read my post again, where I state that if two movies were exactly the same, exactly the same (as in exactly the same), just one live action and the other animated, I would prefer the live action one, and so would a majority of the audience, IMO.
Yeah, dude, the only part of your posts I do not understand is your signature line, which i guess is French Latin for 'I count my money as I sit on the toilet, I dicatate my earning into a video camera as I plop.'
What I was doing was asking you to re-examine what you just said, maybe you were not thinking what you said through properly.
So i'll ask you again, more clearly and precisely.
You've seen the Wallace and Gromit shorts/movie right? Some of the most famous animations in the world.
Do you really think it would be funnier, to just have some live action bald comedian fall down a chute and start putting cheese on some crackers?
If you do, I would think you had quite a bland sense of humour, because a lot of the humour in those scenes come from the animated cartoon expressions of the clay models, expressions that are not doable by real life humans, as no-one looks like that! I don't care what those kids who hang out down by my local shops say!
and that is part of the appeal of animation, just one of the pros. If you replicated that kind of thing in live action much would be lost in translation.
The bloomin Flintstones car in the old 60s cartoon looks much better and funnier in cartoon form than John Goodman using his big fat twinkle toes to get himself to the drive in.
You see what i mean?