FCEEVIPER
Rubber bullets. Honest
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2004
- Messages
- 10,276
- Reaction score
- 23
- Points
- 33
Or the green pit turns out it has nothing to do with the film itself.I'm going to laugh when this photo turns out to be faked.
Or the green pit turns out it has nothing to do with the film itself.I'm going to laugh when this photo turns out to be faked.
I'm not ashamed of anything. I would love it if the Lazarus Pit was introduced just as it is in the comics, but I simply don't believe it will happen. The reasoning why the pit could be introduced given in this thread, I don't agree with, because it's flawed thinking.I hadn't realized so many fans were so dismissive and outright ashamed of a core aspect to Ra's story. I wonder if this is more of an aversion to the supernatural, or to this misguided fear that Nolan's world loses its integrity by the inclusion of such elements.
Well, as is, the Pits don't have much to offer by means of plausibility. Or is it remaining unknown how you'd prefer it?JAK®;20263825 said:I'm not ashamed of anything. I would love it if the Lazarus Pit was introduced just as it is in the comics, but I simply don't believe it will happen. The reasoning why the pit could be introduced given in this thread, I don't agree with, because it's flawed thinking.
Right now, I just think Nolan should make this movie the way he wants to make it. This is his last movie, so there's no point in changing the rules now. I would have no reason as a fan to object to him adapting the pits as they appear in the comics, but as a viewer it would confuse me why all of a sudden there are supernatural elements in a formerly grounded story.Well, as is, the Pits don't have much to offer by means of plausibility. Or is it remaining unknown how you'd prefer it?
Suddenly? I don't think it's really possible to gradually introduce that into a universe. There's a distinctive line that separates the two. Once you cross it, that's it.JAK®;20263933 said:Right now, I just think Nolan should make this movie the way he wants to make it. This is his last movie, so there's no point in changing the rules now. I would have no reason as a fan to object to him adapting the pits as they appear in the comics, but as a viewer it would confuse me why all of a sudden there are supernatural elements in a formerly grounded story.
Which is why it's strange to introduce it now.Suddenly? I don't think it's really possible to gradually introduce that into a universe. There's a distinctive line that separates the two. Once you cross it, that's it.
Yes you can. It's called consistency. Have you not heard of Deus Ex Machina? It's frowned upon for a reason.I think it's unfair to consider it as retroactively changing the rules. Clearly the pits were not relevant to the story of BB, so its existence was not necessary. You can't expect they provide a complete, unedited, and ubiquitous set of established rules all from the get-go.
Comics are a serial format that last decades, with different artists and writers. There is more breathing room for this sort of thing.Readers were fine with it in the comics. In the coming weeks, you'll see that everyone else was fine with it while watching Thor. By next year when Avengers hits, that line of thinking will be in the extreme minority.
Don't you dare accuse me of being one of the Nolan zealots. I'm aware of the mentality you're talking about, and I've criticised it in the past. The fact is, Nolan has made these movies realistic from the beginning. Not as realistic as some stupid fans would have you believe, but realistic nonetheless. I'm not saying that Nolan will never do such a thing, but there's no indication that he will.I would heavily applaud Nolan for getting this far considering how it all started. And especially when fandom has taken it upon themselves to box this universe in to standards that they've created and falsely attributed to Chris.
Deus Ex Machina is a whole different breed. It's a plot device created out of thin air in the last moment. It's frowned upon because by nature it's lazy and exists only as a means to solve some impossible scenario. That has nothing to do with introducing a new element to the game, that still functions under the same governing rules.JAK®;20264175 said:Which is why it's strange to introduce it now.
Yes you can. It's called consistency. Have you not heard of Deus Ex Machina? It's frowned upon for a reason.
It's not about breathing room as there is little space to gradually introduce and explain it. You're either in a world where the supernatural exists, or you're not. Telling it in story #3,584,228 is no different than doing it in #3. The same hurdles exist.Comics are a serial format that last decades, with different artists and writers. There is more breathing room for this sort of thing.
