
t:
I am curious about something though Horatio, Julian's and Tim's statements on Doom seem very different from what your friend posted in the stutue's forum.
to be honest I've lost faith in that guy. he refuses to give me anymore details or info on what he saw but his excuses make no sense. I'm sure there is plenty he could tell me which would not jeapordize his friend yet confirm that he indeed saw it, but he won't. The main reason I believed him was that I saw no reason for him to lie. I guess we'll have to see
On the changes in FF, the FF is a property that is over several volumes and years. The funny thing about the complaining about the source material is that the Thing in the first movie is the original Jack Kirby Thing.
this is a mistake that is frequently made by people.
first off, we can all agree that there must be 2 changes made in superhero movies.
1-they must be contemporized
2-they cannot put 40 years into 2 hrs.
they wouldn't have to though. All any superhero movie has to do is choose 1 major story from the comics and tell that story. They may draw certain other things from the 40 year history or omit some things, but no one expects them to tell 10 or more years in 2 hrs.
Spider-man did it, and did it just right.
So when we talk about the source material there is a lot of complexity. So in essence we really are talking about the definitive Thing.
So now we have a problem. The definitive Thing is different, but then you also have the new Ultimate Universe. And the question in the minds of the movie studios is this do you pay any attention to those fans.
The 616 fans would say no, but those books are very popular.
So it comes down to who do you please and the truth is you will never be able to please all the people, fans all of the time.
you're right it is complex and we are dealing with the definitive Thing rather than the "original" thing. as far as the ultimate, the best way to look at this is to ask one self WHICH version is responsible for the demand for films to be made after so many decades? The key is to look for the magic, the thing that worked and captured people's imagination. That could happen in 2 years or in 50 years. I think if you look at it that way the answer is clearly the definitive (not original) 616 Fantastic Four universe. The ultimates may be "hot" be they have not proven themselves to be what the FF are. many "hot" things come and go, and right now 616 books are once again starting to overtake UA books. so we don't know yet.
The reality is that FF is much more difficult to do. The special effects were harder to do. I wanted the 616 definitive FF too, but I can see where changes were made due to the uncertainty. The studio, Fox has not had the success with these movies that Sony has had and it suggests that they are more cash strapped or less of a risktaker.
actually I disagree with that. What makes the FF anymore difficult than any other sci fi or superhero movie? In fact the FF movie didn't have a "special effects" problem. It had an execution problem. Real Doom is no more difficult to make that the "doom" they came up with. I've seen a TON of asian flicks which acheived much cooler FX than most hollywood flicks for 1/4 the budget. and you can tell a very quiet even low budget FF story that is powerfull and effective.
However as Advanced Dark said you can see how much effort has been put into FF2, they know now they can make the money. And it is being reflected in the production values, many of us see that.
I do see some improvements but as I said I also see more of the same.
However AD, purple eater Galactus would work, believe it. However to be safe I say use the UA version, it is already out there and it has already gotten huge approval.
oh no, you just lost me there. NO Ultimate Galactus, PLEASE. that would be as bad as the gas thing,