Superman Returns How the new suit might be explained (speculation)

i just want to qute sandy collora from this link: http://popcultureshock.com/features.php?id=942

''It lacks power, presence and an overall cohesiveness that makes it somehow look like someone dressed up like Superman, but it's not SUPERMAN.''

in your face sandy collora :o
thumb_SupermanReturnsGotMilk_IVAN%7E1.jpg
 
buggs0268 said:
Again, not to start an arguement or anything, just as historical reference, he did say there was a muscle suit when Warner's was clearly saying there wasn't.

Again, no, they weren't. Come one, prove Singer or WB said there was no padding, rather than just some USA Today reporter.
 
Wesyeed said:
how come singer uses everything from the donner movies but the suit. This perplexes me.


Singer dosent use everything from the donner films.
 
Mentok said:
Singer dosent use everything from the donner films.

Yeah, I don't think it helps to explain this to some. For some reason there are a few who have a hard time grasping what Singer is doing. He's using the movies as a vauge history, which has been said a countless number of time on the boards and in interviews. Oh well. I'm eating some Town House crackers, so its good. :up:
 
Bottom line for is I DON'T CARE if he's wearing padding or not - the suit looks good regardless. Who cares...............
 
Milkman95 said:
Bottom line for is I DON'T CARE if he's wearing padding or not - the suit looks good regardless. Who cares...............


elementry my dear doctor milkman,Massive fanboys do.

:D

But i agree with your statement,my good man.

:)
 
Milkman95 said:
Bottom line for is I DON'T CARE if he's wearing padding or not - the suit looks good regardless. Who cares...............
thats what i have been saying. routh looks good in the suit.IMO :up::)

but: fact is that the padding is everywhere. but does it matter? it will matter if it looks fake in the movie. if not that they did a great job.
 
ROBOCOP CPU001 said:
elementry my dear doctor milkman,Massive fanboys do.

:D

But i agree with your statement,my good man.

:)

Yup - Oh no, he's wearing padding, the world is ending............As long as Singer and Routh capture the essence of Superman, we're good.

Did Spider-man fans boycott those films because Maguire is wearing a muscle suit? Nah, didn't think so...........
 
dark_b said:
thats what i have been saying. routh looks good in the suit.IMO :up::)

but: fact is that the padding is everywhere. but does it matter? it will matter if it looks fake in the movie. if not that they did a great job.

Exactly, people seem to act like it has to be his body only, when a suit like that really doesn't show off the full definition. The Spiderman movies had painted on muscles.
 
Milkman95 said:
Yup - Oh no, he's wearing padding, the world is ending............As long as Singer and Routh capture the essence of Superman, we're good.

Did Spider-man fans boycott those films because Maguire is wearing a muscle suit? Nah, didn't think so...........



Well, Fanboys move in mysterious ways.:o
 
Metropolis_Man said:
Yeah, I don't think it helps to explain this to some. For some reason there are a few who have a hard time grasping what Singer is doing. He's using the movies as a vauge history, which has been said a countless number of time on the boards and in interviews. Oh well. I'm eating some Town House crackers, so its good. :up:

Are you talking about me? What the... I know about vague history (if that's what they want us to believe). What I'm talking about is how much of the old movies made their way into the curren one. I'm not part of some eveil underground cult of people who just want to bash movies all day whoever you are. I asked a question because it's plain as day seems like everything from the donner films made a smooth transition to the new movie except the suit, even brando who's dead and in the ground right now is coming back. Then I logged into the hype to talk to my good friends here that I've been with for about a year, and ask if there's some how an explanation for what my eyes see here, mine, not mine and some other people I don't know. All I know is what I see. and Mentok told me that not everything is linked to the old movies. He didn't elaborate, but if Mentok said it it has to have some truth to it, I bet. I've read his stuff for a long time and he's not much for bs.
 
Metropolis_Man said:
Exactly, people seem to act like it has to be his body only, when a suit like that really doesn't show off the full definition. The Spiderman movies had painted on muscles.
and a muscle suit under the costume. but with the spidey suit it was easier because the webbing did hide it. with superman it is harder.

but oyu know what? i was not following the fantastic four movie. and this month i just found out that the torch was having a muscle suit. i never noticed this in the movie.
 
