- Joined
- Jul 23, 2004
- Messages
- 70,181
- Reaction score
- 215
- Points
- 73
I don't think they did it with the intent to fix it. I think the studio made the first film (which I thought was mediocre but fun) as a very safe play. They didn't want to go out there with a "take over the world villain" in a castle from the start. That origin would just not fit in with the movie world as it does in comics. It'd be stupid. The characters are better tied together now. I liked Doom's origin in the film. I think it was done fine and I like how the film ended. What I didn't like was how corny his lines were in the end and how little of Doom we saw. The less the better because it leaves room for changes and improvements, etc...
*I guess we'll just have to disagree in this area....
*I didn't see an origin really.....I did think that even if they didn't go directly with the origin of the comics they could have pulled a cool villain from it.....don't think that happened....
*I would have liked the improvements to have been "improvement on a really good movie..." ala Spiderman to Spiderman 2 IMO....but that can't happen......What I'm hoping for is a very medicore movie to a FANTASTIC movie......I have a sinking feeling (because of my trust in Fox) that we will get a mediocre movie to a slightly better movie.....
*Could I be wrong......YES.......and you know I will be the first to admit it......
