DC gets an overhaul

I don't say it just to say it. They've had plenty of years to get organized and failed at every turn.

And yes this is copying Marvel because all they are doing is going off of the model Marvel has already set up.

And if the model works? Why not try and duplicate it? They needed some kind of organization and structure. This move puts them in a position to compete with Marvel and that isn't something to frown on.
 
Either way, corporate restructuring isn't typically something to get ******** about.
 
It will be interesting to know how many movies will be shot by the time Nolan starts working on the $200 million budget Batman 3. Will it be just Losers and Hex, or will there be more to go along with those two.

And will the WB supply Nolan with a lifetime supply of vests?

:hehe:
 
It will be interesting to know how many movies will be shot by the time Nolan starts working on the $200 million budget Batman 3. Will it be just Losers and Hex, or will there be more to go along with those two.
It looks like there'll be more. They're aiming to start production on Green Lantern and Lobo next year, and it looks like Deadman could move forward within the next year or so.
 
What are you basing this on?

The numerous strong female characters he has in his TV shows? I mean, when he was on the project he was certainly doing his homework with researching the WW mythos. It's just that the personnel (Silver, Novieck) at the time didn't give him the time of day or didn't care outright.

And Whedon can deliver a good, solid action movie within a budget. He managed to produce Serenity in L.A. with a local crew for around $40 million. That's almost as impressive as District 9's budget.
 
Levitz & Nelson on DC Entertainment

* by Jonah Weiland, Executive Producer

News broke Wednesday that Paul Levitz, the President and Publisher of DC Comics since 2002 and a chief architect of the publisher’s success in other roles since the 1970s, had resigned. Levitz saw DC through such publishing milestones as “Watchmen” and “The Dark Knight Returns,” the formation of its influential Vertigo imprint, and guided the publisher through the creation of the direct market. Once a hugely popular writer of such DC titles as “The Legion of Super-Heroes,” Levitz will return to writing comic books full time, beginning with next year’s “Adventure Comics” #7. Levitz will also serve as a multipurpose consultant as the company continues its restructuring, a process which includes hiring a new Publisher.

Concurrently, DC Comics parent company Warner Bros. Entertainment announced the formation of DC Entertainment, a new entity under which DC Comics will continue to operate. DC Entertainment’s stated mission is to strategically exploit the DC brand across all media, such as video games and feature film. DC Entertainment’s President is Diane Nelson, who most recently served as the President of Warner Premiere, WB’s direct-to-consumer brand responsible for the “Green Lantern: First Flight” and “Batman: Gotham Knight” DVD features, among other projects. Most auspiciously, Nelson has managed the Harry Potter franchise for Warner Bros. since 1999, turning JK Rowling’s best-selling novels into a multimedia empire.

To learn more about DC Entertainment’s plans for DC Comics and what role Levitz will play in the newly organized company, CBR News spoke with Levitz and Nelson about all the day’s big news.

CBR Staff Writer Andy Khouri contributed to this story.

Jonah Weiland: Paul, the news of your stepping down as President and Publisher of DC came largely out of the blue for the comics press and readership. When did you decide you needed a change?

Paul Levitz: The original plan was for me to get out of here before Jeanette [Khan, who stepped down as President & Editor-In-Chief of DC Comics in 2002]. Originally the plan was I was going to hire a replacement whom I would break in, and then that person would aspire to taking [Jeanette’s] job when she was ready to leave and I would go off and write and teach and do some of the things I wanted to do. That plan didn’t quite work out as originally intended, as you may have noticed, and I’ve been kind of wandering around ever since saying, “I want to get to the writing and teaching one of these days, guys! The hair’s gray now!”

Diane Nelson: I’m still not going to let him do it – it’s all been a façade of, “Sure, you can write!”

Jonah Weiland: Paul, as a consultant, how active a participant will you be day-to-day with DC Entertainment?

Levitz: I think time will tell how that all works. The goal Diane has espoused to me is really a multi-faceted one. One part of the role is to help her understand this business and get a team in place and a structure in place and watch the store until she has that team up and ready. That, obviously, will be a fairly active role.

