BvS David S. Goyer IS the Script Writer!

How do you feel about Goyer writing the script for the first Superman Batman film

  • His work on MOS was VERY GOOD. He'll do GREAT.

  • His work on MOS was OKAY. I am Skecptical.

  • His work on MOS was POOR. I feel dread.

  • He NEEDS Affleck's help and guidance to deliver a great script

  • His work on MOS was VERY GOOD. He'll do GREAT.

  • His work on MOS was OKAY. I am Skecptical.

  • His work on MOS was POOR. I feel dread.

  • He NEEDS Affleck's help and guidance to deliver a great script

  • His work on MOS was VERY GOOD. He'll do GREAT.

  • His work on MOS was OKAY. I am Skecptical.

  • His work on MOS was POOR. I feel dread.

  • He NEEDS Affleck's help and guidance to deliver a great script

  • His work on MOS was VERY GOOD. He'll do GREAT.

  • His work on MOS was OKAY. I am Skecptical.

  • His work on MOS was POOR. I feel dread.

  • He NEEDS Affleck's help and guidance to deliver a great script


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
This is true. So if it's a business, and the film was such a failure, reason would have it that WB would never hire the same person again. Right? Because the point of making movies is to get a return on the product, to make a profit. If the script was so, so, so awful, WB would have bought out Goyer and Snyder's contracts, and found someone else -- or flat-out hired someone to assist in writing the screenplay.

They didn't. Which means that they were pleased with the results, they are pleased with the future plans for the DCU, and they want to continue forward with the same creative team.

What does that tell you?

Out of a reductionist world, there are many other factors attached, like how much more they would pay for someone else, how much time they have to find one, and how could they be sure they are the right person for it.

In the real world, we see Goyer failing in the same departments over and over.
 
Well, Snyder was proven. So was Goyer. And he disappointed me.

Nolan was unproven. So was Shane Black.


I wasn't disappointed at all.

Nolan did Ok but not as well for me as for others. He started really strong but ended weaker.

Shane Black tanked for me worse that I could possibly imagine. IM 3 disappointed me more that you can probably imagine because of all the good will the MCU had built up for me until then.

I'm really good with Snyder/Goyer.
 
Yeah Jonathan says Clark needs to be ready? Ready for what exactly? To be handed a costume? For an alien invasion to force him out? Or just the support of his biological father who encourages him not to hide?
Perhaps this is just because of Smallville, but there is no reason Clark can't help people and keep his identity a secret, perhaps if he stopped saving people and then standing around to look pretty and pose.
 
Well if we throw out the over-the-top conversations about an alien revealing himself and if the world can handle it and we throw out all of the terrible jokes and terrible little romantic lines between Louis and Clark and the 'welcome to the planet' line and the 'release the world engine'...yeah its pretty solid dialogue. In all seriousness though, most of Zod's dialogue was pretty cool, but that may have just been Shannon being a badass.

I agree with most of your post, but I ask again, what is wrong with "release the world engine" as a line of dialogue?
 
Yeah Jonathan says Clark needs to be ready? Ready for what exactly? To be handed a costume? For an alien invasion to force him out? Or just the support of his biological father who encourages him not to hide?
Perhaps this is just because of Smallville, but there is no reason Clark can't help people and keep his identity a secret, perhaps if he stopped saving people and then standing around to look pretty and pose.

I thought he meant ready to face the world. And no, I don't think a child CK would be. :o
 
The worst two lines of dialogue in the film, right after Lois and Clark first kiss,

Lois: Don't they say it all goes downhill after the first kiss?
Superman: I'm pretty sure that only applies to humans.

Now that I think about it, that is some historically bad dialogue.

1) Nobody says that it at all goes downhill after the first kiss. Where did Goyer come up with this cultural meme?
2) Lois should be attracted to Superman because he's human, not because he's an alien.
3) I'm not sure if it's supposed to be funny.

That is far, far worse than the harmless "release the world engine".
 
Kidder and Reeve's romance was so engaging and amusing. Adams and Cavill just smooched in the end with seemingly no motivation.
 
the worst part about the film was the kissing. it seemed forced. that's the one thing I'll agree with, with some here. i think it would have been better in the long run if they built up to it.
 
