
Enough with the freaking helmets already. We will see them when/if we do.
I love you "thegameq"t:
my thoughts exactly
t:Uh, yeah, they are. That's kind of why I've been saying as much repeatedly for the past two days. The costumes look like a melding of various versions from the comics with an emphasis on the crazy, elaborate patterns in Kirby and Simonson's designs, especially. They're not what I initially expected after Branagh and others played up the fantasy/Shakespearean aspects of the character, but once I got over that initial change in expectations, I came to like them a lot.
And I'm not sure why I shouldn't believe that many people are disappointed because the Asgardians don't look like something out of The 13th Warrior. People have been leveling that exact complaint--using that exact movie as reference, no less--since we got the first concept art of Thor's full costume design about a month ago. People are still leveling that same criticism at the costumes now, as if a full month wasn't enough for them to get over it and deal with the fact that the designers simply chose not to go that route. It's the complaint I see most often, so it's the one I addressed.
Others claim the costumes look like cheap plastic, but I'm not sure how many more ways I can state that they don't to me. I don't even know how to address that complaint further because I simply don't think they look cheap when I look at them. They look as impressive as any professionally made movie costumes I've seen. Granted, I'm not exactly a full-time film critic or anything, so maybe my opinion isn't quite as well informed as others', but I know what I like and don't like when I see them and I find I like the look of these costumes quite a lot.
After all, the look of the characters doesn't necessarily determine the tone of the movie itself. The costumes are a little bit campy--as anything that tries to adapt so directly from the comics will wind up being--but given Branagh's reputation and the caliber of the actors involved, I have no doubt that the movie itself will be as epic as Thor deserves. At the end of the day, the costumes are just the window-dressing. While I do like them, I'm still far more interested in seeing some scenes from the film and learning what kind of tone the movie will have overall. I'm especially interested in seeing Hiddleston's portrayal of Loki.![]()
Well first of all they only released 3 PHOTOS from this movie and an Et clip. Its not like they released 10 or 15 pictures without the helmet. People to remember that this not a comic book where they wear the helmets 24/7 these are real actors wearing these costumes, I remember reading an interview where Chris said that the costume looks great but is really uncomfortable to wear. So would really want the actor to wear the helmet 24/7 on top of wearing a costume that uncomfortable no it would make sense to leave helmet off for scenes when there not doing not doing anything.there's a saying "If you're going to bother doing something, do it right"
that applies here, we're getting photo after photo of the characters minus the helmets (which are THE MOST ICONIC parts of the characters, without the helmets, they're just not them, the movie is a fail)
without the horns, does that actor honestly look like he's portraying Loki? HELL NO!!!!!!!!!!
it doesn't work
and the more photo's that are released without them, the more the fans have every single last right to worry
Well first of all they only released 3 PHOTOS from this movie and an Et clip. Its not like they released 10 or 15 pictures without the helmet. People to remember that this not a comic book where they wear the helmets 24/7 these are real actors wearing these costumes, I remember reading an interview where Chris said that the costume looks great but is really uncomfortable to wear. So would really want the actor to wear the helmet 24/7 on top of wearing a costume that uncomfortable no it would make sense to leave helmet off for scenes when there not doing not doing anything.
Also some of you need to stop saying that the costumes define the character cause that's not true. The costume is the second important thing to these characters, the first thing is there personalty and the expression on there faces. The costumes are just there for the character to look like a comic book character. Say what you want about their costumes but you can obviously tell by looking at Loki's face that he planing something sinister and that you cant really trust him. Is it true that people will recognize him more with helmet yes but to me he still looks like Loki and going to cause the some mischief. I cant wait for next Saturday when get more pictures and a trailer that's going to show that this movie is going to be awesome even though they might not show the helmet a lot in the movie.
there's a saying "If you're going to bother doing something, do it right"
that applies here, we're getting photo after photo of the characters minus the helmets (which are THE MOST ICONIC parts of the characters, without the helmets, they're just not them, the movie is a fail)
without the horns, does that actor honestly look like he's portraying Loki? HELL NO!!!!!!!!!!
it doesn't work
and the more photo's that are released without them, the more the fans have every single last right to worry
Listen to yourself!there's a saying "If you're going to bother doing something, do it right"
that applies here, we're getting photo after photo of the characters minus the helmets (which are THE MOST ICONIC parts of the characters, without the helmets, they're just not them, the movie is a fail)
without the horns, does that actor honestly look like he's portraying Loki? HELL NO!!!!!!!!!!
it doesn't work
and the more photo's that are released without them, the more the fans have every single last right to worry

Yea but unlike Iron Man's helmet Thor's helmet doesn't define who character is. If Iron Man took off his helmet he would be tony stark but if Thor took off his helmet he's still Thor the same thing for Loki and that's the point i was trying to make. So of couse going to show Iron Man's full suit and for the hulk its cgi so there going to show that. I agree with you that they are probably downplaying the helmet on purpose because they got it wrong but also the helmet might be in more important scenes if that's the case I rather wait to see it cause sometimes they show to much of important action pact scenes and once you see the movie almost half of the important stuff is already revealed. Also this movie is 10 months away so it make sense to show less important talking scenes rather then action scenes with the helmet.Yeah, I agree with MBD (except about the movie failing without the helmets though).
You know, considering how important the look of these characters are, Marvel really should have made an effort to get some promo shots of these characters in their Helmets. It really would have put alot of fans at ease. Granted, promo shots of the characters in their Helmets may be forthcoming at the Con, but Marvel really should know better by now.
Eliminate any fan paranoia immediately by releasing photos that set the fans at ease as they did with IM. I remember all the pessimism and paranoia on the IM boards (and rightfully so)--no one really believed they could pull off IM's armor, or that if they did, it would be watered down in some way or fashion. The fact that Stan Winston was in on the armors creation, there was a little glimmer of hope.
Then Marvel released the photos and the board was in shock and awe. Yeah there were the usual gripes here and there, but man it was such a relief to see the IM armor bought to life in all it's glory. You could feel the tide turn on the boards. There was a surge of confidence in the film. Then came the sneak peak at the trailer from the Con. The rest is history.
You could say the same thing with TIH. Skepticism and paranoia abound--include me in that group as I had no real faith in the film. All info that was released created more questions than answers. Then came the promo images and you could feel the board take a turn for the positive. It was the Hulk as most know him. It was awesome. Again, a certain confidence swept over the boards.
While it's probably obvious to most reasonable fans that they won't have the helmets on all the time, it really does play into the fans paranoia to not have seen any promo shots of the characters in all the regal splendor complete with helmets.
And while there's probably no true doubt that the helmets will be there, if you're a fan, in the back of your mind you have to be wondering what exactly do these helmets look like and if they're so great and "spot on" why haven't we seen them yet? We all know the rule about not covering up the actors face and all, but for the sake of promo shots and setting the fans at ease, show us the helmets.
Honestly, I don't see what the big deal is....do the helmets look dorky or something? Maybe as someone said earlier, the helmets may not look as good as Marvel hoped and they're being downplayed on purpose.
Never leave things to the imagination of us fanboys.![]()
Never leave things to the imagination of us fanboys.
Exactly. I completely agree with this statement....but if that was the case sites like this wouldnt do to well would they![]()

t:EDIT: On the Helmet issue I would have to also agree with the majority that the helmets will be seen in combat and outdoor situations. I highly doubt they would disregard such an aspect to Thor as his helmet, seems to me that it would be a suicide decision that they couldnt make.
haha very nice sir...very nice...
EDIT: http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/104047-new-photo-of-thor-and-odin
Tell me there that the armor looks bad.......IT LOOKS EPIC!