Wolvieboy17
Anthropomorphic Clock
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2006
- Messages
- 12,061
- Reaction score
- 922
- Points
- 73
Here are the two factors that lead me to have a different opinion and strongly disagree with you.
One, I work in News and Current Affairs for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, which is Government funded and prides itself on being entirely impartial. It's not privately owned, especially by Murdoch, so it isn't influenced nor does it have an agenda other than simply reporting the news. My father has also been a journalist for 40 years and I've watched him, my whole life, completely disregard whatever his own beliefs were, in order to present a balanced and factual reportage of current events and politics.
The other factor is the difference in Media in the US. You guys simply have vastly less options or places to go for non biased news. In Aus it's quite simple because basically all the commercial news programs are recognised as being sensationalist, with the more trustworthy programs being the ABC or SBS (our World News and Foreign Affairs channel). In the US, you guys are bombarded with so many shouting voices, proclaiming to be news, but is in fact just editorial diatribe.
I agree with what you say though Pat, about the news we partake in being biased towards our own beliefs. The problem is that not enough people's beliefs seem to involve actually getting balanced, factual information. Without a desire for that, you are essentially willingly giving up your own critical and analytical thought in place of being told what to think by whatever news source you've chosen.
This has nothing to do with right wing vs left wing. Someone spouting BS statistics they heard on the O'Reilly Factor is just as misguided as someone letting all their opinions be coloured by Jon Stewart because he's 'funny'.
Alright, I'm done :P
One, I work in News and Current Affairs for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, which is Government funded and prides itself on being entirely impartial. It's not privately owned, especially by Murdoch, so it isn't influenced nor does it have an agenda other than simply reporting the news. My father has also been a journalist for 40 years and I've watched him, my whole life, completely disregard whatever his own beliefs were, in order to present a balanced and factual reportage of current events and politics.
The other factor is the difference in Media in the US. You guys simply have vastly less options or places to go for non biased news. In Aus it's quite simple because basically all the commercial news programs are recognised as being sensationalist, with the more trustworthy programs being the ABC or SBS (our World News and Foreign Affairs channel). In the US, you guys are bombarded with so many shouting voices, proclaiming to be news, but is in fact just editorial diatribe.
I agree with what you say though Pat, about the news we partake in being biased towards our own beliefs. The problem is that not enough people's beliefs seem to involve actually getting balanced, factual information. Without a desire for that, you are essentially willingly giving up your own critical and analytical thought in place of being told what to think by whatever news source you've chosen.
This has nothing to do with right wing vs left wing. Someone spouting BS statistics they heard on the O'Reilly Factor is just as misguided as someone letting all their opinions be coloured by Jon Stewart because he's 'funny'.
Alright, I'm done :P
