Evolution is a lie

Status
Not open for further replies.

VenomFang

Civilian
Joined
Jan 14, 2001
Messages
438
Reaction score
0
Points
11
http://www.blueletterbible.org/audio_video/hovind_kent/creation/creation_template.html

If evolution is a frequent occurance in nature, then why has nothing evolved in recorded human history? Surely a single animal would evolve a single trait within the last couple of thousand years?

If evolutionists claim that it takes millions of years, then they have an even worse problem. If evolution is a freak occurance that only happens every few million years, how did the first human find a mate if the next one wouldn't be around for a few million years?

Infact, how did any creature find a suitable mate, if the chances of finding an evolved species is both rare in time, and proximity?

All factual evidence proves beyond any doubt that evolution is a bankrupt theory, lacking in both intellectual reasoning and proof.

Scientists tried to prove evolution by taking the fastest spawning creature on earth (the common house fly) and multiplying them unto the millionth or so generation. The experiment goes on today, and the house flies are still having house flies. Surely if evolution was true, one of them at some point would develop some kind of new trait? Or perhaps God's word is correct, and that animals can only reproduce their own kind. Cat's can only have cat's. Dog's can only have dog's. Human's can only have human's. This certainly makes sense, and it is what we observe. Not a single variation has ever occured in recorded history, and it never will.

There is 0 evidence for evolution.

If I take a spoon, a spork, and a fork, and line them up in sequence, I can claim that the spoon evolved into a fork over billions of years, and the spork is the missing link.

That's what evolutionists have done. They have taken fossils, put a fictional date on them, then claimed that one turned into the other. Ridiculous.

It's funny, evolutionists refuse to believe in God because they can't see Him. So likewise, I refuse to believe in evolution because it's never been seen. If you have trouble with that, you may have other troubles, too.
 
Close this thread before it turns into a big thing
 
VenomFang said:
If I take a spoon, a spork, and a fork, and line them up in sequence, I can claim that the spoon evolved into a fork over billions of years, and the spork is the missing link.

I am going to live by this quote.
 
I think a thread of value is just what this place needs
 
VenomFang said:
http://www.blueletterbible.org/audio_video/hovind_kent/creation/creation_template.html

If evolution is a frequent occurance in nature, then why has nothing evolved in recorded human history? Surely a single animal would evolve a single trait within the last couple of thousand years?

If evolutionists claim that it takes millions of years, then they have an even worse problem. If evolution is a freak occurance that only happens every few million years, how did the first human find a mate if the next one wouldn't be around for a few million years?

Infact, how did any creature find a suitable mate, if the chances of finding an evolved species is both rare in time, and proximity?

All factual evidence proves beyond any doubt that evolution is a bankrupt theory, lacking in both intellectual reasoning and proof.

Scientists tried to prove evolution by taking the fastest spawning creature on earth (the common house fly) and multiplying them unto the millionth or so generation. The experiment goes on today, and the house flies are still having house flies. Surely if evolution was true, one of them at some point would develop some kind of new trait? Or perhaps God's word is correct, and that animals can only reproduce their own kind. Cat's can only have cat's. Dog's can only have dog's. Human's can only have human's. This certainly makes sense, and it is what we observe. Not a single variation has ever occured in recorded history, and it never will.

It's funny, evolutionists refuse to believe in God because they can't see Him. So likewise, I refuse to believe in evolution because it's never been seen. If you have trouble with that, you may have other troubles, too.

There is 0 evidence for evolution.

If I take a spoon, a spork, and a fork, and line them up in sequence, I can claim that the spoon evolved into a fork over billions of years, and the spork is the missing link.

That's what evolutionists have done. They have taken fossils, put a fictional date on them, then claimed that one turned into the other. Ridiculous.


Let's do the old fashioned chicken and egg question. We all know that a chicken only comes from an egg. And we all know that chicken eggs come from chickens. There's no room for evolution here. The chicken must have been first, meaning the chicken had to be created by God, just as God said in His word. God made all the creatures, and the creatures reproduce after their own kind. A chicken can only have a chicken.
5266.jpg
 
creatures are mutating all the time.:huh:
 
You know what would be great. If I had the abilibty to engineer a deadly virus that only infected people of low intelligence.
 
Abaddon said:
creatures are mutating all the time.:huh:

Natural Selection allows a salt water alligator to become a fresh water alligator if the water environment requires it. And vice versa; it can be done within a few generations. This is not a mutation, but merely the genetic abilities of the species for adaptation. Note however, it is still an alligator. The alligator will never become a dog, or a banana.
 
VenomFang said:
Natural Selection allows a salt water alligator to become a fresh water alligator if the water environment requires it.

What does natural selection have to do with that?:huh:
 
You DO realize that new traits don't just magically appear in a baby, right?

An example of evolution is how the average height of human beings has increased since the Middle Ages.
 
