Do you want a Hulk remake?

[Golgo-13]

come on dude, i hope your kidding with all this crap

Ah, just a little light humor.

 

[DTX]

Well, I'm GLAD, then! -_0

 

[AVEITWITHJAMON]

Well Hulk IMO is Marvels best origin movie

 

[bamm86]

NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!

I AM HOPING SO HARD THAT THEY DO NOT MAKE SUCH A STUPID MISTAKE AS THAT.

I thought those kind of movie mistakes ended with th 90's. Different actors playing main characters (3 Ninjas, Batman movies, etc.) Didn't work for them and ain't gonna work here.

You say "well, it happens in the comics" and I say, "well, this isn't flippin' comics." We wanna see a comic book character and his story put on the big screen in a realistic adaptation.... GOD I can't even focus!! BRENDAN FRASER????? WHAT IS THE WORLD COMING TOO?? Even IF he isn't going to end up in their remake, the fact that he is even a possibility is frightening. Just an omen. A big FAT omen. Stick to the 2003 HULK PLEEEEASE!!

 

[DTX]

Well Hulk IMO is Marvels best origin movie

.............M'eh.........................

 

[Spade]

The complaints I noticed of the first was:

1) No gamma bomb

2) Too much character development

3) Didn't live up to canon facts

The response to 1: gamma bombs are a silly thing to try and show. It would involve making the viewer believe that the Nevada test site I live by still randomly drops bombs. Anyways, I somehow believe an ICBM trumps a gamma bomb in this day and age.

The response to 2: I'm sorry to burst the common naysayer's bubble but Bruce's mother didn't give birth to the Hulk already 7 feet tall, looking like the jolly green giant and screaming "HULK SMASH!" He was Bruce Banner first. When you make the second self usurp the true character you get the negative reaction Superman Returns is coming under lately.

The response to 3: canon facts in Marvel are not assiduous. Most Hulk fans remember his hundred and fifty billion ton feat during the Secret Wars, and his almost instantaneous regeneration of skin and sinew as the Professor Hulk. If you want a complete capturing of the character from comic to movie you will always be sadly disappointed.

The first Hulk film was great. Why anyone would want to restart the series just because the director for the original project was Ang Lee is beyond me.

 

[AVEITWITHJAMON]

^ Its beyond many of us here, but the latest interviews released do point more towards a sequel so hopefully that is what we will get.

 

[Hiruu]

The complaints I noticed of the first was:

1) No gamma bomb

2) Too much character development

3) Didn't live up to canon facts

The response to 1: gamma bombs are a silly thing to try and show. It would involve making the viewer believe that the Nevada test site I live by still randomly drops bombs. Anyways, I somehow believe an ICBM trumps a gamma bomb in this day and age.

The response to 2: I'm sorry to burst the common naysayer's bubble but Bruce's mother didn't give birth to the Hulk already 7 feet tall, looking like the jolly green giant and screaming "HULK SMASH!" He was Bruce Banner first. When you make the second self usurp the true character you get the negative reaction Superman Returns is coming under lately.

The response to 3: canon facts in Marvel are not assiduous. Most Hulk fans remember his hundred and fifty billion ton feat during the Secret Wars, and his almost instantaneous regeneration of skin and sinew as the Professor Hulk. If you want a complete capturing of the character from comic to movie you will always be sadly disappointed.

The first Hulk film was great. Why anyone would want to restart the series just because the director for the original project was Ang Lee is beyond me.

A-MEN!

Hulk is one of the HARDEST characters to flesh out, since he's basically a creature born of pure rage. The origin story was always going to be a difficult one to get across, and they should have really consider a better closing act, over the father-absorbing man ending, but the character development was great. The groundwork has been laid, and it's really a golden opportunity to deliver a action packed popcorn movie. As to the movie's commercial success, it was dismal result on the B.O. front, as the movie failed to make breakeven, which is a key tenent imho, but it wasn't a commerical failure. I think they need to get Eric Bana back onboard, and start off RIGHT where they ended it. The Gov't is looking for the Hulk, and they are alway testing gamma radiation to replicate some of the effects...things go badly and they create the Leader and/or Abomination...the fun begins!

 

[DTX]

The complaints I noticed of the first was:

1) No gamma bomb

2) Too much character development

3) Didn't live up to canon facts

The response to 1: gamma bombs are a silly thing to try and show. It would involve making the viewer believe that the Nevada test site I live by still randomly drops bombs. Anyways, I somehow believe an ICBM trumps a gamma bomb in this day and age.

The response to 2: I'm sorry to burst the common naysayer's bubble but Bruce's mother didn't give birth to the Hulk already 7 feet tall, looking like the jolly green giant and screaming "HULK SMASH!" He was Bruce Banner first. When you make the second self usurp the true character you get the negative reaction Superman Returns is coming under lately.

The response to 3: canon facts in Marvel are not assiduous. Most Hulk fans remember his hundred and fifty billion ton feat during the Secret Wars, and his almost instantaneous regeneration of skin and sinew as the Professor Hulk. If you want a complete capturing of the character from comic to movie you will always be sadly disappointed.

The first Hulk film was great. Why anyone would want to restart the series just because the director for the original project was Ang Lee is beyond me.

Well, they DID show that green mushroom cloud, which IMPLYED an atomic explosion!

 

[comicgenius2111]

i don't think they should make a remake because that won't make any sense.

 

[DTX]

Yeah, people will be like, "what the hell kind of sequel is this?!".....of course, I'm referring to the slower...types of people...<_<...>_>.....

 

[GammaMike]

NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!

I AM HOPING SO HARD THAT THEY DO NOT MAKE SUCH A STUPID MISTAKE AS THAT.

I thought those kind of movie mistakes ended with th 90's. Different actors playing main characters (3 Ninjas, Batman movies, etc.) Didn't work for them and ain't gonna work here.

You say "well, it happens in the comics" and I say, "well, this isn't flippin' comics." We wanna see a comic book character and his story put on the big screen in a realistic adaptation.... GOD I can't even focus!! BRENDAN FRASER????? WHAT IS THE WORLD COMING TOO?? Even IF he isn't going to end up in their remake, the fact that he is even a possibility is frightening. Just an omen. A big FAT omen. Stick to the 2003 HULK PLEEEEASE!!

let me get this str8 changing actors was a mistake in 3 Ninjas II? I actually thought greenlighting that sequel was the mistake in itself.......

 

[Sava]

let me get this str8 changing actors was a mistake in 3 Ninjas II? I actually thought greenlighting that sequel was the mistake in itself.......

lol...

 

[Spade]

Well, they DID show that green mushroom cloud, which IMPLYED an atomic explosion!

He bats it to second and hits a foul...read the novelization; it clearly states that was meant to be the cyclotron exploding. Even if it was a gamma-irradiated explosion all it's meant to be is a memory. The Hulk was created through Bruce's repression of those memories and not the explosion itself.