The longer term thing is to be available as both a creative consultant and a consultant on those things in the business that have mattered most to me – how we treat the talent and what the relationships are like there. That, I think, will vary project to project. There are times where I’m sure I’ll be as welcome in the room as I have been with [“The Dark Knight” Director] Chris Nolan, who’s turned into a wonderful friend, Jonathan [Nolan, co-writer of “The Dark Knight”] and Emma Thomas [producer of “The Dark Knight”], the whole team there. There will be other cases where Diane will tell me, “This one’s under control, kid, we don’t need you. Come see the movie when it comes out.” That will be fine, too, and anything in between.

After 37 years, I love this company and I’m happy to help in any way they think I can be useful.

Jonah Weiland: Diane, you are the President of DC Entertainment, but Paul served DC Comics in a dual role as both President and Publisher. Will you be serving DC Comics in that same dual role or is a new Publisher going to be brought in?

Nelson: We will be looking, with Paul’s input, for a successor who will act as Publisher of DC Comics. I don’t presume to have that expertise and I will very much want to find someone to whom Paul can pass the mantle, as it were. My role is much more, as my background indicates, about how do we take DC and treat it carefully and productively across our company. That’s what I’m looking forward to doing. I have a whole lot of experts at DC Comics who will help me understand the creative and fan communities and so forth.

Jonah Weiland: It doesn’t sound like there will be any immediate changes editorially or across the various DC imprints like Vertigo or WildStorm?

Nelson: No, that’s not our intention. This announcement today is about the establishment of DC Entertainment and what we hope to do with our renewed focus and priority for the future. We’ll look carefully at the organization and how we’ll best integrate it into Warner Bros. and I suppose it’s possible there would be implications in that realm, but that’s not the intention going in. I don’t really see any reason for that to happen.

Jonah Weiland: Diane, what do you see as DC Comics’ greatest strengths and assets today?

Nelson: It’s a reflection, I believe, or at least it’s consistent with what Warner Bros. has cared about and stood for, that we are a talent-friendly company and are a place that values creators. I think the depth and breadth of the DC library and all of its imprints give us a real advantage over any competitor, however you define them. This isn’t just about the biggest or most well-known properties -- those will clearly be a part of our initiative -- but it can equally be about much lesser known properties that we incubate and build throughout the company, and it can be and should be about the acquisitions of new properties and characters. We are a content company and we’ll be even more focused on that in the future and that’s on a Warner Bros. and Time Warner level. I think recognizing the value of what our creators have created in this library and treating them carefully for the long term is the single greatest thing we have to work with here.

Jonah Weiland: Paul, what do you see as the greatest strengths of the DC brand as you transition out of your role and as Diane transitions into hers?

Levitz: I think the magic of DC is that we have a creative environment and a creative team that sees a kind of story that has moved to the heart of the culture that we’re in. We’re living in a generation where the literature of the fantastic and visual literature are both becoming more and more important to the culture. You can see it both in the success of our material, but also in the success of where the writer’s and artists from here have moved on to do other kinds of work in their lives. DC assistant editors have written for TV Shows like “Heroes” and “Sex & The City,” as well as dramas like “Law & Order.” That kind of cross-pollination happens because our style of magic is now at the center of the stage. I think the DC Entertainment move will, hopefully, only accelerate that process of connecting our guys to those opportunities – the characters, the creative people, the magic that is this place.

Jonah Weiland: Diane, what will your focus be over the next six months?

Nelson: Initially, over the first six months, it’s going to be about learning and listening and looking carefully at the DC Comics organization, which, again, remains a foundation of what DC Entertainment will be. So, DC Comics as a publishing company will remain intact. DC Entertainment, as a new company within which DC Comics sits, is a place I need to think through and I need to do that with the benefit of input from everyone who works at DC Comics. I see it being a time of listening, learning and finding that balance between what core fans want and what’s potentially available and of interest on a broader audience level, and then finding the process by which we can most effectively integrate DC and its characters and stories into the Warner Bros. machine.

I feel compelled to clarify that does not mean deconstructing DC. What I mean by that is how do we create a system and a way of working together where the experts within each of our Warner Bros. businesses – feature film, television, digital, video games, merchandise – all have the ability to do what they do best in connection with DC Comics and vice versa.

