sithgoblin
King of the Castle
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2000
- Messages
- 11,236
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
In this day and age of mass visual media, do you think a non-astheatically pleaseing person could be elected President of the United States?
Barack Obama, George Bush, Bill Clinton - they are all good looking men. There have been some exceptions in the 20th Century, like Nixon and Bush Sr, who I don't think looked that appealing when in office... but that was then.
Look at someone like Abraham Lincoln. He is a strange looking man. Look at people like Bill Richardson - a capable man who never had a chance because he is not handsome. During the same election, there was running criticism that Hillary would not age well if elected and "we'd have to look at her wrinkles and sags for the next four years".
What do you think? Could someone who looks like the Toxic Avenger win popularity with today's society? Do we value superficiality over ability?
Barack Obama, George Bush, Bill Clinton - they are all good looking men. There have been some exceptions in the 20th Century, like Nixon and Bush Sr, who I don't think looked that appealing when in office... but that was then.
Look at someone like Abraham Lincoln. He is a strange looking man. Look at people like Bill Richardson - a capable man who never had a chance because he is not handsome. During the same election, there was running criticism that Hillary would not age well if elected and "we'd have to look at her wrinkles and sags for the next four years".
What do you think? Could someone who looks like the Toxic Avenger win popularity with today's society? Do we value superficiality over ability?
Last edited: