Green Lantern Script Review

What's the problem with Armie Hammer being 21? There is something called make-up to older him. If he get the acting chopps, people should be cool with it.

And Routh and Bale won't be on the FRICKIN JLA MOVIE! Get over it!

who says they won't 10 years from now.

and come on, armie hammer? I'M A VERY OPEN MINDED DUDE, but this 'actor' is not clicking with me. Once, I never went "Okay, he'll do" or "Okay, he might do a good job. Never thought of him." NOPE
 
who says they won't 10 years from now.

and come on, armie hammer? I'M A VERY OPEN MINDED DUDE, but this 'actor' is not clicking with me. Once, I never went "Okay, he'll do" or "Okay, he might do a good job. Never thought of him." NOPE

Hasn't he been a lead in a film before?

Hammer's more qualified then Megan Gale.
 
there was something about that particular cast where I wasn't confident about any of the choices. But I have nothing against Miller if he's the top pick for Green Lantern; it just didn't work out and I won't have a lame 'fanboy' grudge, like how some have against Burton (and Superman).
 
there was something about that particular cast where I wasn't confident about any of the choices.
But I have nothing against Miller if he's the top pick for Green Lantern; it just didn't work out

Agreed.

and I won't have a lame 'fanboy' grudge, like how some have against Burton (and Superman).

Miller fits GL more then Burton ever did with Superman.
 
victoria_nile.gif

"in denial"
"in da Nile"

It took me waaaayyy too long to figure that one out and I now feel incredibly dumb.

Thanks, Keyser for lowering my self esteem. :csad:
 
well, we will find out later next month (according to that variety article) to see what gets made first, and who will be making them..I hope Miller gets the job.

I'm also wondering about Super Max too, and where it's going.
 
I Would only like individual movies before ''JLA'' if they we're really good like ''Green Lantern'' and ''Green Arrow'' promisse to be. And if they get made before the world's end in 2012.
 
Hasn't he been a lead in a film before?

Hammer's more qualified then Megan Gale.

Well, he was Student #2 in an episode of Arrested Development. And a character called "Male Prefect" in the movie Flicka. I'm not sure either of thsoe count as leads.
 
Well, he was Student #2 in an episode of Arrested Development. And a character called "Male Prefect" in the movie Flicka. I'm not sure either of thsoe count as leads.

I'm probably thinking of the Superman actor then. I know one of them was a movie lead.
 
Well i dont think miller is likely to be director for Gl, i think those article only alouded to it possibly happening. More likely or not they will keep bertlanti on the film as director or give it to someone else. I do really do hope we get the details from the summit talks. And if any films are likely to be happening in the next few yrs nolan bat3 is first to happen by 2011, and out of the recent stuff gl/ga seem to be the ones that will happen.
 
Well I see they pretty much went the way I'm going in my version.

My main problems are 3 words.

Guy, Friggen Supes.

The way I'm going looks to be the same but Stewart instead of Guy, Bruce Wayne instead of Supes, and I totally have Barry Allen and Oliver Queen in mine.

Guy Gardner is a much more interesting John Lantern than John Stewart. He was one of the people that the ring considered and would have gotten it, if he were closer. Plus he's the #1 Green Lantern in the Corps. John Stewart has to be the least important Green Lantern of the 5 main Green Lanterns.
 
It sounds like it has a lot of potential based on what was revealed. Though I sorta wish if they're going with Hector Hammond as the film's main villain, they throw in a 'muscle' villain such as the Shark.
 
Guy Gardner is a much more interesting John Lantern than John Stewart. He was one of the people that the ring considered and would have gotten it, if he were closer. Plus he's the #1 Green Lantern in the Corps. John Stewart has to be the least important Green Lantern of the 5 main Green Lanterns.

Well sorry, I didn't want Spike Lee asking me where the black Green Lantern be at? :grin:
I dunno I find Stewart way more fascinating, and I personally think he makes a way better foil for Hal.
 
John Stewart and Guy Gardner are both awesome. I Think the least of my favorites it's Kyle Rayner. But i still like him ALOT.
 
There yah go, let's agree that Stewart and Gardner are both awesome characters.

and that Kyle sucks. (Aww he's a good kid, he just got so far away from what he could have been)
 
Whedon was such a popular choice with fanboys when he signed on to direct, write and produce WW. But the guy had such a hard time writing the script and went nowhere with it.

Whedon wrote at least one finished script.

After that he kept giving them synopses of future scripts. Only they weren't giving him any direction other then saying they don't like what he was doing and not explaining what they wanted changed.

There didn't have passion for the project, either.

Any writer could get frustrated under those conditions. Thats why he left.

Joel Silver, the guy who owns the WW film rights, doesn't have any idea where to go with the property. How can a film get made when the people in charge don't know anything about what they're adapting and show no interest in learning it?

He seems more interested in making a Plastic Man movie with the Wachowski's then this.

All of this was discussed in detail on the Whedon/WW movie threads.