So, with DC Entertainment, we’ll want to look at what is the portfolio of properties in what we’ll call Phase 1 – I’m making that up right now – but if we plan to announce some meat on the bone in January/February in terms of a theatrical slate, television initiatives and video game slate -- and that’s our goal, to give you more detail on what those initial priorities will be -- that will be a piece of it. But equally it will be about looking at the library and identifying priorities that may be smaller -- again, in the vein of incubation, where we move them within the company, perhaps on a smaller, more careful level. It’s going to be two-fold: the business and the process of how to set this up to be most effective for the future, and then it’s going to be looking at the library and picking priorities and initiatives to focus on. It’s sort of that simple.

Jonah Weiland: Diane, because this was an initiative you oversaw at Warner Premiere, will the DC motion comics library be expanded? Along those lines, are there any plans to make the DC Comics publishing library available for download?

Nelson: I’d like to start to answer the question and let Paul complete it, but having the benefit of having had responsibility and will continue to have supervisorial responsibility for Warner Premier, which as you know is our direct-to-consumer production arm, so Motion Comics as a category is something that Warner Premier, along with DC Comics and Warner Digital Distribution, really created. We branded it and started with “Watchmen” and other great motion comics properties and we believe that is something we can not only continue but expand upon.

The question of motion comics versus other digital initiatives, whether it’s what I would refer to as “digital publishing” -- and what I mean by that is the digital distribution of existing comics as they are designed for the physical format -- that’s a more complicated issue and one I think we need to look at together internally and make sure that if we think there’s a business opportunity for that, that it doesn’t compromise the integrity of how the comics were originally designed and intended to be experienced. It is a balance here. There is clearly a need to look at what the future of our business is going to look like and where fans are consuming content and how we are adjusting that without moving away from or in any way cannibalizing the core publishing business. Paul will be guiding me on that and I will be looking to others to evaluate so we can make careful decisions.

The short answer is yes and yes – digital is a huge part of where comic stories will live in the future and we need to be really very focused about looking at it.

Levitz: What I would add to that is we’ve been looking at the whole issue of how you offer comics through methods like downloads continuously since that began to evolve. Any way that people want to get our material, ultimately they will be able to get it, that’s the nature of a consumer society. In order to do that well there are creative challenges, as Diane said, in terms of how you present the material. There are business challenges in terms of how you treat the freelancers who created the material, which is always something that’s been important not only to me but to the overall company, Warner Bros., and how to deal properly with the talent. The good news is we now get some additional and fresh minds looking at that.

One of the downsides to being in a job as long as I have been – I ran across a quote in “The Coldest Winter” [a history of the Korean War by author David Halberstam] a few months back where one of the generals was being asked how in the world could MacArthur, the youngest General ever in the history of the U.S. and the youngest medal winner, considered one of the most brilliant Generals of his time, how did he blow spotting the Korean War coming? The General’s answer was, “He wore his stars too long.”

When I read that it had a certain resonance and I don’t want to be in that situation of wearing mine too long. It will be great to have some fresh eyes looking at some of these problems, while hopefully listening to the old eyes as well when they say, “That cliff over there? It’s not going to feel good if you jump off.” It becomes a healthier balance and I look forward to some of that dialogue going on and hopefully some of the brilliant solutions to come out of it.

Jonah Weiland: Diane, many of the biggest DC icons such as Superman, Wonder Woman, the Justice League and others aren’t in production as films, at least as far as the public knows. Will the formation of DC Entertainment take back control of these icons for film and television, and will production be accelerated?

Nelson: It’s a good question. I think the answer is this: Accelerated? Yes. Take control of? No. The culture of Warner Bros. and DC Entertainment is about cooperation, integration and focus. I think via focus you will see it’s not acceleration, but again a prioritization and a real focus on the properties you just named and a whole lot of others. We are also, though, a company that is about quality, so there will not be a rushing of our product for product’s sake. That’s not what Warner Bros. does. But I do think what you will see by virtue of all of this is a renewed prioritization and a real passion amongst all our businesses to bring more and more of these properties – both the big ones you mentioned and a whole bunch of others – to fans.

Jonah Weiland: Paul, what is your proudest achievement as an executive at DC Comics?

