it's what people want!
If Magneto is ripping up bridges at all, we should at least need to see why he's doing that in the first place. It would at first lend itself to motive and then to a psychological source, but that's if it can be dug deeper beyond than mere motive and momentum of the story itself, to the point of relevance of course. Not convenience. Not bungling. Not anything that is touted as an averse impact or one that gets in the way of story, and that goes for both action and character.
I'm curious though. Was the first Xmen film more of a character study than anything else, which is why it's the least-grossing film in the trilogy? I suppose it depends on how you like to brush your strokes but again, I'd like to think that character development is only as meaningful as action itself: in other words, co-existing in a film that centres around a semi-antagonist with a Holocaust past that defines not who he is (a megolomaniac with a deep seated modus operandi) and not his attitudes towards the world (reactive/proactive behaviour upon whom he deems as inferior, intolerant or prejudiced on his kind) but also his superpowered feats (he'll not attack anyone WITHOUT reason, I should say!).
Balance is key, and I like to think that the intellectual viewer would want the film to be elevated above blockbuster status or character study. Of course, note intellectual being the operative word.