POWdER-man
Ancient but wise
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2004
- Messages
- 13,182
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 56
I told you mother ****ers not vote out Mee. Now you all will lose.
No one voted Mee out....

I told you mother ****ers not vote out Mee. Now you all will lose.
In the event of a tie before there are four contestants remaining, a revote among the non-tied contestants will occur, in which the only candidates for elimination are the tied players. If the revote does not resolve the tie, and the vote is thus determined to be deadlocked between two or more players, a two minute discussion will commence in which the non-tied players must come to a unanimous decision as to who should be eliminated. If a unanimous decision is not reached within two minutes, the tied players are granted immunity and the non-tied players (except anyone who has won individual immunity) are forced to choose rocks out of a bag without looking. The player who chooses the differently colored rock is eliminated.
In the event of a tie at the final four, a revote will occur (However in Survivor: Gabon, a revote did not occur in the final four and it went directly to the fire-making tie breaker challenge), but if the revote does not resolve the tie, the tied players will face off in a challenge. In Palau, Panama, Cook Islands and Gabon, this challenge was a fire-making contest. In Marquesas, the random rock tiebreaker was used at the final four, which host Jeff Probst later admitted was a mistake.[4]
In the very rare case that a tribe prior to the merge is down to two players, as in Palau, those two will also face off in a challenge to determine who is to leave the game. This has only happened once to date.
I Like this.....Though I still think The OTHER tribe should decide who goes. Makes the game interesting.Survivor tie breakers.
I know wikipedia isn't fool proof, but that's all I could find.
I Like this.....Though I still think The OTHER tribe should decide who goes. Makes the game interesting.
Fine, since you guys all seem to be so in favor of it, from this point on, your opponents will pick who goes if you cannot. It seems rather stupid to me, being as it ensures your stronger player goes...but, if that is what you guys want.
Fine, since you guys all seem to be so in favor of it, from this point on, your opponents will pick who goes if you cannot. It seems rather stupid to me, being as it ensures your stronger player goes...but, if that is what you guys want.
It's better than a Penguins game deciding it.
No, this is stupid. Don't fall for the pressure Matt.
Peer Pressure is a *****No, this is stupid. Don't fall for the pressure Matt.
NoHow ****ing stupid are you people, really? Give the other tribe a chance to eliminate a player in the case of a tie. Jesus Christ, is Alex the Great even in this game?
Not really. It gives a tribe power over yours. I wouldn't want another tribe controlling my fate in the game...but, since this is what you guys want...so be it.
We already knew that :heartbroken:You guys realize the hockey game thing was probably a joke right. Goddamn, this is probably the stupidest thing since me backstabbing Matt to happen in Survivor. I hate all of you.
It makes the game more interesting IMO
oh well, your call Matt.
By the way, fair warning for everyone, from this point on, ties will be broken by Penguin game scores regardless of game time, so study the Pittsburgh Pens damnit![]()
:heart:
You guys realize the hockey game thing was probably a joke right. Goddamn, this is probably the stupidest thing since me backstabbing Matt to happen in Survivor. I hate all of you.