Levitz: When I look back on it, there’s so much in all the years I could mention, but of things I am particularly proud of is having been one of the people who both wrote the first broad contract for talent as a written contract, bringing us out of the old back-of-the check era [whereby cashing your check was tantamount to signing a contract], and having played a major role in the first royalty plans to apply to all the talent in the field. I think those were pivotal steps in opening the opportunity to creativity. When you look at how the dominoes fell, our decision to treat talent better in the late ‘70s and early ‘80s leads directly, I believe, to the creative flourish in the field in the mid-’80s. And the generation of people that brought in were the generation of people, much like yourself, who have grown up to be our advocates across the media, making the field more respectable and raising the expectations of what is possible in comics today.

So, the role I’ve had to play in all of that, whether it be the original deals or the distribution structure that I helped build in the process, all were steps, from an executive standpoint, that I can look back on proudly.

As I said, though, in my note on the blog, I learned long ago that the stuff that lasts isn’t the executive work, but the creative work.
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=22881
 
DC Entertainment's Diane Nelson: Grilled

"I’m the first to admit, I’m not by my nature a comic fan. What I bring to the party is a skill at moving properties and brands."

By Sharon Waxman
Published: September 09, 2009

Warner Brothers announced on Wednesday that Diane Nelson would head a new division at the studio, DC Entertainment. Coming on the heels of Disney’s acquisition of Marvel, the move puts a whole new emphasis on comic book-oriented entertainment. Nelson got grilled by TheWrap’s Sharon Waxman.

Was this announcement planned for today?
It’s something we’ve been discussing and planning for nearly a year. We wanted it before Labor Day – but then Marvel and Disney announced and we thought –

What did you think of that?
It is good. One, my hat is off to them. Bob Iger is great. I have nothing but respect for them. I’m glad we were thinking along the same lines without having to pay $4 billion. I think it’s good for the whole industry.

Because it validates your own thinking?
The notion of being able to take a library like DC’s -- a deep and broad one -- and have many characters that go far beyond the superheroes we know. The most prominent ones are the tip of the iceberg. This is about content driving an entertainment company.

How many characters does DC have?
When we saw Marvel deal I posed the question. We’re not sure how they got to that number (5,000). The answer was -- if you factor in the alternate universes, there are an infinite number of characters.

You don’t want to be quoted saying there are an infinite number of characters, do you?
We have reason to believe it’s even bigger than Marvel.

So: a girl running a comic book operation? Isn’t this a young, male-centric market?
I prefer to be known as an executive rather than a girl. It’s not gone without comment in the blogosphere. But I have to tell you, I’ve been really encouraged by the commentary in comic book world.

But I’m the first one to admit, I’m not by my nature a comic fan. It’s not what I’m bringing to the party. We have so many experts who will remain the cornerstone of DC Entertainment. What I bring to the party is a skill at moving properties and brands through Time Warner as a company.

What do you seek to accomplsih? How will you gauge success?
I will be measured on the p&l. We will be watching and tracking this business very specifically, and I will be focused on incremental value to the company from this new organization.

But additionally it will be about how invested our content distribution is in the DC library. If our businesses feel that they have greater access and enthusiasm for new characters to incubate.

Will Superman and Batman come under DC Entertainment?
Unlike Marvel, we are not setting up redundant organizations for expertise that exists. We will track all DC properties to measure financial success.

What does that mean?
In first quarter 2010 we will talk more specifically about organization and business plan, and our content slate -- including a theatrical slate and content for television and other places.

The important thing is, we are not creating a stand-alone production group that is developing movies.

Do you anticipate more comic book movies emerging from this move?
I imagine -- more content activity behind the DC properties -- including movies.

But you don’t know which ones yet?
We’re not prepared to talk about that.

This does help define Warner Brothers’ priorities – the end of of Warner Independent, the rise of DC Entertainment?
It’s been very encouraging to watch the company’s focus and prioritization change. It’s quite a big deal for the future of our company. It will be such an engine for all our content.
http://www.thewrap.com/article/warner-bros-diane-nelson-grilled_6786
 
Last edited:
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ct-warner10-2009sep10,0,1779787.story

Warner shakes up DC Comics to compete with Marvel

Facing even stronger competition with a Disney takeover of Marvel, the studio unveils a plan for tighter control of the superhero unit and names 'Harry Potter' brand manager Diane Nelson to run it.


