Sequels Does Anyone Think..

[buggs0268]

Wouldn't 2010 mean more time for the effects? Just a thought. Still indifferent though unless it stuffs up the Superman sequel. I don't like that idea.

Angeloz

No studios are trying to make prep, and post for a film faster. They hire a few effects firms and they can get the film in by 2009. Totally doable.

 

[Angeloz]

I'm not talking about whether it's doable I mean it gives more time to get it right and polished. As I said just a thought. I still want a Superman sequel.

Angeloz

 

[buggs0268]

I'm not talking about whether it's doable I mean it gives more time to get it right and polished. As I said just a thought. I still want a Superman sequel.

Angeloz

A lot of classics where actually rushed films. A lot of stinkers had time to be polished into the stinkers they are. Jaws was a rush project. It had a similar situation where it had to start shooting due to the same contract negotiations that the studios are rushing now. Jaws started filming with only half a script. Every movie is re-written and worked over every day of filming. And Miller is a very competent director. Guys like him don't need to take time and rewrite after rewrite to polish a script. He can knock it out pretty quickly.

 

[Angeloz]

I meant the visual effects not the script. Although I can point out "X-Men 3" was rushed. I'll grant you the effects were good but not the story.

Angeloz

 

[Darth Nata]

As if a movie as big as Justice League or Man of Steel would be released over here in Australia a year after it was released in America. Whoever thinks that is even plausible is pretty stupid.

 

[Angeloz]

Well it could be a December/January thing. But we'd get it on Boxing Day (December 26) as is tradition here (Australia as we know).

Angeloz