Day of the Dead (Remake)

Advanced Dark

Avenger
Joined
Nov 17, 2005
Messages
17,587
Reaction score
4
Points
31
Are you guys looking forward to this film? I am. I really enjoyed the Dawn of the Dead remake and while it wasn't as good as the original...the original Day of the Dead was awful so the remake can only get better. The few pics that popped up on Fangoria leave me very excited!

2720_article.jpg


September 11: Exclusive first DAY OF THE DEAD remake pics
Screenwriter Jeffrey (FINAL DESTINATION) Reddick gave Fango a look at a zombie victim (above) and some of the ghouls themselves (below) from the DAY OF THE DEAD remake that recently wrapped in Bulgaria. “These are exclusive first pics from the film,” Reddick tells us. “I’m not counting those crappy makeup tests that found their way on-line.” Steve (HOUSE) Miner directed the new DAY, with Ving Rhames (from the 2003 DAWN remake, but playing Captain Rhodes here), Mena Suvari, Nick Cannon, Michael Welch, Annalynne McCord and Stark Sands starring; NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD 3D’s Dean and Starr Jones created the makeup FX. Look for Reddick’s exclusive two-art DAY journal, covering the project’s evolution and his own stint as a ghoul, on this site beginning this week. —Michael Gingold
DAYDEADREMAKE1STPICSNEWS2.jpg

DAYDEADREMAKE1STPICSNEWS3.jpg
 
The original Day of the Dead is a good flick. Although the acting was bad, but it had the story and definitely the over the top gore. I'm hoping the remake will follow Romero's original vision he had for the movie. He talks about it on the 3 or 4 disk (I can't remember) DVD and they show some story boards of it. I'm looking forward to seeing this in theaters as I have been liking the zombie movies within the past few years.
 
The gore was great in the original, but most of the zombie make-up pretty much sucked, I'm sure if Tom Savini had a bigger budget to have spent on things back then the zombies would have turned out a whole lot better.
 
^ The general concept was cool on that Island and some of the scenes were horrifying but it was lacking. I loved how they remade Dawn and hope they can do at least the same quality for this one. I'm happy Ving Rhames is back.
 
It baffles me that so many people hate Day, which I thought was the second best in the series, after Dawn. And no, I am not looking forward to this.
 
I'll most likely see it. I thought the original was okay.
 
I'll see it. I loved Romero's original movies, and I loved the remake of Dawn, so I'm looking forward to this.
 
Hahaha, people talking s*** about original Day are just not living on my planet, at all, lol.
 
I hated the Dawn remake, and this is by that horrendous hack Steve Miner that butchered the Halloween franchise and acted proud of himself for it, so I'm counting on it being even worse.
 
I thought the original Day had some kickass ideas, but ultimately I sat there bored waiting for some gore.

Plus the 80s score needed to go. :(
 
^ That's how I felt. It wasn't fun. Dawn of the Dead was fun, and had loads of action. Day just kind of lagged. I don't mind slow movies as long as there's more to it.
 
i'm looking forward to it. i liked the original, i liked the dawn remake, therefor, blah blah blah...

yeah, i think it'll be okay.
 