Whedon would make an even better director for WW then writer. he just needs the right script to work from. WB should hire some Battlestar Galactica (Ron Moore), Doctor Who (Paul Cornell) or Mutant Enemy (David Fury, Tim Minear) writers who get the franchise more then he does.
Conversely, Berlanti seems like an odd choice for GL because of his resume, but apparently he nailed the script.

That means Berlanti has the writing chops for GL, not the best director for the project.

Experience or not, the main concern would be that his schedule doesn't give him very much time to direct. So the ideal situation would be that he stay on as a producer or whatever and get another director that does have time and experience.

Agreed.

Speaking of "small-time" directors moving up to blockbuster superhero franchises, don't forget about David Dobkin (Shanghai Knights, Wedding Crashers, Fred Claus), who is signed up to helm the Flash. That is, if it ever gets off the ground.

Dobkins has a better resume for Flash then Berlanti has for GL. Most fans are still uneasy with him as the director.

Or there's Peter Segal (Adam Sandler comedies, Get Smart), who is on Shazam.

Shazam can be a comedy. That's why its different from most super-hero adaptions. Segal can do great relevant updates on old franchises and make good action movies. He did both with Get Smart. Berlanti doesn't have anything close to that in his directing resume.

Last I heard, not much has been done on the Flash script and Shazam is still in the scripting stage. So GL is obviously a lot further along.

Agreed.
 
''Shazam'' will not be a comedy, and, as far as i'm concerned, the script is finished, but the movie is slow-almost-stopping, so slow Peter Segal might directed ''War hounda'' before this.
 
Guy Gardner is a much more interesting John Lantern than John Stewart. He was one of the people that the ring considered and would have gotten it, if he were closer. Plus he's the #1 Green Lantern in the Corps. John Stewart has to be the least important Green Lantern of the 5 main Green Lanterns.

What's a John Lantern? :o

But yeah, I agree. Outside of Bruce Timm's cartoon, he really isn't important in the DC Universe. Kyle, Sodam, Guy, and even Hal are more significant Green Lanterns than John is.
 
What's a John Lantern? :o

But yeah, I agree. Outside of Bruce Timm's cartoon, he really isn't important in the DC Universe. Kyle, Sodam, Guy, and even Hal are more significant Green Lanterns than John is.

Which is honestly just frustrating, especially since Dwayne Mcduffie is on the JLA comic right now and able to write for John again. I was hoping he would be able to bring him more in line with what they did in the series, but so far I haven't seen any of that.
 
''Shazam'' will not be a comedy, and, as far as i'm concerned, the script is finished, but the movie is slow-almost-stopping, so slow Peter Segal might directed ''War hounda'' before this.

The reason that "Shazam" isn't getting off the ground yet is because after the WGA strike ended, John August had a backlog of scripts that needed re-writing (before "Shazam"), and so it'll probably take a while before any updates on "Shazam" will emerge.
 
Dobkins has a better resume for Flash then Berlanti has for GL. Most fans are still uneasy with him as the director.

In the director's chair or not, Berlanti will be the creative mind behind GL, similar to what David S. Goyer has done for the Nolan Batman series.
 
In the director's chair or not, Berlanti will be the creative mind behind GL, similar to what David S. Goyer has done for the Nolan Batman series.

I'd be fine with that.

But I do not think he should be in the director's chair when they start shooting scenes.

GL needs its own Nolan. Berlanti is not that guy.
 
I could see Henshaw in another Green Lantern movie destroying Coast city,

It would be great.

but I don't think they should wait and introduce him in a Superman movie(partly because it'd never happen).

I don't see how they can avoid it with that character. He's a clone of Superman that's permanently welded to Krytonian technology. It makes more sense for Henshaw to show up there.

I do like the idea of him being a clone of Hal instead. They could make a movie just about that.

Personally, I think Henshaw is a stronger GL villain than a superman one.

Agreed. Unfortunately the character's origin is to tied to Superman not to be used there first.

This is a reason I'd like WB to show more of his great rogues gallery in the movies beyond Lex and Zod.

Yeah that screen time could work further the story, but if there were two movies simply based on Sinestro Corps,

Even with 2 movies with long run times it's a very big story to tell no matter how many movies they put it in.

It's got enough to deal with without adding Henshaw to the mix unless he's been set up in prior films, they have time to use him or if they ever want to use him at all.

then that'd be enough time to flesh out Henshaw and explain his reason for joining in the first place.

Not necessarily.

No, I personally like DC better than Marvel, but their movies would be a LOT better if they took the obvious choice marvel did and started making more flicks that strived for accuracy.

I disagree.

I realize that not everything could be kept in an adaptation. I'm not going to say everything should be kept, but those things that we all know would never show up, are really a shame to lose.

It is shame but an unavoidable one. Films can only run so long, it depends on what the film makers want to explore.

Plus, I think little cameos and references to other DC characters would make sense because Hal Jordan mainly just patrols his planet, going all over the world all the time.

Cameos would be fine with me.

But the GL franchise is so full of great characters they can do plenty from their own franchise without adding the rest of the DCU into it.

Places like Metropolis and Gotham are bound to pop up and the characters are bound to interact.

They would appear only if the film makers want them to show up.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,265
Messages
22,075,971
Members
45,876
Latest member
Pducklila
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"