But but but Marvin and the Guard are going to write essay length responses to your judgment that the line was stupid. THERE'S DEEPER MEANING GODDAMMIT.

No there isn't. It was a **** line that wasn't alone in a film clogged with terrible dialogue, which consistently reminded me of the famous Harrison Ford quote.

You can type this ****, but you sure as hell can't say it.
 
ЯɘvlveR;26794303 said:
the worst part about the film was the kissing. it seemed forced. that's the one thing I'll agree with, with some here. i think it would have been better in the long run if they built up to it.

I'm okay with the kissing. It seemed like a fulfillment of base desires. They both felt like they would never see each other again. They were drunk, drunk on trauma. And I'm not even a romantic sap (my gut reaction was to save that stuff for sequels). As if 30 seconds of kissing would prevent Supes from going around and looking for survivors (and yes, I hope they totally retcon that bit for the sequel).

The killing was..too soon. Especially since Superman's ability to avoid causing death 98 or so percent of the time is what makes him different from many superheroes. But it was handled as well as it could be.

The actual fighting and Superman appearing callous. Yeah, there should have been a scene of Supes looking for people to save.

But people didn't really protest the JLU cartoon. Why protest now?

As for the tornado scene. It's as bad as most people say it is. It's like Goyer can't help but include at least one illogical moment in his movies.

"I'm not an executioner, Ducard. Now let me clumsily blow up your monastery to prove my point." :huh:
 
But but but Marvin and the Guard are going to write essay length responses to your judgment that the line was stupid. THERE'S DEEPER MEANING GODDAMMIT.

No there isn't. It was a **** line that wasn't alone in a film clogged with terrible dialogue, which consistently reminded me of the famous Harrison Ford quote.

You can type this ****, but you sure as hell can't say it.

Wow, and here I was browsing only during my sabbatical from these parts only to see my name come up.

In the future, you may want to avoid arguing against your own strawman, it's a fruitless endeavor.

The worst two lines of dialogue in the film, right after Lois and Clark first kiss,

Lois: Don't they say it all goes downhill after the first kiss?
Superman: I'm pretty sure that only applies to humans.

1) Nobody says that it at all goes downhill after the first kiss. Where did Goyer come up with this cultural meme?

Not everything is based on memes, then again, given the way our culture is going...

Perhaps the utterance is based on the greater and well accepted idea that SOMETIMES relationships go down hill after the initial spring of attraction. Not sure about your views on romance and relationships but if someone said something about the significance of "first dates", it would touch on the same idea if not more so.
Then again maybe Goyer(and this movies producers) just watched too many episodes of Married with Children:o

IMO the biggest enemy of this film is an audience that mixes misunderstanding to a lack of performance. It's not always the case but it is some of the time, which is a tragedy.

Onto this idea that the romance of this film compares badly to the original. First off, I do love how people will gladly mention the originals when they see an opportunity to slight MOS yet seemingly shy away from the originals when the full weight of the comparisons do little for their argument.(see superman 2).

It's my belief that half of the MOS criticism comes from a place of institutionalization. People just aren't looking at things clearly but rather simply seeing a difference and being off put by said difference. Here's an example. In the Donner verse it can be said that lois falls in love with a lie. From the minute she meets this superman character he is lying to her on a very significant level. And this is the greater romance? Moreover, when does this lois fall for this "superman?" Is it perhaps on the same day as every other woman on the planet fall for him? It was very much a "swooning" initial attraction. This point is driven even further when you look at her complete dismissal for this clark kent character. Is this really love?
Fair question and I'm not going to assume to have the answer.

