Black Narcissus
8 | 24
- Joined
- May 2, 2012
- Messages
- 35,432
- Reaction score
- 14,249
- Points
- 103
This has an 80million+ budget.

I loved it, too.Bummed cause I really loved it. Saw it again tonight and the audience loved it too.
When I saw a trailer for this movie I was surprised. What I had read about PT Barnum historically was less than flattering. This glossy movie showing Barnum as this underdog trying to find the American dream and creating show business. OK. Like what about all the animals he slaughtered and treated terribly?
In today's age they never should have used Barnum as a basis for a movie unless it was a warts and all biopic. This should have been total fiction (which it was anyway) based film with a smattering of influence of Barnum's life but not naming Jackman Barnum.
When you do a biopic you're rarely showing the ****** side of the protagonist unless they were explicitly known to be villainous to all. Straight Outta Compton left out a LOT of stuff that Dre and Eazy did that was less than genial.
When I saw a trailer for this movie I was surprised. What I had read about PT Barnum historically was less than flattering. This glossy movie showing Barnum as this underdog trying to find the American dream and creating show business. OK. Like what about all the animals he slaughtered and treated terribly?
Which biography? A legitimate one or one that he constantly rewrote himself to make him look better?Hugh Jackman and the director said during interviews that this is not a biopic. The movie never even tried to sell itself as a true story. Even the trailer only says "inspired by" true events. The whole idea was -- how would Barnum have wanted to retell his story if he was alive in 2017? He did rewrite his autobiography multiple times to make himself look better each time, after all.
How would Barnum rewrite his autobiography in 2017? He'd certainly want to make a spectacle out of his life and make himself look like a better person than he was. He'd probably cast someone as good looking as Jackman in the role.
As for the "Barnum was a terrible person" argument, that is simply not true. People are using the standards of 2017 to judge a man from the 1800s. I read his biography once, and while Barnum did some terrible things, he also did a lot of good things. In the end, Barnum was simply a flawed human like everybody else. He regretted how he treated Joyce Heth, he eventually joined the abolitionist movement and spoke out adamantly against slavery, leading to one of his museums getting burned down. He befriended the head of the Society for the Protection Against Cruelty to Animals and even donated much of his estate to this organization through his will. He did genuinely love his wife, Charity - even though he didn't always treat her well. The real bearded lady actually did use her place in his show as a platform to speak out against the public calling them freaks. The real Tom Thumb became good friends and business partners with Barnum. Barnum also has several quotes that ARE in line with the Barnum in this film - celebrating people for who they are and not their skin color or disabilities. I think the revisionist history would actually be to paint him as a villain and abuser. He was not - at least not by the standards of the time in which he lived. And he was loved by the people.
People clapped at the end of my showing, too, this is a real crowd pleaser!I saw it with my mom yesterday, and we enjoyed it. Yeah, it was kind of bonkers and definitely a *kinder* portrayal of Barnum himself, but the music was good, song & dance Hugh is always neat to watch, and it was fun to spot all of the Broadway show actors in the cast. Hell, Keala Settle nearly walked off with the whole movie.
And yeah...our show was pretty much sold out too. People clapped at the end.
Well this bombed.
Has Jackman had a successful movie outside of X-men? I cant really think of any except maybe Les Miserables
People clapped at the end of my showing, too, this is a real crowd pleaser!
Which biography? A legitimate one or one that he constantly rewrote himself to make him look better?
I can't understand why this is under-performing, all the ingredients are there for it NOT too.