Warner Bros. hopes to cure a case of superhero envy.

After years of lagging rival Marvel Entertainment in adapting comic-book properties for the big screen and other media, the Burbank studio unveiled a major restructuring of its DC Comics unit Wednesday that will bring its operations under tighter control.

The move is an effort by Warner Bros. and corporate parent Time Warner Inc. to implement a new strategy for DC Comics, which will face stiffer competition from a steroid-charged Marvel as a result of Walt Disney Co.'s deal last week to acquire it for $4 billion.

Diane Nelson, a top brand manager who has overseen Warner's lucrative "Harry Potter" franchise since 1999, has been put in charge of the newly named DC Entertainment with a mandate to better exploit its properties across the studio's movie, television, interactive, digital and consumer products businesses.

"This is the structural iteration of what we have been trying to accomplish for a long time," said Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer. "We think it is important for Warner Bros. to exercise appropriate control over these properties, because they are highly valued assets of our company."

For the four decades that Warner has owned DC, the publisher of such classic comics as "Superman," "Batman" and "Wonder Woman," the New York publisher has operated largely independently of the studio.

As superhero movies have become one of the most profitable genres in Hollywood, tensions between DC and Warner have contributed to the studio's inability to match the success of Marvel, which has scored on the big screen with such A-list characters as Spider-Man and lesser-known ones such as Iron Man and X-Men.

"It almost appears as if Warner Bros. were just buying DC now and deciding what to do with it," said Gareb Shamus, chief executive of Wizard Entertainment, which publishes a magazine following the comic-book industry. "This move is going to be great for Warner because it firmly puts the characters in control of the people who make movies and television."

Numerous DC properties, including "Wonder Woman," "Justice League" and "The Flash," have languished in development at Warner Bros. for years, with little coordination among the studio's producers and executives and the comic-book publisher. The unit's top development executive had reported directly to DC Publisher Paul Levitz rather than to anyone at Warner.

In one notable example, the CW Network, which Warner Bros. co-owns, last year announced plans to produce a show based on Batman's sidekick, Robin. Several months later it was killed after Motion Picture Group President Jeff Robinov and "Dark Knight" director Christopher Nolan, who hadn't been consulted, expressed their disapproval, according to people familiar with the situation.

Under the new structure, Nelson will report to Robinov. Levitz is moving to a consulting role.

"DC has been a publishing company, but I think it has the potential to do more," Nelson said. "I come into this not as a comic-book fan per se but someone who knows Warner Bros. and how to bring value to the DC properties."

The new DC chief has been Warner's point person for everything "Harry Potter" over the last 10 years. The franchise, adapted from the books by J.K. Rowling, has been the most successful in the studio's history, generating more than $5.4 billion in worldwide box office and billions more from DVDs, video games and other media.

But the move is not without risk. Comic-book fans are sure to be wary of a corporate executive taking control of their beloved characters and will be watching closely to see whom Nelson selects to replace Levitz and run DC's publishing arm.

Warner has had a mixed history with the DC properties it has adapted for other media.

Its biggest success, 2008's "The Dark Knight," generated more than $1 billion in worldwide ticket sales and was a top DVD seller. The CW Network's "Smallville," based on the early life of Superman, is entering its ninth season. "Batman: Arkham Asylum," a recent video game co-published by Warner Bros. Interactive, has sold nearly 2 million units in less than a month, a major hit.

However, the studio's "Watchmen" movie released in March was a box-office disappointment, 2006's costly "Superman Returns" wasn't successful enough to merit another sequel, and 2004's "Catwoman" film was a major flop.

The next movie up is "Jonah Hex," a supernatural western that has just completed production. Currently filming is the military-commando tale "The Losers." Warner's next major superhero movie will be "The Green Lantern," starring Ryan Reynolds, which begins shooting March 15 for release in the spring of 2011. A third Nolan-directed Batman movie is in development.

A large part of Nelson's strategy will be not only to exploit the highest-profile characters but also to identify lesser-known ones with potential to be used in movies, TV, games and other media, as Marvel has successfully done with second-tier properties like "Iron Man."

