BT18
Superhero
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2004
- Messages
- 5,850
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Kingfish said:There are far more Statham fans than Dane Cook fans. I've never even heard of Dane Cook. Besides, Deadpool is not going to draw the kind of audience you are talking about unless they cast a mega-star like Pitt or Cruise.
But, c'mon, to say that Dane Cook is more popular than Jason Statham is just ridiculous.
As if a measure of a person's popularity should be measured by or extrapolated from who Kingfish has heard of. How egomaniacal do you get?
Dane is quite simply THE hottest comic in the country and has been so for atleast a couple of years. With maybe the hardest core of all fanbases among standups at this moment. Does Jason Statham have an online community devoted to him with 8357 registered users ? Among the 18 - 35 year old demographic, the most important demo in the country according to any consumer analyst, Dane Cook is extremely well known and Jason Statham is a no-name.
And the fact that Deadpool is a 2nd or 3rd tier character is EXACTLY the reason you need star power or some interesting star hook in the cast to get people aware. That's how it pretty much works. Superman allows an unknown. And sometimes they're necessary for a role that requires specific and rare physical or other non easily adaptable traits.
The filmmakers aren't dumb enough to cast someone who is BOTH relatively unknown and not having a loyal fanbase and not particularly naturally suited for the role by having the number one requirement (being very funny) to make up for it. Deadpool needs someone who can actually do all the stunts less than any other martial artist/acrobatic/stunt heavy comic book character because he's deformed and in a mask.
Switchin gears, did anyone see Dane on last night's Jimmy Kimmel? God damn he never stops being hilarious.
It was only released in 2,610 theaters anyway). I think Deadpool could make as much money as Daredevil did or at least Hellboy. I don't think it requires too much special FX either.