Now to ask similar questions of MOS.
Did lois fall in "love" with a lie? When did lois fall for this guy? Why did she fall for this guy?
-I do know that he shared with her perhaps his deepest secret in that he let his dad die and she then displayed a swell of emotion. That kinda stuff goes along way with building trust and feelings.
-I do know that lois took this mans secrets as her own. That kinda stuff goes along way to building trust and feelings.(seriously folks)
-I do know that their first meeting was him saving her from death with an incredibly invasive and painful surgery and before he did so he asked her to trust him, anyone that watches greys anatomy might tell you that kinda stuff goes along way to building trust and feelings.
-I do know that both of them, together pretty much handed themselves in to certain death for the fate of the planet whilst holding hands, before which clark thanked her for believing in him. That kinda stuff goes along way to building trust and feelings.
-I do know lois met and has a working relationship with two of clarks key parents. That kinda stuff goes along way to buil.....
-I do know there was that tearful embrace there when clark needed his moma the most. That kinda stuff goes along way.....
Lastly, I know that lois knows who superman is, perhaps more than anyone else not named mommy. After the first meeting the two don't have a lie between them. In fact, Lois is the one person that knows that clark has dedicated almost his entire adult human life up to that point to being a thankless hero with no friends and a saddened son. What does Kidder know about superman after their famed first interview?

Coming from someone that thinks the kiss was badly placed(for the most part), anyone that thinks the romance in this film fails in comparison to the original sadly mistaken I think.
What's more people kiss all the time, it's called the dating process. Having memory wiping sex that leads to kids out of wedlock is something odd though I must admit.

I for one think it, like the rest of MOS's premise, the superhero romance was put through the "grounding in reality" filter.
No doubt sending many superman fans in to bouts of confusion.

I commend mark waid for getting though Birthright without a kiss, then again, he wasn't making a hollywood picture.

2) Lois should be attracted to Superman because he's human, not because he's an alien.
come again:huh:

Kidder and Reeve's romance was so engaging and amusing. Adams and Cavill just smooched in the end with seemingly no motivation.
duly noted.
 
Wow, and here I was browsing only during my sabbatical from these parts only to see my name come up.

In the future, you may want to avoid arguing against your own strawman, it's a fruitless endeavor.

But beating up on you is so much fun. :fhm:

Onto this idea that the romance of this film compares badly to the original. First off, I do love how people will gladly mention the originals when they see an opportunity to slight MOS yet seemingly shy away from the originals when the full weight of the comparisons do little for their argument.(see superman 2).

This. "Look at how awesome the original was! Oh wait, Superman killed Zod (but I didn't like that part, so it doesn't count)"

MOS was a reboot, not a remake. I wish people would remember that.

It's my belief that half of the MOS criticism comes from a place of institutionalization. People just aren't looking at things clearly but rather simply seeing a difference and being off put by said difference. Here's an example. In the Donner verse it can be said that lois falls in love with a lie. From the minute she meets this superman character he is lying to her on a very significant level. And this is the greater romance? Moreover, when does this lois fall for this "superman?" Is it perhaps on the same day as every other woman on the planet fall for him? It was very much a "swooning" initial attraction. This point is driven even further when you look at her complete dismissal for this clark kent character. Is this really love?
Fair question and I'm not going to assume to have the answer.

The off-putting thing about Superman for me has always been the "love connection" of Lois and Superman, and Lois and Clark. I hate the lies, and how we have to have Lois be a little stupid to not put things together, and how Clark isn't loved right away by her, and....eh. It's always been forced and contrived for me.

Now to ask similar questions of MOS.
Did lois fall in "love" with a lie? When did lois fall for this guy? Why did she fall for this guy?
-I do know that he shared with her perhaps his deepest secret in that he let his dad die and she then displayed a swell of emotion. That kinda stuff goes along way with building trust and feelings.
-I do know that lois took this mans secrets as her own. That kinda stuff goes along way to building trust and feelings.(seriously folks)
-I do know that their first meeting was him saving her from death with an incredibly invasive and painful surgery and before he did so he asked her to trust him, anyone that watches greys anatomy might tell you that kinda stuff goes along way to building trust and feelings.
-I do know that both of them, together pretty much handed themselves in to certain death for the fate of the planet whilst holding hands, before which clark thanked her for believing in him. That kinda stuff goes along way to building trust and feelings.
-I do know lois met and has a working relationship with two of clarks key parents. That kinda stuff goes along way to buil.....
-I do know there was that tearful embrace there when clark needed his moma the most. That kinda stuff goes along way.....
Lastly, I know that lois knows who superman is, perhaps more than anyone else not named mommy. After the first meeting the two don't have a lie between them. In fact, Lois is the one person that knows that clark has dedicated almost his entire adult human life up to that point to being a thankless hero with no friends and a saddened son. What does Kidder know about superman after their famed first interview?