VenomFang said:
Natural Selection allows a salt water alligator to become a fresh water alligator if the water environment requires it. And vice versa; it can be done within a few generations. This is not a mutation, but merely the genetic abilities of the species for adaptation. Note however, it is still an alligator. The alligator will never become a dog, or a banana.

This proves, right here, that you have no idea how evolution works.
 
Halcohol said:
You DO realize that new traits don't just magically appear in a baby, right?

An example of evolution is how the average height of human beings has increased since the Middle Ages.

Actually, we are discovering 12-foot man skeletons, indicating that mankind used to be a lot taller than we are today, just like The Holy Bible says.

You see the Earth was once like a hyper-baric oxygen chamber with double the air pressure and oxygen. This allowed the dinosaurs to grow enourmous, and all other creatures, humans too.

Did you ever wonder why dinosaurs aren't around anymore? It's because since the flood 4400 years ago, the 7th layer of the atmosphere made of water, described in detail in The Holy Bible, fell to the Earth during the great flood. The oxygen levels and pressure became what we know today, and such large creatures could no longer survive.
 
"The alligator will never become a dog, or a banana."

This is the most brilliant sentence ever written, in any language, in the world.
 
Tyrinus said:
This proves, right here, that you have no idea how evolution works.

Actually, since evolution is a lie, it is you who doesn't understand how it works, because it doesn't work at all.

Evolution claims that all life forms on Earth came from the first single-celled organism. Meaning you and a banana have the same common ancestor according to evolution. This is a lie.
 
A chicken doesn't have another chicken absolutely identical to itself. The new chicken is slightly different in chemical make-up. These changes, when combined over several generations, result in a creature significantly different from its ancestors.

I guarantee you are healthier than your ancestors from 100 years ago and that you definitely have a higher life expectancy. Meanwhile, animals have developed immunity to or defects from chemicals unnatural in their environment and have by now perhaps evolved new enzymes or antibodies to fight off those chemicals.
 
VenomFang said:
Actually, we are discovering 12-foot man skeletons, indicating that mankind used to be a lot taller than we are today, just like The Holy Bible says.

You see the Earth was once like a hyper-baric oxygen chamber with double the air pressure and oxygen. This allowed the dinosaurs to grow enourmous, and all other creatures, humans too.

Did you ever wonder why dinosaurs aren't around anymore? It's because since the flood 4400 years ago, the 7th layer of the atmosphere made of water, described in detail in The Holy Bible, fell to the Earth during the great flood. The oxygen levels and pressure became what we know today, and such large creatures could no longer survive.
bible_warning.jpg
 
VenomFang said:
Actually, since evolution is a lie, it is you who doesn't understand how it works, because it doesn't work at all.

Evolution claims that all life forms on Earth came from the first single-celled organism. Meaning you and a banana have the same common ancestor according to evolution. This is a lie.
that is merely one of many theories of evolution.

pick up a book sometime. not THAT book. :up:
 
Didn't you used to be a hardcore atheist back in the Spidey Hype days?:huh:
 
'Evolution' requires that the Earth be older than a few million years old. If one could prove the Earth is roughly 6 thousand years old, then the idea of evolution must be thrown out.

When USA landed on the moon for the first time, they assumed there would be ‘billions’ of years worth of dust collected on the surface. They imagined that their space-shuttle would sink through the dust layers and be swallowed by the dust. When they landed, it turned out there was only an inch or so of dust on the moon. They then imagined perhaps the moon wasn’t collecting dust at the rate they imagined. So they attempted to measure the rate in which the moon was collecting dust, and to their surprise it was actually collecting dust, still. They did this by putting a plate down, and allowing it to collect dust. Then they measured the dust collection rate. When they applied that to the amount of dust on the moon, it couldn’t have possibly been collecting dust for more than 6 thousnd yrs.

More interesting still, the moon is actually moving away from the Earth. Some people argue that the Earth just acquired the moon as it passed by in space, and the Earth’s gravity caught it 6 thousand years ago. If this was true however, the moon would be moving towards the earth, to our doom. This is not the case, it is proven that the moon is moving away from the earth. More interesting still, space is a frictionless void so an object in motion, regardless of its size, will remain at the same speed it is going until it encounters resistance. So, if the moon has been moving away from the earth for ‘billions’ of years at its current rate, it would be so far away from the earth we wouldn’t even be able to see it. This proves the moon has only been moving away from the earth for a short time.

Comets are made of rock and ice, and as they travel through space, they lose their mass. When you see a comet, you see a tail behind them, that is the ice and rock flying off the body of the comet. Even the largest comets only have a life span of the a few thousand years. If the universe was billions of years old, there would be no comets.

The sun loses 1 200 000 tons of mass every second. If the sun is billions of years old, and you applied that rate of consumption for a lifespan of billions of years, the sun would have been large enough to swallow the earth, clearly not possible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"