Whirlysplat
Superhero
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2006
- Messages
- 5,414
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 56
The Question said:Except, he has shown to be in need of food to survive. Simply not as much as we do. One Million is the only contradiction of that I've ever seen.
So there we are he doesn't need to eat.
The Science of Superman lol, Wolvertons book had so many contaradictions to the comics it was pulled and is now out of print, how Stern allowed his name on it i'll never know, he did a bigger version I believe which tried to rectify things, which I have not read. The powers in Wolvertons were far less Super than Supes as I remember. I will look for a review.
Edited with review found, I thought this was another place that reffered to the psionic element and I was right.
of 1 people found the following review helpful:
Somewhat Interesting, November 6, 2003
Reviewer: Gary Riley (Webster, TX United States) - See all my reviews
Yes, the title of the book is an oxymoron. In spite of this, the author does a fairly good job of examining Superman's powers from a scientific view. I found the background material a bit more interesting than the explanations of the superpowers, primarily because the explanations gave Superman powers far less super than those he has in the comics. Still, there were a few interesting observations, such as that in order to pick up an object such as a large ship, Superman must not only have the strength to lift the ship, but must also have some power which prevents the ship's mass from breaking it in two. I found the explanation of Kryptonite to be particularly disappointing: it's dangerous to Superman, but even more so to Earthlings. Overall, if you're a comic fan you'll probably enjoy reading the book, but it didn't turn out to be as interesting as I thought it would.
As Yahman and I keep stating real Science doesn't work for Supes lol.
- Whirly

