StorminNorman
Avenger
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2005
- Messages
- 30,513
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 33
Hey, it's tough being a teacher. They get tenure, so the are protected against being fired and getting the joy of finding another job.
Look at the service employee comparison you forgot to look at.
Then when you throw in benefits, where public sector clearly are leaps and bounds ahead and at the cost of the tax payer, you have a very large discrepancy between wages. Who pays more into their retirement? Public or private? Who pays more into their health insurance? Public or private? So who do you think has more take home? I guess factcheck.org doesn't fact check common sense.
Why shouldn't private sector employees be getting the exact same benefits and insurance as public sector workers? We are after all paying for it anyways. Public sector employees are no better than private sector employees so yes, I do think they shouldn't be able to negotiate such ridiculous pensions and healthcare plans at the cost of the tax payer. But here's the kicker: the union uses dues to pay for that politician's re-election campaign that got them those sweetheart deals like 0.2% pension contributions. That should be illegal and all that amounts to is organized crime. Once again, unions are nothing more than legal mobs.
What did happen to the free market? It is so free, I can't pay 0.2% into my retirement like those lovely Wisonsin teachers and have the tax payer pick up the rest. What did happen to that free market?
This is all about unions. They have bankrupted the state. When the economy goes into the toilet and everyone has to cut back, who are the only people protesting that they don't want to cut back? UNIONS.
So you are trying to say that public sector employees shouldn't negotiate a health plan for themselves and be like those private sector employees who are under insured and go bankrupt because they can't afford to pay their medical bills? What ever happened to the free market where the employee is free to associate and be represented by whomever he pleases and try to get the best deal that he can? Once again this is not a issue about unions. For most of these state that are in financial trouble, it is about revenue as a result of higher unemployment. If that rate were lower we wouldn't be having this discussion at all. In the case of Wisconsin, they actually had a surplus until a month ago. In fact the unions could have negotiated their contract last year, but Scott Walker told the legislature not to negotiate right after he got elected in November.
You miss the subtly of tongue-in-cheek.
Marx didn't.
Hey, it's tough being a teacher. They get tenure, so the are protected against being fired and getting the joy of finding another job.
Government =/= free market.
In a free market, if a businesses costs rise too much, buyers won't purchase the product.
In government, if costs rise too much, you just raise taxes or borrow money against your childrens' futures. Either way, the taxpayer has no choice but to pay (and pay more) . . . unless (s)he moves away. And, we're seeing that happen in high tax areas.
This is on the greedy unions who make the exact same salary on average as the private sector worker but have exorbitant benefits that go far and beyond what any private sector worker can ever dream of. Get real, it's time for everyone to cut back and that means poor ole unions.
Please do not make general statements about teachers as if all are of the ilk of those in Wisconsin. We aren't... I pay a good portion into my TRS, and I pay a good portion of my health care...I get paid far less than the work I put in, if we put it to hourly, it would be pretty sad looking....
I have about 2 solid weeks off in the summer, far from the 2.5 months that Hannity stated was a benefit of being a teacher. I work through most holidays, and most evenings. I'm a damn good teacher and proud of it, I do not do it for pay. I can assure you there are MANY MORE OF ME OUT THERE....and we find it extremely ignorant, disrespectful and simply rude when people make general statements about who they THINK teachers are and what they do.
As far as tenure, in most states that simply means that the administration must have 2 years of documentation in order to fire a teacher.
I was personally called out by Marx. And he had reason to, and with the way I talk it would be very easy to criticize me if I couldn't back it up. But I can. Not only can I defend myself rhetorically and philosophically but my personal success serves to give further credibility to my political swagger. If I constantly brought up my success in every conversation, that would be a sign of weakness. But I hadn't mentioned it to Marx or to the board in general before today.And, after reading some of your posts today......your arrogance is far outweighing your intelligence...
A great man does not need to speak of his accomplishments.