Discussion: The REPUBLICAN Party - - Part 17

Status
Not open for further replies.
Because all Republicans care about is staying in power. Democrats do too but at least they still try to govern.

Look at Chaffetz. He's bragging that he has at least 2 years worth of material to hold hearings on to try to get Clinton. Way to use taxpayer money.
 
It's a damn shame John McCain has thrown in his lot with the extreme right, rather than the moderate Republican he used to be.
 
Fearmongering is the GOP's bread and butter.
 
GOP Senators No Longer Want The People To Decide On Supreme Court Justices

Sen. Richard Burr said he wanted to let voters decide the next Supreme Court nominee. Now he’s saying he’d oppose any nomination from a President Hillary Clinton.

Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) made a noteworthy declaration about his post-election political intents on Monday, though it was lost amid his joke, for which he has since apologized, about shooting Hillary Clinton.

Should he head back to the Senate, Burr pledged, he would try to block any Supreme Court nomination from a President Clinton.

“If Hillary Clinton becomes president, I am going to do everything I can do to make sure four years from now, we still got an opening on the Supreme Court,” he said.

This is how constitutional crises are made. And it’s also why Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Clinton’s running mate, told The Huffington Post that Senate Democrats would try to nuke the filibuster option on Supreme Court nominees should they regain power in that chamber.

Beyond that, though, Burr’s words Monday are directly at odds with the preferred Republican talking point about the Supreme Court that arose when President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland in March to take the seat of the deceased Antonin Scalia ― a talking point that Burr adopted.

Back then, the North Carolina Republican didn’t wait long to explain that he wouldn’t be considering Garland’s nomination because it was coming too close to a presidential election.

“The American people deserve a voice in the nomination of the next Supreme Court Justice,” Burr explained. “This appointment could easily tip the balance of the court in a direction not supported by the American people as evidenced by 2014’s election results giving Republicans both the Senate and House.”

Note the specific wording of the statement, which is still on Burr’s website. He wasn’t arguing that voters deserved “a voice” in choosing the next president, who would nominate a Supreme Court justice, and the next Senate, which would advise and consent on that nominee. He spoke strictly about allowing voter input in the nomination. More than seven months later, Burr is now throwing that argument out the window, pledging to block a nomination if the “American people” choose a president he opposes.

Burr isn’t the only senator who has abandoned the March dictum of letting the voters decide. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) also recently pledged to block any Supreme Court nominee proposed by Clinton. And his press release from when Garland was nominated was even more explicit in saying that the next president, specifically, should get a say.

“This issue is not about any single nominee ― it’s about the integrity of the Court. With less than a year left in a lame-duck presidency and the long-term ideological balance of the Supreme Court at stake, I believe the American people must have a voice in the direction of the Supreme Court by electing a new president.” (Emphasis is ours.)

There is also Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who is now making the case that there is ample precedent for the Supreme Court to operate with only eight members. When the Garland nomination was announced, he too said the Senate should sit on its hands and let the election happen first.

“I proudly stand with my Republican colleagues in our shared belief ― our advice and consent ― that we should not vote on any nominee until the next president is sworn into office,” the Cruz statement read. “The People will decide. I commend Mitch McConnell and Chuck Grassley for holding the line and ensuring that We the People get to exercise our authority to decide the direction of the Supreme Court and the Bill of Rights.”

Cruz’s statement from March allows more wiggle room for him to now argue that he was talking about waiting for both the composition of a new Congress as well as the next president before considering a Supreme Court nominee. McCain’s and Burr’s weren’t nearly as broadly worded.

And for Burr in particular, advocating for an open seat on the court is a patently obvious flip in position. Back in 2005, he specifically argued that an eight-person Supreme Court would render the institution toothless.

“If we are not able to produce a Justice out of this fine Hall, then they will meet with eight Justices. I have to believe there is an odd number of Justices for a very logical reason. It was so there would not be a tie. On a 4-to-4 tie, what happens? Seldom have we asked the question,” he said in a speech arguing for the appointment of a circuit court justice. “On a 4-to-4 tie in the Supreme Court, the lower court’s decision stands. That means all of a sudden the Supreme Court, our highest court, the Court we look to to be the best and brightest to interpret law and the Constitution, is insignificant in the process.”

