I just heard that Assange has landed a million dollar book deal...
Web attack takes Anonymous activists offline
The notorious message board 4Chan has been taken offline by an overwhelming web attack. The attack might be retaliation for similar attacks that some 4Chan members, as part of the Anonymous group, mounted in support of Wikileaks.
Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12090245
Julian Assange is my hero.
**** Obama and Hillary on the war in Afghanistan. I'm with Obama on a lot of domestic issues but he is a typical war mongering American President.
He's such a 'typical warmonger' that he has taken troop levels down in Iraq and refocused the war in Afghanistan? President Obama did not ask for either of these wars and he is doing what he can to end them as soon as possible. That is hardly a 'warmonger'.
I believe he's allowing American troops to continue dying in Afghanistan in an unnecessary war. All because he doesn't have the political backbone to stand up to the military on this. He's a Democrat, and *gasp* a Liberal so he has to prove he can be a a war monger too so no one thinks he's a wussy. It sounds juvenile and stupid because it is juvenile and stupid. It's nothing but crass political motivation(and miscalculated IMO, at that).
Less than 100 Al Queda in Afghanistan. There's a lot more of them in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia than Afghanistan.
He is also keeping up extraordinary rendition of prisoners to countries that torture and he continues to order the assassinations of U.S. citizens abroad without any form of due process. He also refuses to close Guantanamo Bay. So far he is really no better than Bush was on foreign policy, IMO except for perhaps one area. He seems to be a LITTLE more fair an arbiter in the Israel/Palestine conflict. But hell so was George H.W. Bush and he invaded Panama and his State Department helped provoke Iraq into invading Kuwait. Sure, you can go on in, the U.S. will consider it a regional matter.... HOW DARE YOU INVADE KUWAIT!! WE ARE SHOCKED THAT ANY INVADING IS GOING ON HERE AT THIS ESTABLISHMENT!
![]()
I believe he's allowing American troops to continue dying in Afghanistan in an unnecessary war. All because he doesn't have the political backbone to stand up to the military on this. He's a Democrat, and *gasp* a Liberal so he has to prove he can be a a war monger too so no one thinks he's a wussy. It sounds juvenile and stupid because it is juvenile and stupid. It's nothing but crass political motivation(and miscalculated IMO, at that).
Less than 100 Al Queda in Afghanistan. There's a lot more of them in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia than Afghanistan.
He is also keeping up extraordinary rendition of prisoners to countries that torture and he continues to order the assassinations of U.S. citizens abroad without any form of due process. He also refuses to close Guantanamo Bay. So far he is really no better than Bush was on foreign policy, IMO except for perhaps one area. He seems to be a LITTLE more fair an arbiter in the Israel/Palestine conflict. But hell so was George H.W. Bush and he invaded Panama and his State Department helped provoke Iraq into invading Kuwait. Sure, you can go on in, the U.S. will consider it a regional matter.... HOW DARE YOU INVADE KUWAIT!! WE ARE SHOCKED THAT ANY INVADING IS GOING ON HERE AT THIS ESTABLISHMENT!
![]()
The Afghan War was entirely justified. Progress is being made there, albeit much slower than anyone would like. This war is also winding down. It's just a matter of time.
Does this mean that you are railing against warmongers but advocating opening up wars in three more countries?
Where is your proof of rendition?
You do realize that he signed an executive order to close Gitmo, right? The problem is what to do with the people that are there. It has absolutely nothing to do with him 'refusing to close it'.
He's no better on foreign policy than George W. Bush? I really think you need to look back at the Bush years. President W Bush's foreign policy was 'BOMB and ask questions later'.
Everyone around here knows that I am against both wars, have been from the start....I have always believed that the outcome we wanted could have been done without sending troops.....BUT.....we are there now, and as much as I would love for us to just "up and leave" Iraq and Afghanistan....that just isn't in the cards as of yet.
As far as Gitmo? I think he had the right idea going in, but once he got there he saw the REALITY OF THE SITUATION AS IT IS....and as many have stated....where do you send them, their own countries don't want them, and the recidivism rate of these guys going back into the field of war is huge....so something else has to happen.
What Obama found once he was in office is what ALL PRESIDENTS find....the promises they made campaigning are not necessarily the reality they have to live with once they are in office. I call it their "WTF moment"...
As far as Gitmo? I think he had the right idea going in, but once he got there he saw the REALITY OF THE SITUATION AS IT IS....and as many have stated....where do you send them, their own countries don't want them, and the recidivism rate of these guys going back into the field of war is huge....so something else has to happen.
What Obama found once he was in office is what ALL PRESIDENTS find....the promises they made campaigning are not necessarily the reality they have to live with once they are in office. I call it their "WTF moment"...