Discussion: Evolution

[ShadowBoxing]

Yeah VenomFang, just an FYI...that picture is fake.

 

[Joker]

I have some awesome pictures of the chupacabra I could post...all just about as real as that giant demon man

 

[Addendum]

VenomFang owned himself

 

[Joker]

so...Satan hosted an online photoshop contest in a ruse to get people to post real pictures of giant demon men there? They have the internet in hell? I bet it's only 28k, cause you know, that would just be evil...although, how would they get the hardline to reach???

 

[Addendum]

It's time like this I'd rather have StarWarsAgent.

At least his posts were funny, and not spam

 

[mightiest_mortal]

Im started to wonder if Venomfang is actually a real poster, and not just some automated Spam Bot for some nutjob website.

 

[jaguarr]

Photoshop is the work of the DEVIL!!!! OMG!!!!!



jag

 

[Addendum]

Im started to wonder if Venomfang is actually a real poster, and not just some automated Spam Bot for some nutjob website.

I guess so. Pretty much all of VenomFang's 448 posts have been nothing but spam

 

[Joker]

Anton Szandor Lavey says- Photoshop rocks!

 

[Addendum]

Disabling rating on youtube is a sign of a coward

 

[VenomFang]

I didn't want peoples opinions getting in the way of the truth

 

[Joker]

I didn't want peoples opinions getting in the way of the truth

read as- "I didnt want sane people to tell me my video was all photoshopped crap so as to maybe brainwash a few other sheep"

 

[Addendum]

I didn't want peoples opinions getting in the way of the truth

Meaning you lack the ability to handle criticism and think differing opinions are of the devil.

Guess what. So did he.

 

[Joker]

ha ha! b4nz0r3d!

 

[Morg]

I didn't want peoples opinions getting in the way of the truth

*waves bye* you don't know what is truth

 

[Super Kal]

and neither do the evolutionists...

 

[Joker]

and neither do the evolutionists...

we have at least as much of an idea of what the truth is as you creationists do, and at least ours is founded on fact...nothing wrong with believing in things, but once something has been pretty much proven, ala evolution, it's time to rethink and adapt (evolve if you will) your beliefe system to survive in the real world, or you're gonna end up like VenomFang

 

[Addendum]

and neither do the evolutionists...

But you see, the thing is, scientists don't claim to know everything. When new evidence from research comes in, they consider that as well. If it invalidates a theory, then they admit it. If it backs it up, then that theory gets strength.

 

[Carcharodon]

An every day theory and a scientific theory are two different things.

That's what I've been saying all along...people just tend not to listen.

 

[Super Kal]

we have at least as much of an idea of what the truth is as you creationists do, and at least ours is founded on fact...nothing wrong with believing in things, but once something has been pretty much proven, ala evolution, it's time to rethink and adapt (evolve if you will) your beliefe system to survive in the real world, or you're gonna end up like VenomFang

I'm a devout Christian, so I don't need to rethink anything, because I'm happy where I am, and there's nothing wrong with that.

 

[Carcharodon]

I just have to laugh at that.

I guess religions should include some fine print at the end of their "holy books" that reads "Of course, when we say 'available to everyone' that doesn't include cynics, skeptics, people who don't subscribe to blind faith, and people who don't trust easily"

Dude, I don't know what world you're living in...but that's how it really is.

 

[Addendum]

Dude, I don't know what world you're living in...but that's how it really is.

But if it's for everyone, then wouldn't it make sense for the message to somehow get past the cynicism, skepticism, and distrust?

Or should I leave common sense in the corner when discussing religious beliefs?

 

[ShadowBoxing]

and neither do the evolutionists...

Truth in what sense. The "Truth" with a capital "T", the reason for being, or the essence of life, or the meaning of life. No. But then science doesn't claim to know that. However science does claim to "know" (lower case) a method by which to examine the world based on facts and make claims about the physical realm from those facts. Evolution, for example, is heavily grounded in fact yet it does, and only claims to, explain mechanics of things. Even if science explains everything science is capable of explaining there is still mystery to the world, just no physical mystery.

The other thing is science doesn't deal in absolutes "rights" and "wrongs", if it did it would be religion. It will adapt it's thinking to new evidence even if it invalidates all that came before it, however unlikely that is.

 

[Carcharodon]

But if it's for everyone, then wouldn't it make sense for the message to somehow get past the cynicism, skepticism, and distrust?

Or should I leave common sense in the corner when discussing religious beliefs?

Read carefully: It's not for everyone. Game over.

Thank you for your time.

 

[Eros]

But if it's for everyone, then wouldn't it make sense for the message to somehow get past the cynicism, skepticism, and distrust?

Or should I leave common sense in the corner when discussing religious beliefs?

nice one.