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5818db21e4b0390e69d2d9b7

I hate these ****ers.
 
Four years of vacancy on a Supreme Court seat just because Hillary is President?

That is abject dereliction of duty.
 
GOP Senators No Longer Want The People To Decide On Supreme Court Justices



I hate these ****ers.

So, instead of spending four years blocking a nominee, put forth a Constitutional Ammendment. At least that's doing something!
 
Four years of vacancy on a Supreme Court seat just because Hillary is President?

That is abject dereliction of duty.

Yeah there really needs to be a way to deal with this sort of behavior. The people's supposed ability to vote them out every so often clearly isnt enough incentive to keep them doing their job. There needs to be a way of firing them or fining them a percentage of their total income or forbidding them from running for office for a set amount of time. If they dont want to do their duty they have no business being in office.

And congress should only have a certain amount of days to fill a SCOTUS vacancy. 90 days for example. If they dont fill it within those days the president should be able to fill the vacancy with or without congressional approval.
 
The GOP is just a f***ing disease at this point.
 
Wait a second....the people have picked the SCOTUS?????? why am I just now hearing of this?????WTF?
 
Burr ranks behind McCrory as the most despicable politician in North Carolina. Nothing would please me more than to wake up and see Deborah Ross win the Senate election.
 
How House Republicans Derailed A Scientist Whose Research Could Save Lives

Dr. Eugene Gu, a 30-year-old surgical resident at Vanderbilt University, is on the verge of his second major scientific breakthrough.

While doing side research as a surgical intern in 2014, Gu became the first person to successfully implant the heart and kidney of a human fetus into a rat. The organs actually grew inside the rat and sustained its life ― a result that could have enormous implications for the treatment of life-threatening birth defects.

“This is the 21st century! Instead of studying cells in a dish, like Louis Pasteur used, why don’t we have a whole human heart?” Gu said in a phone interview, his voice crackling with excitement. “Having a whole organ working for you ― beating, surviving, growing ― that’s really powerful in science. It has a potential to cure a lot of diseases.”

Gu, who was awarded a prestigious Howard Hughes Medical Research Fellowship when he was only 25, says his ultimate goal is to transplant healthy fetal organs in utero to babies with fatal congenital diseases, so they can survive to adulthood with fully functioning hearts and kidneys. He also hopes to grow human organs in animals that biomedical researchers could then use to develop cures for heart disease, the leading cause of death in the world, and end-stage renal failure, the No. 1 reason patients are on transplant waiting lists.

“I want to someday end the organ donor shortage,” he said.

But Gu’s research hit a snag in April of this year when two armed United States marshals banged on the door of his studio apartment. It was 10 a.m, and Gu had been sleeping off an all-night trauma surgery shift at Vanderbilt hospital. He had no idea why the police would be at his house and he was afraid to let the marshals in.

“I know my rights,” Gu told the marshals. “I’m not going to open the door unless you have a warrant.”

“We don’t need a warrant,” one of the men replied. “This is a congressional subpoena.”

The subpoena had come from the House of Representatives’ Select Investigative Panel On Infants’ Lives, led by Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.). Gu’s start-up research company, Ganogen, is one of more than 30 organizations being investigated by House Republicans over the use of fetal tissue from abortion clinics.

Gu obtains the organs he uses in his research from StemExpress, a company that accepts fetal tissue donations from abortion providers and supplies it to biomedical researchers. Republicans in Congress have been on a mission to outlaw the practice, which they describe as “selling baby body parts,” since an anti-abortion activist produced a series of heavily edited “sting videos” on Planned Parenthood working with StemExpress in 2015. Planned Parenthood says it sometimes donates, but does not sell, fetal tissue for medical research after an abortion at the request of the mother. The family planning provider is then reimbursed for the costs of transporting and preserving the tissue, which is explicitly allowed by federal law.