Stop talking crazy, Marvin. You act as if mutual trust and being on equal footing in a relationship are important to having a meaningful relationship.
 
I liked that Supes was so upset that Lois was dead that he was compelled to do something he was forbidden to do; but then you think about the entire relationship in the movie and you think "why did he do this?" As Superman he had one night of conversation with her and as Clark they barely interact, yet somehow by the end of the movie he is so in love with her that he spins the earth backwards!
 
I liked that Supes was so upset that Lois was dead that he was compelled to do something he was forbidden to do; but then you think about the entire relationship in the movie and you think "why did he do this?" As Superman he had one night of conversation with her and as Clark they barely interact, yet somehow by the end of the movie he is so in love with her that he spins the earth backwards!

That's what you call bad writing.

For some reason, I feel compelled to share this, even though it doesn't have much to do with the conversation at hand:

tumblr_m04ynuBzSP1qk2k42o1_400.png
 
But beating up on you is so much fun. :fhm:
I wouldn't say he was beating up on me, but I am flattered to be mentioned. It means I'm on his list:yay:

And along side The Guard no less. That guy and I have long history on these parts. I was a young buck when he would school me left and right... So it has come to this lol.

Stop talking crazy, Marvin. You act as if mutual trust and being on equal footing in a relationship are important to having a meaningful relationship.
Like I keep saying, this is just one of those films that could have benefited from an even keeled audience. Instead of the institution.

What a different day this would have been had MOS been the first anyone had ever seen of this property. It may have even gone up 5 points on the RT chart.

I liked that Supes was so upset that Lois was dead that he was compelled to do something he was forbidden to do; but then you think about the entire relationship in the movie and you think "why did he do this?" As Superman he had one night of conversation with her and as Clark they barely interact, yet somehow by the end of the movie he is so in love with her that he spins the earth backwards!
Superman was madly in love with lois in the donnerverse. Couldn't tell you why but...he was.
BisonOfCourse.jpg

...sounds like what people consider to be a "Goyer move".
:whatever:
3qiood.jpg
 
Last edited:
Goyer's script sucked. Snyder's direction sucked. The end.
 
I agree with most of your post, but I ask again, what is wrong with "release the world engine" as a line of dialogue?

It was way too Saturday morning cartoonish. He couldn't have come up with a better name than the 'world engine?' . Maybe it's the delivery of the line that has me against this line because I admit world engine isn't much better than 'death star'.
 
It was way too Saturday morning cartoonish. He couldn't have come up with a better name than the 'world engine?' . Maybe it's the delivery of the line that has me against this line because I admit world engine isn't much better than 'death star'.

It might have been better if he said "Release the kraken!"

Or, "So, it has come to this. Let fly the world-shaping engine so that it may create for us a new Krypton! Mwahahahahahaha!"

Or maybe "Release the world engine" is really just ok. Shannon wasn't too silly with that line, I didn't think.
 
You're not on my list, Marvin. Contrary to that I like that you've thought the movie through so much. However, as a result of this you're entirely convinced in your views and hence present them in an extremely condescending manner. In fact, you just proved my point with that response. :)
 
You're not on my list, Marvin. Contrary to that I like that you've thought the movie through so much. However, as a result of this you're entirely convinced in your views and hence present them in an extremely condescending manner. In fact, you just proved my point with that response. :)

I've got some conviction yes. Wouldn't say I'm entirely convinced of anything. I'm open to other peoples views, not sure I'd hang around here if otherwise.

As for condescending manner, wasn't my intent. Sorry if you felt talked down to. I do try and add some personality and moxy to some of my forum exploits. Especially where I deem appropriate, such as posts with my name in them.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,381
Messages
22,094,677
Members
45,889
Latest member
Starman68
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"