"Before, DC as a publishing entity in New York was a repository of assets accessed by the motion picture group, TV, games and consumer products," said Warner President Alan Horn. With the reorganization, he said, "there will be much more cross-pollination."
 
Will Superman and Batman come under DC Entertainment?
Unlike Marvel, we are not setting up redundant organizations for expertise that exists. We will track all DC properties to measure financial success.

Umm, ex-squeeze-me, what the hell does this mean? I already do not like this woman.
 
^You seemed to like it when RDJ talked smack about DC Comics. Are your feelings hurt that something like this was said about Marvel? I remember you quite distinctly liking the fighting words between Marvel and DC. But now that the shoe is on other foot...
 
Sounds like the same old crappy treatment DC typically receives in movies..with a shiny new wrapper.
 
^You seemed to like it when RDJ talked smack about DC Comics. Are your feelings hurt that something like this was said about Marvel? I remember you quite distinctly liking the fighting words between Marvel and DC. But now that the shoe is on other foot...

Then explain what she is talking about? What she said about Marvel makes no sense. The interviewer even asked her what that means and she didn't even explain it.

Robert Downey Jr. > Diane Nelson. Downey Jr. at least knows how to talk trash. This woman does not.
 
Robert Downey Jr. > Diane Nelson. Downey Jr. at least knows how to talk trash. This woman does not.
She's in PR, she CAN'T talk trash, duh. :whatever: This is what ALL people in PR and marketing do - talk in circles. That's why an interview with them is never helpful. You have to look at their WORK, and from her experience as a go-between for Harry Potter, I think she's well-qualified. She isn't going to be writing the movies or casting them or anything.
 
Calm down, Vile, you're misreading the exchange between Diane Nelson and the interviewer. She's not trash-talking Marvel. She's saying that, unlike Marvel, they're not setting up an independent film producing unit since it would be redundant as that expertise already exists within Warner Bros.

The interviewer's question of "what does that mean?" comes after Nelson spoke about tracking all DC properties to measure their financial success, which Nelson does answer by saying that more information about their business plan will be forthcoming early next year.
 
Calm down, Vile, you're misreading the exchange between Diane Nelson and the interviewer. She's not trash-talking Marvel. She's saying that, unlike Marvel, they're not setting up an independent film producing unit since it would be redundant as that expertise already exists within Warner Bros.

By that statement she's implying that Marvel has set up a redundant unit.

The interviewer's question of "what does that mean?" comes after Nelson spoke about tracking all DC properties to measure their financial success, which Nelson does answer by saying that more information about their business plan will be forthcoming early next year.

Not surprising. We've heard things like this before.
 
She's in PR, she CAN'T talk trash, duh. :whatever: This is what ALL people in PR and marketing do - talk in circles. That's why an interview with them is never helpful. You have to look at their WORK, and from her experience as a go-between for Harry Potter, I think she's well-qualified. She isn't going to be writing the movies or casting them or anything.
Why does Harry Potter make her truly qualified? And I'm not impressed by her talking in circles. I see no reason to believe or buy into any of her spin.
 
Ugh. Corporate interviews bore me. Someone summarize that for me in two sentences.

Warners knows that Nolan The Batman Films have made over a billion dollars worldwide, so they'll give Nolan $200 million for Batman 3. They will not give anyone else that luxury.

As someone pointed out, $150-200 is the going rate for an effects-heavy tentpole film.

I would imagine GREEN LANTERN would have a budget near that. Easily.

THE FLASH probably wouldn't need $200 million, but a budget of 160-180 wouldn't surprise me.

A new Superman movie will likely approach $200 million. It will almost have to in order to have enough scale and action to compete with other big-action superhero films.

Any JLA movie would have to be over $200 million.

The movies will all likely be in the $200 million ballpark. Give or take $10-15 million here and there, which, by the time you're approaching $200, isn't that big a difference in budget and capability.

The numerous strong female characters he has in his TV shows? I mean, when he was on the project he was certainly doing his homework with researching the WW mythos. It's just that the personnel (Silver, Novieck) at the time didn't give him the time of day or didn't care outright.