TDKR can function as that film. The Pits aren't nearly as intrusive or as complex as an entire mythical world. It's relevant to one character and for the most part is exclusive to the Batman lore. There isn't this extensive history that bogs things down. Literally takes an entire minute for the concept to be properly introduced and understood.Thor has absolutely nothing to do with it. Yes, the Marvel Universe has had no supernatural elements until he came along. The difference is he has a film to himself to justify that. It's a continuing, universe building narrative. It's not like it was Iron Man 3 and suddenly he's fighting Fin Fang Foom.
I haven't. You will note I didn't specify any specific person(s). I was criticizing the mentality, nothing more.Don't you dare accuse me of being one of the Nolan zealots.
Conflicting statements.I'm aware of the mentality you're talking about, and I've criticised it in the past. The fact is, Nolan has made these movies realistic from the beginning. Not as realistic as some stupid fans would have you believe, but realistic nonetheless. I'm not saying that Nolan will never do such a thing, but there's no indication that he will.
Nolan spent half of Batman begins justifying why Bruce dresses up like a bat. There's no way he's going to introduce a magic pit that brings people back from the dead, as awesome as it is.
Signed.I hadn't realized so many fans were so dismissive and outright ashamed of a core aspect to Ra's story. I wonder if this is more of an aversion to the supernatural, or to this misguided fear that Nolan's world loses its integrity by the inclusion of such elements.
Or the green pit turns out it has nothing to do with the film itself.
They set no precedent that they are not either.
Nothing, and I mean nothing in Nolan's movies have come close to the type of fantasy as the Lazarus Pit. Fear toxin is not even in the same hemisphere of fantasy as a pit of chemicals that revives a person to live for centuries. It is magic. Total and utter fantasy. Right up there with Clayface and Man Bat.
LOL, it's cute that people thought the greenscreen was the Lazarus Pit.
Why would Nolan have to CG a Lazarus Pit? It's just a bunch of bubbly liquid. If he could make a Batmobile that works, he could boil some green water.
LOL, it's cute that people thought the greenscreen was the Lazarus Pit.
Why would Nolan have to CG a Lazarus Pit? It's just a bunch of bubbly liquid. If he could make a Batmobile that works, he could boil some green water.
JAK®;20261103 said:Fear gas is a hallucinogen, it causes you to experience fear and paranoia. There are several real life drugs that do similar things.
A microwave emitter that vaporises water is also theoretically possible. They messed up by not having the microwave have a negative effect on humans, but that's movie science for you.
Phones emit signals, and they do have the capacity to track your location, TDK stretched those facts by making them emit sonar.
There is no real life equivalent of the Lazarus pit. The pit is pure magic, and has always been presented as magic. It's a different thing entirely.
You don't have to have a plane to use an ADS weapon, which some would commonly refer to as a "microwave emitter", even though they don't use actual microwaves.
But encase you don't know, here's the definition, Bill Nye:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Denial_System
http://www.skewsme.com/energy_weapons.html
And they look like this:
![]()
[YT]xyTehuk5p2c[/YT]
You can also look up more links to ADS weapons, and again, if you watch the BB extras, you'll see that Nolan even used these as reference to his movies. But hey, what do I know, these can only be used on planes, and not controlled by the Humvees like they normally are, because everybody would melt, especially when people are operating them from the Humvees like normal.
Could they make the beam hotter, and have the effects similar to what we see in BB? Of course, but hey, that's apparently "nigh impossible". As apposed to what you're saying about the Pit, I'm sorry, but ADS weapons are real, while a Lazarus pit is not, which, is why I rolled my eyes. To say they are far less plausible is laughable. And that's my point: Who are you to say that technology is less plausible than actual fantasy?
Hallucinogens? Check.
ADS/microwave emitter? Check
Lazarus pit? ..............
I really don't know what it is(I don't think it's the pit), but I'm not following your logic. You say Nolan doesn't have to use CG because The Tumbler isn't in CG(even though there are shots where it is), but at the same time, he's using that green screen for CG.LOL, it's cute that people thought the greenscreen was the Lazarus Pit.
Why would Nolan have to CG a Lazarus Pit? It's just a bunch of bubbly liquid. If he could make a Batmobile that works, he could boil some green water.