Still, Gu’s association with StemExpress put him in the cross hairs of anti-abortion politicians, who demanded to see his emails, records of every financial transaction Ganogen made, names of all of his employees, and any equipment or material he purchased with regard to fetal tissue research.

A spokesman for the House panel said the goal of the investigation is to “protect the integrity of research, scientific advancements, and voluntary organ donation in America.”

“As you know, at the core of our investigation is a federal statute that prohibits the sale of fetal tissue for a profit,” he said. “Evidence uncovered by our Panel reveals that the unethical and potentially unlawful practices of some bad actors, like StemExpress, may be putting important scientific research at risk. Since Ganogen was listed on documents produced to our Panel as a customer who purchased fetal tissue from StemExpress, we subpoenaed the company for information that is pertinent to our effort to get all the facts.”

But Gu said the negative attention from Congress has created a “harrowing” ordeal for him. Fellow surgical residents at Vanderbilt became suspicious of him. He said one colleague compared him to Martin Skrelli, the deeply hated pharmaceutical executive who had to testify before Congress after he acquired the manufacturing license for a life-saving anti-parasitic drug and raised its price by 5,556 percent. Gu’s academic evaluations turned negative, after years of near-perfect grades, and he says the doctors he was observing in surgery became more demanding and critical of him.

Outside of school, anti-abortion activists began to harass him on social media and send him angry notes.

“How’s your beating baby heart business going @Ganogen_Inc @eugenegu?” tweeted David Daleiden, the activist behind the Planned Parenthood videos.

“I felt under siege,” Gu said. “I’m just trying to save people’s lives, and now I’m being thrown into this abortion fight as a proxy. I have nothing to do with abortion, I don’t encourage abortion ― I just use tissue that would otherwise be discarded. And now I’m painted as this ‘baby killer’ just for doing research as a medical student.”

What’s worse, he said, is that the “Panel on Infants’ Lives” is actually undermining what he believes could be a groundbreaking medical breakthrough.

“All this controversy and opposition from the Republicans is stymying my research in a pretty significant way,” he said, “which is kind of weird because the scientific community is supposed to be immune to political shenanigans and oppression.”


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/eugene-gu-research-congress_us_581a3d79e4b01a82df6460de
 
Last edited:
That happens every where, by both parties, they were stupid enough to put it in an email, and the people are lucky enough to have caught them.... :)
 
Eh... I think the public record shows that more often than not the last decade at least, much more action has been taken by the GOP to use state and local laws they have been able to enact to suppress voter turnout and registration than in comparison to anything on the Democratic side.
 
When has the Democrat Party suppressed voting?
 
So Paul Ryan is saying they have a mandate? How? Trump barely won, looks like Clinton won the popular vote, and the country is still divided.

Go ahead and drive the car into the ditch but don't act more than half of the country asked you to.
 
Congrats GOP, this is the bed you've made and now you have to lie in it. You have the Presidency, the Senate, and Congress. Let's see you bring about this "Great America" you want. If you f*** this up you won't be able to lay any of the blame on the Dems (although I'm sure you'll try).
 
To all Republicans. If you voted for Trump, you know where I stand. To everyone else, I apologize about the slack that a lot of this will be placed on you. Members of the Republican party did not vote for Trump and have been against Trump from the start. I personally full acknowledge that. Just wanted to apologize for the years ahead and wish you the best of luck in aiming to maintain a sane public image so that Trump doesn't tarnish it. I know not every Republican was for Trump even in the slightest.
 
Congrats GOP, this is the bed you've made and now you have to lie in it. You have the Presidency, the Senate, and Congress. Let's see you bring about this "Great America" you want. If you f*** this up you won't be able to lay any of the blame on the Dems (although I'm sure you'll try).

This. I'll let the GOP drive the car for awhile. Show us what this country should be and when it all goes to **** you won't have a single scapegoat to blame.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,304
Messages
22,082,628
Members
45,882
Latest member
Charles Xavier
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"