Sci-Fi Dune

Is he saying that the son absolutely butchered the seventh novel, or did he just make an unfortunate attempt at saying posthumously?

Or rather he said posthumously, and the person who wrote and transcribed the article misinterpreted the word as "preposterously" which means something different.
 
Last edited:
I'm not a fan of getting even more subscription services, but HBO Max being released here gave me a pretty good excuse to rewatch this movie again. Still absolutely love it. Still found small things I hadn't noticed on previous viewings.
 
Oh good. Even more beautiful IMAX footage that he can crop to ****. I'll eagerly await never being able to see this footage in OAR.
:grmp:

 
I'd prefer the wider IMAX ratio though. The largest format of course makes for a special experience in a real IMAX theater but I don't think 1.43:1 is the nicest format when judged on it's own for composing a picture.
 
In terms of home viewing (on a 16X9 screen)…

With ZSJL, there were some complaints about the square (IMAX) format. I guess folks were miffed that the available real estate on either side of the image was being wasted. OTOH, you also lose real estate on top and bottom with many widescreen aspect ratios. And there seems to be less fuss about that. So what’s the actual math on these two formats? Does widescreen use significantly more of the 16X9 space?
 
Last edited:
In terms of home viewing (on a 16X9 screen)…

With ZSJL, there were some complaints about the square (IMAX) format. I guess folks were miffed that the available real estate on either side of the image was being wasted. OTOH, you also lose real estate on top and bottom with many widescreen aspect rations. And there seems to be less fuss about that. So what’s the actual math on these two formats? Does widescreen use significantly more of the 16X9 space?

No, you're not using less real estate with 1.44:1 than with 2.39:1 on a 16:9 TV but rather a bit more. Then there are less wide widescreen aspect ratios that instead use more but I don't think screen real estate is that much of a problem either way.

My only objection is the aesthetic of the more boxy format as I generally like wider (or longer, if it's a vertical painting) composition for art. Especially for epic scenery. To me it's a bit of a trade-off to get the biggest screens as IMAX chose that ratio.

The worst thing is of course when you don't get OAR on the home release since then you're stuck with a composition that's not what they originally made.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr.
I grew up during the widescreen vs pan and scan days. Seeing 2.35 films lose 40% of thei picture on home video, because home tvs were 4:3 and not the same as theaters.

Its just frustrating as hell to see directors and DOPs that also lived and worked through those days when their films were cropped to hell on home video do this **** again with IMAX. Sure there is more care taken in the cropping and the DOP and director are involved in the process now, but its the same end result. Instead of the OAR we get only part of the picture because our tvs aren't a certain native format.

And the IMAX situation is worse than the pan and scan days. In the pan and scan days every theater could play films in OAR. I only needed to drive 30 minutes or less to see any film in OAR. With IMAX the number of venues is much smaller. I have to drive 2 hours to see a film in LieMax. Its 5.5 hours to the nearest true IMAX. It wouldn't be so bad if IMAX would at least loosen up and let Dolby cinemas play IMAX films but they won't.

Just to be clear, I love IMAX. I want films shot for IMAX. I just would love to be able to actually watch IMAX films in OAR.
 
Last edited:
Well deserved except for Best Editing IMO. They cut a lot of good material out and the movie didn't even have a proper ending. Not to mention, they set up Paul getting his name, but they didn't even include that scene.
 
Well deserved except for Best Editing IMO. They cut a lot of good material out and the movie didn't even have a proper ending. Not to mention, they set up Paul getting his name, but they didn't even include that scene.
The fact that there was even more good material to work with doesn't have much to do with how good the editing of the final product was imo. Either way, really happy to see all the wins, though I think the way the Academy treated this movie and Denis is pretty weird. This does, however, cement Dune even more as a prestige franchise. Good news for everyone involved and also likely means that box office results for the sequel will be somewhat less relevant.
 
The fact that there was even more good material to work with doesn't have much to do with how good the editing of the final product was imo. Either way, really happy to see all the wins, though I think the way the Academy treated this movie and Denis is pretty weird. This does, however, cement Dune even more as a prestige franchise. Good news for everyone involved and also likely means that box office results for the sequel will be somewhat less relevant.

It definitely does. To me the ending of the movie is bad. It just ends abruptly. IMHO that's bad editing. Also, to not have Paul ever recite the Litany Against Fear, also bad editing.
 
It definitely does. To me the ending of the movie is bad. It just ends abruptly. IMHO that's bad editing. Also, to not have Paul ever recite the Litany Against Fear, also bad editing.

Yeah the abruptness killed the momentum for me. I can’t wait for Part 2 to come out and then view both parts as one whole movie.
 
Chalamet’s outfit last night was… a choice.

It was wonderful. I love that him, Pattinson, K-Stew, Zendaya, Harry Styles, and Zoe and all doing these classy gender-bending sexy ass looks.

It's honestly stunning how open these folks are with twisting fashion, but keeping it more in-line with traditional than "runway" if that makes sense.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,391
Messages
22,096,451
Members
45,893
Latest member
KCA Masterpiece
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"