Hancock

Rate the movie

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
It was only a 12 hour shoot, and that was for a flashback scene. I doubt it will alter teh rating.
 
yeah this is bad news. they are basicly now changing the movie to make it fit the standtards. bad news IMO.

I don't think they did that much reshooting. Nothing that would drastically alter the film, anyway.
 
That's what some guy wrote who was in the crowd. He said it was a flashback scene cause alot of the extras were given 80's style clothes.
 
That's what some guy wrote who was in the crowd. He said it was a flashback scene cause alot of the extras were given 80's style clothes.
yet bateman gives him the suit in the present time.
 
yet bateman gives him the suit in the present time.

Well someone brought up a point that perhaps Will wore that suit before, hence the "fits kinda tight" line or whatever it is.
 
interesting. yeah could have been an old suit.
i giess we will have to see.
 
If you can't conceive of Will Smith and Charlize Therone can have a R-rated scene together, then you, my friend, simply lack imagination. :woot:



Wow... you can't see how cutting R-rated themes can leave a movie without cohesive direction or originality? I mean, come on, dude.

On the reshoots:
If Hancock used to wear the costume "back in the day" then his comments of "I'm not wearing that" and "It's a little tight" make more sense... and are a bit funnier.

ummm a sex scene would have been very akward... Charlize is married to bateman's character and has a kid (not her kid, but still a kid) and doesn't end up with hancock soo it'd feel kinda akward.

I've actually seen this movie man, i know what there working with.

He didn't use to wear the costume, he doesn't remember his past at all (which is a huge plot of the film). and is given his costume by batemans character. So "back in the day" he didn't have that costume.
 
That's what some guy wrote who was in the crowd. He said it was a flashback scene cause alot of the extras were given 80's style clothes.

which doesn't make sense, because in the cut i saw he has no memory of his past... he first realized he had powers when he woke up in a hospital 80 years ago... sooo unless he played hero in the 80's then it doesn't really make sense. esp some event had to of happened between the 80's and 00's to make him feel so depressed...

the rape scene... could possibly have been the sex/ejaculation through the roof scene... which consisted of a very horny girl wanting sex with a drunk hancock... she could have ended up being underage... she left in a hurry after hancock "finished" in the cut i saw.... him finding out she was underage could have been a possibility.
 
thanks for the spoilers. i was really glad to read them..............sarcasm.
 
You should put some of that info in spoiler tags though.

Re: His past. Maybe they're adding to it with the re-shoots, and maybe he did in-fact have the costume back in the day?

There could have been more filming in secret besides the public filming in Times Square, so who knows what they're changing/adding.

Exactly. Reshoots = bad news!

Not always. Sometimes it can be a good thing for a film :up: We'll see...
 
which doesn't make sense, because in the cut i saw he has no memory of his past... he first realized he had powers when he woke up in a hospital 80 years ago... sooo unless he played hero in the 80's then it doesn't really make sense. esp some event had to of happened between the 80's and 00's to make him feel so depressed...

the rape scene... could possibly have been the sex/ejaculation through the roof scene... which consisted of a very horny girl wanting sex with a drunk hancock... she could have ended up being underage... she left in a hurry after hancock "finished" in the cut i saw.... him finding out she was underage could have been a possibility.

That's what im saying....people on set said the re shoots were flashbacks with people wearing 80's clothes
 
Huh...What time was this? I was right there on saturday.
 
which doesn't make sense, because in the cut i saw he has no memory of his past... he first realized he had powers when he woke up in a hospital 80 years ago... sooo unless he played hero in the 80's then it doesn't really make sense. esp some event had to of happened between the 80's and 00's to make him feel so depressed...

Dude. Talk about turning your brain off.

According to you, and everyone else that has seen this movie, he has no memory BEYOND him waking up in hospital, 80 years ago.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think the 80's is equivalent to being 80 years ago or above. You'd think he'd memories of the 80's, no? I mean, I have memories of the 80's, and I was born in the 70's. :o

And yes, there may be a chance he played hero in the 80's. I mean, he's had his power all this time, right?

:dry:
 
Chance nothing. Look at the pic in that link. It was definitely his original costume.
 
Dude. Talk about turning your brain off.

According to you, and everyone else that has seen this movie, he has no memory BEYOND him waking up in hospital, 80 years ago.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think the 80's is equivalent to being 80 years ago or above. You'd think he'd memories of the 80's, no? I mean, I have memories of the 80's, and I was born in the 70's. :o

And yes, there may be a chance he played hero in the 80's. I mean, he's had his power all this time, right?

:dry:

gah.... it's so frustrating talking to people who haven't seen it... yes beyond 80 years... but the cut i saw implied he's been in depression and never really played superhero. With an 80's flashback, that adds even more confusion because you now have to throw in a situation that makes him depressed. The back story that needed to be added was prior to his memories.. not post memory loss
 
I was being facetious with that remark, in deference to this statement:



^All I could think of was Bill Engvall saying: "Here's your sign."

:o im not an idiot, ive seen the god damn movie, i, as stated am obviously aware he could have had the costume before... the movie implied it to be not so... and like i said in previous post, adding an 80's flashback doesn't solve matters.. just adds more to the problems
 
gah.... it's so frustrating talking to people who haven't seen it... yes beyond 80 years... but the cut i saw implied he's been in depression and never really played superhero. With an 80's flashback, that adds even more confusion because you now have to throw in a situation that makes him depressed. The back story that needed to be added was prior to his memories.. not post memory loss

Damn dude.

You act like you have a total grip on this movie, just because you saw an EARLY cut.

Relax your sphincter man.

Let the people actually working on this movie worry about the creative stuff, and don't worry about losing your "position of authority" with this movie, since there are actual scenes you haven't seen now. :whatever:
 
Damn dude.

You act like you have a total grip on this movie, just because you saw an EARLY cut.

Relax your sphincter man.

Let the people actually working on this movie worry about the creative stuff, and don't worry about losing your "position of authority" with this movie, since there are actual scenes you haven't seen now. :whatever:

well i guess you just had to be there then... the execs were not happy and seemed very concerned as if they knew it was going to fail anyway... one even told me she felt it's a lost cause... so whatev... i just get tired of people acting like i don't know what i'm talking about
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,383
Messages
22,094,919
Members
45,889
Latest member
Starman68
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"