And Whedon can deliver a good, solid action movie within a budget. He managed to produce Serenity in L.A. with a local crew for around $40 million. That's almost as impressive as District 9's budget.

I have always smiled when people tell me that Whedon has strong female characters in his shows. Always.

"Strong female character" takes on a new meaning with Joss Whedon.

That doesn't tell me anything about Whedon's take on the character or mythology. So he researched it a bit...so did the guys who sold that WW spec script, which btw, was pretty subpar.

So what specifically are you basing the idea that Whedon gets WW on?
 
Last edited:
nice article finds, hopefully things all work out and change for the better with dce getting characters to films or to the tv screens.
 
I heard a rumor that Wheldon tried to change everything about Wonder Woman.
 
Why does Harry Potter make her truly qualified? And I'm not impressed by her talking in circles. I see no reason to believe or buy into any of her spin.
Because she's taken an ongoing book series and helped make them one of the most consistent movie franchises ever? No matter what you think, it's NOT a small feat.

None of the Harry Potter movies are OMG masterpieces but also, none of them are B&R bad. All of them are pretty watchable, and they've already released 6 of them in a fairly short amount of time. Not even the Batman series has that kind of consistency, and for a franchise that produces movies every 2 years, it's damn impressive.

But not like I'm going to change your mind or anything. :oldrazz:
 
I really don't think she deserves the lion's share of the credit for something like the HARRY POTTER franchise. She said it herself: She deals with brands. With marketing. Her job is to oversee that aspect of production, she's not going to have that much creative input, or even creative control, in some senses. It's her job to make sure brands are marketed and succeed, period. Deciding to make movies out of the best selling book series in recent years...that's good business, but it's not exactly brilliant, you know? That wasn't exactly an impossible franchise to get off the ground, though it's admittedly been pretty well handled thus far.

And yes, she talked in circles to a point, but she also basically told us not to expect a slew of DC superhero movies coming out soon, and not to expect WB to take huge financial gambles a la Marvel Studios.

"The important thing is, we are not creating a stand-alone production group that is developing movies."

It's going to be a few years before we see any major impact from this. I suspect we'll see some fairly consistent news about projects that have already been in the pipeline, though.
 
Last edited:
By that statement she's implying that Marvel has set up a redundant unit.
Reading the totality of her answers, I don't think she meant it that way. When someone gives a bunch of phone interviews where they're speaking off the cuff you're going to get a sentence here or there where the syntax doesn't match intent. Obviously Marvel didn't have their own fully-fledged producing capability before setting up Marvel Studios, so setting up that unit wasn't redundant for them. But Warner Bros does have that capability already, so it would be a redundant move for DC Entertainment. It's just a spoken sentence that in print can be misread. Nothing to get your panties in a bunch about.
 
Because she's taken an ongoing book series and helped make them one of the most consistent movie franchises ever? No matter what you think, it's NOT a small feat.

Show me where she is credited on any of the Harry Potter movies. Please. She's not a director. She didn't produce them. Her name isn't Radcliff, Columbus, Heyman, Newell, Cuaron, or Kloves.

None of the Harry Potter movies are OMG masterpieces but also, none of them are B&R bad. All of them are pretty watchable, and they've already released 6 of them in a fairly short amount of time. Not even the Batman series has that kind of consistency, and for a franchise that produces movies every 2 years, it's damn impressive.

She's not a filmmaker. She didn't create Harry Potter or the Harry Potter movies.
 
She's not involved in producing the Potter films. She coordinates the Potter brand across Time-Warner's corporate divisions and she acts as liaison to JK Rowling.
 
Reading the totality of her answers, I don't think she meant it that way. When someone gives a bunch of phone interviews where they're speaking off the cuff you're going to get a sentence here or there where the syntax doesn't match intent. Obviously Marvel didn't have their own fully-fledged producing capability before setting up Marvel Studios, so setting up that unit wasn't redundant for them. But Warner Bros does have that capability already, so it would be a redundant move for DC Entertainment. It's just a spoken sentence that in print can be misread. Nothing to get your panties in a bunch about.
Honestly, I don't think it would be redundant at all to have a wing or subsidiary to focus solely on producing DC media projects.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"