Foster Kid Taken From Parents Who Refuse To Teach Homosexuality

Jplaya2023

Superhero
Joined
Jul 9, 2005
Messages
5,313
Reaction score
0
Points
31
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=489285&in_page_id=1770

article said:
They are devoted foster parents with an unblemished record of caring for almost 30 vulnerable children.



But Vincent and Pauline Matherick will this week have their latest foster son taken away because they have refused to sign new sexual equality regulations.
matherickSWNS2310_468x448.jpg
Vincent and Pauline Matherick: Face being struck off despite fostering 28 times


To do so, they claim, would force them to promote homosexuality and go against their Christian faith.
The 11-year-old boy, who has been in their care for two years, will be placed in a council hostel this week and the Mathericks will no longer be given children to look after.
The devastated couple, who have three grown up children of their own, became foster parents in 2001 and have since cared for 28 children at their home in Chard, Somerset.
Earlier this year, Somerset County Council's social services department asked them to sign a contract to implement Labour's new Sexual Orientation Regulations, part of the Equality Act 2006, which make discrimination on the grounds of sexuality illegal.
Officials told the couple that under the regulations they would be required to discuss same-sex relationships with children as young as 11 and tell them that gay partnerships were just as acceptable as heterosexual marriages.
They could also be required to take teenagers to gay association meetings.
When the Mathericks objected, they were told they would be taken off the register of foster parents.
The Mathericks have decided to resign rather than face the humiliation of being expelled.
Mr Matherick, a 65-year-old retired travel agent and a primary school governor, said: "I simply could not agree to do it because it is against my central beliefs.
"We have never discriminated against anybody but I cannot preach the benefits of homosexuality when I believe it is against the word of God."
Mrs Matherick, 61, said they had asked if they could continue looking after their foster son until he is found a permanent home, but officials refused and he will be placed in a council hostel on Friday.
She said: "He was very upset to begin with. We are all very close, but he's a mature young man and he's dealing with it."
The couple, who have six grandchildren and one greatgrandchild, are both ministers at the nonconformist South Chard Christian Church.
When they first started fostering they took in young single mothers and their babies.
More recently they have been caring for children of primary school age.
Mr Matherick added: "It's terrible that we've been forced into this corner. It just should not happen.
"There are not enough foster carers around anyway without these rules.
"They were saying that we had to be prepared to talk about sexuality with 11-year-olds, which I don't think is appropriate anyway, but not only that, to be prepared to explain how gay people date.
"They said we would even have to take a teenager to gay association meetings.
"How can I do that when it's totally against what I believe?"
Religious campaigners say the couple are the latest victims of an equality drive which puts gay rights above religious beliefs.
Christian, Jewish and Muslim leaders have complained that the rules force them to overturn long-held beliefs.
The Mathericks are planning to fight their case in the courts with the backing of the Lawyers' Christian Fellowship.

The same organisation is backing Christian magistrate Andrew McClintock who resigned from the family courts in a row over gay adoption.
He says he was forced to resign because he was not allowed to opt out of cases where he might have to send a child to live with gay parents.
Read more...

The Mathericks' case comes at a time when there is a chronic shortage of foster parents, who work on a voluntary basis.
An extra 8,000 are needed to plug the gaps in the service.
Researchers have found that continually moving children from home to home can have a devastating impact on their education and general welfare.
But a report last year revealed that the shortage of carers meant that some children in care are being forced to move up to three times a year.
David Taylor, Somerset County Council's corporate director for children and young people, said: "No decision has been made about the deregistration of Mr and Mrs Matherick. "The council is committed to promoting the interests of children and young people and welcomes foster carers from all backgrounds and faiths."

man that's messed up
 
They could also be required to take teenagers to gay association meetings.
what??? who the hell does that anyway ??? why are people pushing their crap on 11 year olds??
 
haha i love the name 'nonconformist' when it is applied to church. its just so... oxymoronic.

wait so bullet you agree with the 'mathericks' (which sounds gay as hell if you pronounce it right, ironic)?
 
I'm not at all pleased with this new required legislation, but I'm very proud of this elderly couple for putting God first, even in a world that's slowly killing itself through rejection of Him. It's nice to see someone standing for the faith, regardless of the cost. Pretty sad they lost their foster kid, though; that's just wrong, in every definition of the word.
 
haha i love the name 'nonconformist' when it is applied to church. its just so... oxymoronic.

wait so bullet you agree with the 'mathericks' (which sounds gay as hell if you pronounce it right, ironic)?


i dont agree that its anyway necessary for teens to go to "gay meetings", that is ironic in itself ...its saying gay people are just like us but we have to have special meetings to discuss their situation.
 
I don't think they're required to "teach" it, I think they were just required not to discourage or hide it.
 
In this day and age, you better be prepared to talk with your 11 year old about sex and sexuality. They need to have some idea of it by that age at least because with teen pregnancy on the rise, sexual predators, and general ignorance, you need to arm them with some type of knowledge before they are exposed to it.
 
they should have a genreal idea bu not know all the details.
 
I'm not at all pleased with this new required legislation, but I'm very proud of this elderly couple for putting God first, even in a world that's slowly killing itself through rejection of Him. It's nice to see someone standing for the faith, regardless of the cost. Pretty sad they lost their foster kid, though; that's just wrong, in every definition of the word.

You seem to forget that, for all your religion's horrible, horrible past (including OT and NT), Jesus was mostly a figure of acceptance. You think that, if he was real, he would be condemning those who stood up for gay people? The same guy who said, "blessed are the poor?" Regardless of whether he was or wasn't the Son of god, and you know my thoughts on the subject, he was a revolutionary figure as far as the good-will morality goes.

By the way, the world seems just fine. 'Cept for global warming, and all that. And, pollution. But, Bible says its okay, so...

*washes hands of it*
 
matherickSWNS2310_468x448.jpg


Those children should be thankful they got away from that.
 
they should have a genreal idea bu not know all the details.

It doesn't have to be graphic or hands on :woot: , but it definitely has to be more than "don't have sex before you get married"
 
those hogwarts parents are crazy..... they dont deserve children...lol

though i think the gay association meetings are a bit extreme myself
 
I think the gay association meetings would be for cases when the kids is gay.:huh:
 
The government should only force people to go to meetings when it's part of the terms of probation
 
I don't understand why people are forced to accept homosexuality. Most people don't agree with it, so why do they HAVE to say it's OK?

These people have taken care of 30 children, given them love when no one else was willing to do so, and now they're being denied another kid because of some agenda?
 
the parents are stupid though... they could just sign the contract and teach their son that gay is wrong anyways..
 
then they'd be hypocrites. which is worse.:huh:
 
Or just tell their foster kid that while the religious beliefs that they subscribe to (the term "they" excluding the kid) thinks homosexuality is a sin, no person should be discriminated against because of it.
 
the parents are stupid though... they could just sign the contract and teach their son that gay is wrong anyways..

No, cause they're standing up for what they believe in. It's wrong to force someone to accept something that a majority of society disagrees with.
 
No, cause they're standing up for what they believe in. It's wrong to force someone to accept something that a majority of society disagrees with.

its just paperwork.. they could keep believing in what they want...
 
No, cause they're standing up for what they believe in. It's wrong to force someone to accept something that a majority of society disagrees with.

I think you should rephrase that. The majority of society doesn't always make the best choices.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,164
Messages
21,908,474
Members
45,703
Latest member
BMD
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"