M
Maestro Limpio
Guest
Wow, I expected some solid reviews but I'm surprised at how positive these are...
OneKnight said:I think we have to ask ourselves one question:
Does WB want massive box office or critical praise? I ask that because I don't think they can get both.
My reasoning?
I think if critics like it a lot, and if older members here (late teens and up) do as well, then I think it loses the box office to a simpler popcorn flick like POTC2 whuch is bound to appeal more to younger teens and kids who nowadays seem to want action over story/substance.
OneKnight said:I think we have to ask ourselves one question:
Does WB want massive box office or critical praise? I ask that because I don't think they can get both.
My reasoning?
I think if critics like it a lot, and if older members here (late teens and up) do as well, then I think it loses the box office to a simpler popcorn flick like POTC2 whuch is bound to appeal more to younger teens and kids who nowadays seem to want action over story/substance.
charl_huntress said:Has AICN posted their review? I would think that they would have one up by now.
Also, when is the ban for the full review and spoilers lifted?
JamalYIgle said:Uhmmm. STM was both a massive hit and critcally praised. Alot of movies are critcally praised and massive hits. LOTR for example, the Indiana Jones movies, The star Wars trilogy.
While this is certainly positive...is this really the kind of posititve that a Superman movie OUGHT TO have? I mean, there are comparrisons to 9/11 for godsakes. It sounds like an art house flick, not a Superman movie.
No I understood your point. You think that a movie can't be both a commercial hit and a critical hit because if the critics like it it'll be too highbrow for teen and small children. My point is that it's been done before, and from all indicator returns will do it as well.OneKnight said:You completely missed the point, but that's okay.
Ita-KalEl said:Executive producer Chris Lee introduced the film, noting that it had just been put to bed and that some minor tweaks -- i.e. color corrections -- still might be made.
I agree with you. I remember when some critics were saying simular things about Hulk and nobody liked that movie. I hope it's just a stuck-up reviewer who's looking way too much into the movie.Matt said:While this is certainly positive...is this really the kind of posititve that a Superman movie OUGHT TO have? I mean, there are comparrisons to 9/11 for godsakes. It sounds like an art house flick, not a Superman movie.
Brandon Routh is Superman. Period. He seemed to embody the very fiber of Superman's being. He turned in a phenomenal performance and gave a fresh face to a well-known character.
Brandon Routh is my Superman. I really think he was fantastic in this film, and he was particularly strong in his Superman scenes with Kate Bosworth's Lois Lane. There's something very interesting going on in Brandon's performance. He's not simply cloning what Reeve gave us two decades ago, but he is exuding the same sort of aura that Reeve did back then. The best way that I can describe it is to say that these two are cut from the same cloth.
Brandon Routh turns in a performance that at many times plays as an homage to Christopher Reeve's legendary portrayal of Superman while managing to prove scene-after-scene that he now owns the role.
Brandon Routh?
There is no longer any doubt.
Brandon Routh IS Superman.
Routh and Bosworth have fantastic chemistry. Honestly, not a single performance was anything less than fantastic.
Brandon Routh is perfect in the role, playing Clark Kent as a clumsy, bumbling reporter and Superman as a strong and powerful hero.
Like Apollo come to earth, like Atlas holding the world in the great Rockefeller Center sculpture, Brandon Routh’s Superman has a gravity that enobles this entire two-and-a-half hour picture.
If you have any misgivings about the castings, as I've already mentioned, Brandon and Kevin are unbelievably good so count on many chills going up and down your spine. Watching them is like watching the comic come to life.
Superman4ever said:Here are some spoiler-free reviews of the movie: Basiclly, the movie rocks harder than we can imagine at this point in time!![]()
http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=7528
http://news.bostonherald.com/blogs/stephenSchaefer/?p=63
http://hollywood-elsewhere.com/archives/2006/06/i_saw_superman.php
http://supermanhomepage.com/news.php?readmore=2149
http://www.bluetights.net/news.php?id=314
Desk said:Why can't it appeal to and satisfy both casual movie-goers and also the large existing fanbase by remaining respectful of its source material?
Or are you suggesting that crafting a film that does this is beyond Singer's capabilities? If so, then he was the wrong man for the project.