Wesyeed said:
Are you talking about me? What the... I know about vague history. What I'm talking about is how much of the old movies made their way into the curren one. I'm not part of some eveil underground cult of people who just want to bash movies all day whoever you are. I asked a question because it's plain as day seems like everything from the donner films made a smooth transition to the new movie except the suit. Then I logged into the hype to talk to my good friends here I've been with for about a year if there's some how an explanation for what my eyes see, mine and Mentok told me that not everything is linked to the old movies. He didn't elaborate, but if Mentok said it it has to have some truth to it, I bet.:confused:
singer also changed metropolis. it will look nothing like NY.
 
dark_b said:
and a muscle suit under the costume. but with the spidey suit it was easier because the webbing did hide it. with superman it is harder.

but oyu know what? i was not following the fantastic four movie. and this month i just found out that the torch was having a muscle suit. i never noticed this in the movie.

Chris and Ioan both had muscle suits, it makes the suit look smoother and better.

Any you're correct about Spider-man, I was on the set for the first film as an extra, and even helped the stunt guy put the damn thing on - I guarantee you that Maguire's muscle-suit is a lot more defined than Routh's.......
 
dark_b said:
singer also changed metropolis. it will look nothing like NY.

You're mistaken there - the production designer did in fact use templates of NY.........:up:

It will be kind of like Nolan's Gotham, which was a combination of Chicago, London, and film sets, but Singer's will by Sydney, NY, CGI, and sets.......
 
And theres nothing wrong with the suits looking like that, it would be hard to convey such definition through that material. Its understandable why they do that. I've had no gripes about it. They could make it look like the comics if they painted the persons body and outlined the muscles in black, but would we want that?
 
Milkman95 said:
You're mistaken there - the production designer did in fact use templates of NY.........:up:

It will be kind of like Nolan's Gotham, which was a combination of Chicago, London, and film sets, but Singer's will by Sydney, NY, CGI, and sets.......
ok i will post different. it will not loos like NY. but it will have buildings from NY.

and when you look at gotham you dont see chiccago. you see only the buildings. the city has a different ''feel''.
 
dark_b said:
i just want to qute sandy collora from this link: http://popcultureshock.com/features.php?id=942

''It lacks power, presence and an overall cohesiveness that makes it somehow look like someone dressed up like Superman, but it's not SUPERMAN.''

in your face sandy collora :o
thumb_SupermanReturnsGotMilk_IVAN%7E1.jpg

Sandy Collora is 100% right ! I dont like te costume,but I like the Trailer and it looked great, so what. His upper body is way too thin, the "S" is too small. Maybe they can change a few things for the sequel.

Collora did a great job on Batman Dead End.
 
a wider neckline would probably take your attention off the lean-ness of his upper body i think.

Think about that for next time, Singer.
 
Sandy Collora 100% right? - this is the guy who used cheap-ass spandex costumes (which just don't work anymore) for his films? His Superman? Now that costume looked like someone dressed up as Superman, but not Superman - if anytrhing does - and he put it on a bodybuilder, no less.

SR's costume looks just fine to me. Milkman95 - I agree with you 100%. Routh looks great as Clark and great a Superman.

Who cares if there is a little 'augmentation' in the suit? It looks good and will look even better in motion up there on the big screen.

:up:
 
dark_b said:
i agree wit h your post. but i dont agree with the trailer. i dont belive that singer knew that the trailer will be in may and that he would than said april.this would than be menan. and this would than have nothing to do with protecting the movie. it would just made the fans mad. so i think he thought that the trailer is coming out in april.

but with other i agree.

Whether he was hiding it or not remains to be seen. The point is that things change and directors are not immune to bending the truth. I just don't understand the "Singer is a liar" attitude that Collara is strutting around with. He needs to relax and focus on working on his artistic craft before he can act like he has any hand.
 
Collera..just thinks if it looks like the comic people will like it..

How wrong he is.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"