bullets
bang bang
- Joined
 - Sep 24, 2005
 
- Messages
 - 28,444
 
- Reaction score
 - 0
 
- Points
 - 31
 
Weird that the sheriff in RZHalloween.. IS CHUCKY.. MAUAHAHAHAHA
also weird he survived and loomis didnt
Weird that the sheriff in RZHalloween.. IS CHUCKY.. MAUAHAHAHAHA
/\ Exactly, comically enough, prior to Zombie's Halloween I had an idea of remaking the film in a similar way that Zombie remade Halloween. Focusing part of the movie on seeing who this guy was prior to becoming Chucky, if we know more about him it might make him more creepy and more able to take it seriously- unless, it was never meant to be taken seriously?
Don Mancini was aware of how comedic the concept was, but there was atleast some intent of darkness to the tone of the first 3.
The past 2 are outright comedies, and Mancini actually wanted the next one to be a musical.
Honestly, I'd love to see more of a backstory to Ben Willis, the fisherman killer from I Know What You Did Last Summer. Despite the explanations in I Still Know What You Did, I'd love to see his transformation into becoming vengeful (before the hit-and-run).
That's one thing the movie had going for it, a killer who's actually scary.
a musical?? what a moron . who would want that?also ,seed of chucky was a load of garbage.
I agree. It would seem a bit off for a kid these days to want something like a Good Guy Doll. What made that premise work in the original, was that alot of parents went absolutely nuts over getting their kids those Cabbage Patch Kids dolls during much of the 1980's. And to make such a much loved symbol of kids into a possessed killer wanting to take over the body of a young boy obviously struck a chord with audiences back then. Currently, I dont see the same kind of premise working as well.i dont think chucky would work though. it would seem odd if a boy got a good time doll. i would of liked to see a little more of charles lee ray in the first one but not half the movie. anyways chucky rules.
a nightmare on elm st remake would be good but i'd feel wrong about having someone else take over for robert englund.
He's one of the most underrated characters ever.
Muse Watson is great, and the backstory of what he did to his wife make him very real and added to his menace.
Disappointed the hell out of me that he never even got a proper trilogy, that direct to video "lets turn Ben into a text messaging ghost and replace him with a ****ty actor" third installment makes the first two look like absolute masterpieces.
P.S. Was there a way for Michael to know Laurie was his sister in the original? Other than he is all-knowing evil, I mean.
Of course you could say they weren't in the original but the second was written directly by Carpenter, so that was is pretty much cannonized with the original (albeit we can fortunately ignore all the sequels afterwards). Just saying.
In the original, Michael is meant to be the embodiment of fate (ie. the scene where they're discussing the pesonification of fate as Michael stands outside the classroom).
I don't think that symbolism was there to him in the remake.
hopefully its remade in 2013... then my plan will be complete. MOST major slasher remakes will have come out 29 years after they're original release...
![]()

That and, unlike Michael and Jason, Freddy's only been portrayed by ONE actor.
CFE
would you want freddy recast though? Unlike Michael and Jason.. Freddy had a personality and spoke..
	thats the man Robert Knepper the next Freddy
![]()
is that him?t:
t:
![]()

I hope they do freddy remake
I don't. I don't want anyone but Englund in the role. The day he dies is the day the character should be retired IMO.