2781_article.jpg


[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]My Week With the DEAD: Part One[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]By JEFFREY REDDICK[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Filming on the remake of DAY OF THE DEAD, which I scripted, finished in Bulgaria on September 5, and I’m back in the good old USA after fulfilling my geek-boy fantasy of being a zombie. In an industry where writers are considered the low men on the totem pole, you may wonder how I managed to nab my undead walk-on role. Well, I wish I could regale you with some sordid tale about being forced to sully myself by visiting the infamous casting couch…but it wasn’t anything so tawdry. I just nagged director Steve Miner and the producers until they said, “OK, if it’ll shut you up.”[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]I’m kidding. I actually made this desire known from the outset, and everyone was cool with it. I’ve tried to pull a Hitchcock and perform small cameos in all my films. My stint as a security guard in FINAL DESTINATION wound up on the cutting room floor, but I was a strapping doctor in TAMARA. These “blink and you’ll miss them” parts are my way of keeping in touch with my acting roots. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]The trip to Bulgaria is a 14-17-hour affair, depending on the connecting flight. It’s a long, boring trip which could really use some muthaf**kin' snakes, or other rowdy reptiles, to liven things up. The country itself is interesting, to say the least; while the region is fairly poor, the people are hard-working and extremely nice. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]When I arrive in Bulgaria, there’s a message waiting from Steve. They’ve shuffled the shooting schedule, so everyone has the day off. Steve has been working his arse off and has taken a much-needed mini-vacation. So I’ll catch up with him later—but, being the ever-intrepid writer, I head over to the production office to visit the set and watch dailies. It’s a six-week shoot, and Steve has been filming most of the script sequentially. This is really helpful for the actors, because they can clearly chart the emotional course of their characters.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]The film is being lensed on two huge soundstages, along with numerous real exterior locations. I get a tour and am amazed that they built so many locations to scale. The bunker is a massive set, housed in an old Olympic-sized pool. It has several large rooms, as well as a network of corridors and catacombs that snake on forever. I’m tempted to take some snapshots, but since I just arrived, I don’t want to whip out the camera just yet. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Next, I settle in to look at the dailies. After several hours of viewing fun, I interrupt Steve’s vacation to call him and tell him how great the film looks. Steve’s got a strong vision for DAY OF THE DEAD, and he’s really knocking it out of the park. Patrick Cady, the cinematographer, has given the movie a gritty, realistic veneer that makes you feel like you’re a part of the action, instead of just watching it. But I think the folks in the production office are getting a little sick of me. They thought I was only going to watch a few dailies, but I’ve pored over all of them. I’d better pack things up. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]But now, my excitement at getting my ghoul on is really high, because the FX look great. The makeup team consists of Dean Jones, Brian Penikas, Michael Mosher, Ken Niederbaumer and Jennifer Mann (whose collective credits include such films as PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN, JEEPERS CREEPERS, STAR TREK and FEAST). The zombies are gruesome, realistic and disgusting. I also check out several of the kill scenes, and I’m happy to report that flesh is ripped, blood flies and steaming entrails flow. The film is a hard R; hopefully, the ratings board will let us keep the more intense stuff. If not, that’s why God made DVDs.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]The following day I arrive on set, where Steve greets me. Despite the grueling shoot, he’s full of energy. He’s as giddy as a schoolgirl—a manly schoolgirl—as he takes me to his trailer and shows me an edit of one particularly harrowing scene, involving actor Ian (WHITE NOISE) McNeice. The scene works great on both a horrific and emotional level. Steve has insisted from the beginning that this movie be about characters and story first; he’s also one of the rare directors who really takes the time to work with the actors, and it shows in their strong performances. One thing I hate in horror films is when characters are terrorized in one scene, and in the next they’re all cheery like nothing’s going on. That’s not the case in this film. The sense of terror and dread are constant. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Since I’m not working until later, I decided to get on-line and check out some of the Internet sites that are discussing DAY OF THE DEAD. Let’s see, there’s some really intelligent discussions…some interesting ideas/thoughts…some crazy complaining…posters personally tearing each other apart…random death threats. Hmmmm…maybe this Internet thing wasn’t such a good idea. Actually, it’s great to see the fans’ excitement (even if some of that excitement involves folks wishing unspeakable death and torment on the cast and crew for daring to touch a classic Romero film).[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]But what the hell, I’m jet-lagged and not one to shy away from a heated debate, so let’s jump right in.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]I get the subtle hint that a lot of people are sick of remakes. I can’t say I blame them. At worst, they’re cheap grabs to make a quick buck. But the public’s appetite for remakes is strong, as is evident by the box-office numbers. As a horror nut, I’ve seen most of the recent genre reduxes. Some suck, but several of them have delivered—TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE, THE HILLS HAVE EYES and DAWN OF THE DEAD being among the good ones. The plus side of these updates is that they can introduce a new generation of filmgoers to classic movies. We can only hope that the people making them know the genre and respect the originals. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]When I was first offered the DAY remake, I was hesitant. Now, I have to admit that of the DEAD films, I personally feel that NIGHT and DAWN are the strongest. With these two films, George A. Romero got to make the films he wanted, but his DAY was hindered by the fact that the financing fell through at the last minute. He has stated that he was forced to abandon his large-scale movie and quickly rewrite it so that the majority of the film took place in one location…the underground bunker. George went on to include a lot of the excised plot and themes in LAND OF THE DEAD. So just using his unproduced script wasn’t an option—plus, the rights weren’t available.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]But my initial trepidation started to fade when I found out that Steve was directing. I’ve been a die-hard horror fan, and Fango reader, since the tender age of 13. Steve has directed some of my favorite genre films, FRIDAY THE 13TH PART 2, HOUSE, WARLOCK and HALLOWEEN: H20. As a writer, the chance to work with him was a dream come true. After meeting him several times, and seeing his passion and desire to make a frightening horror film that wasn’t just a carbon copy of the original, I decided to come aboard. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]The first thing Steve and I had to come up with was an approach for the film. We knew we were going to get flak no matter what we did. People immediately started screaming that we were going to go the OMEN route and do a scene-by-scene redux. Others complained that we were going to stray. I saw the horrendous flogging that Zack Snyder received before the new DAWN came out, so I was kind of prepared. Personally, I thought the DAWN remake was a damn good movie. I also consider the first DAWN a great film. They’re two separate movies, and they both succeeded in scaring their respective audiences. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]DAY is considered a classic by many devotees, and we weren’t going to be arrogant enough to think that we could “out-Romero” Romero. You want to be respectful of the original film and the fans. But Steve and I are genre fans ourselves, and we decided that since LAND covered a lot of what Romero wanted to do with DAY, we would take the themes and elements from the original and reimagine them. I liken it to the ULTIMATE line of Marvel comics. They take the classic characters, stories and themes and present them in different ways. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]The remake takes place in 24 hours…a literal day of the dead. The story follows a small band of civilians, scientists and military personal as they struggle to work together and survive a zombie outbreak. The survivors seek safety in an old, abandoned military bunker, unaware that an even greater danger lurks inside. With the remake, we wanted to take a page from George’s unproduced script and show who these characters were, and how they were affected, before they were trapped inside the bunker. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]The military and scientists are the central characters in the 1985 DAY. However, over the past decade, we’ve seen dozens of movies about hardened military warriors fighting the undead—from George’s films to 28 DAYS LATER and the RESIDENT EVIL flicks. Romero’s films all commented on the state of society at the time they were released. Given the current world climate, we thought it would be more interesting to see how a group of unseasoned military personnel would react when they’re forced to deal with something unthinkable. But this isn’t THE O.C. goes to war. There are a few teenaged characters, but lead actors Mena Suvari, Nick Cannon and Stark Sands are all in their late 20s (which is actually old if you look at the age of people currently fighting). The rest of the cast is rounded out by numerous, more seasoned actors and actresses, including lead Ving Rhames (from the DAWN remake!) as Captain Rhodes. It’s a true cross-section of characters. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]When finalizing the story elements, I was pleasantly surprised by the lack of interference from the producers. On many of my past films, we had executives breathing down our necks, offering suggestions that ranged from good to ludicrous. But the DAY producers trusted Steve and I to do our thing. And what the fans will get with this movie is a pure film unpolluted by the “too many chefs” syndrome. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Anyway, I’m gonna sign off for now. When I return, I’ll wrap up my adventures in zombieland, send you Fango readers a personal message from Steve “The Man” Miner and discuss the characters and cast…’cause I’ve been reading what you all think, and it’s not all wine and roses. Chomp!!![/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]TO BE CONTINUED[/FONT]


ddd​
 
Isn't this being made by those guys who made day of the dead2 which was crap.
 
I hate to be harsh, but this seems to be utter garbage.
 
Directed by the guy who did lake placid and written by the Final Destination guy not a good combination.
 
deathshead2 said:
Directed by the guy who did lake placid and written by the Final Destination guy not a good combination.

I think a chunk of my soul just burst into flames. :cmad:
 
I actually enjoyed the Dawn remake, but I don't really expect this remake to be anything than maginally entertaining. Unfortunately.
 
there has also been mention that the zombie character of Bub will now be a "vegetarian" and will refuse to eat human flesh....yeah great idea :whatever:
 
BIGGUN said:
there has also been mention that the zombie character of Bub will now be a "vegetarian" and will refuse to eat human flesh....yeah great idea :whatever:
Just when you thought, "How could this get any worse?"
 
^I liked what they did with Bub in the original. I thought it was an interesting take on a zombie.
 
Majik1387 said:
^I liked what they did with Bub in the original. I thought it was an interesting take on a zombie.


the original Bub was COOL...what they are doing to Bub in the remake (if its true) blows. add to fact they are using a young cast doesnt give me any confidence in this remake. how much does anyone wanna bet that the character of Rhodes will be hardly any different from the character that Rhames played in the Dawn remake? i bet Rhodes will actually be a nice guy in this one...if they make him into a a@@$%^e ill be surprised
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"