If Raimi goes to The Hobbit...howabout Peter Jackson for Spider-Man 4???

Discussion in 'Spider-Man Sequels' started by Advanced Dark, Jan 28, 2007.

  1. Advanced Dark Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2005
    Messages:
    17,593
    Likes Received:
    1
    ^ I'd say he's alone in that opinion.
     
  2. Mr Jide Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2005
    Messages:
    5,000
    Likes Received:
    0
    I know there are many directors out there filming their own comic book movies but lets be real here, getting a new director isn't as hard as you make out. Spider-Man is hot property and although some may feel overwhelmed by the prospect of directing it, there's plenty of talented directors out there that can do the job. No need for sony to think outside the box, people will come running.
     
  3. supermarvelman Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    Raimi will be the director dont worry about it.
     
  4. Catman Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    Messages:
    29,046
    Likes Received:
    1
    As long as it isn't Brett Ratner I'll be fine.
     
  5. Advanced Dark Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2005
    Messages:
    17,593
    Likes Received:
    1
    Why? Ratners a proven director who's films make loads of money at the box office consistently. If you don't like his films your opinion is not a reflection of the rest of the World outside of SHH. Regarding X3 it's not like Ratner had alot of time to get ready for that film since he was hired last second. To me he did an amazing job all things considered including Singer taking his writers with him with almost no notice to Fox.
     
  6. blind_fury Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2003
    Messages:
    13,584
    Likes Received:
    0
    The Phantom Menace also made a billion and it sucked horribly.
     
  7. blind_fury Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2003
    Messages:
    13,584
    Likes Received:
    0
    Both of these directors are terribly overrated.
     
  8. Catman Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    Messages:
    29,046
    Likes Received:
    1
    The Rush Hour films are pretty cool and Red Dragon was awesome. X3, however, was a different story. I liked the movie but Ratner was basically work for hire. They could have just hired anyone and the movie would have been the same. We need a director who's talented and will continue what Raimi did, but at the same time will do his own thing. You know...put his own stamp on things.

    Like I said...their are exceptions. Phantom Menace wasn't one of them.
     
  9. DACrowe Registered

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2000
    Messages:
    30,766
    Likes Received:
    615
    Ratner has no soul. All of his movies (even though I enjoy the Rush Hour films) are vacant empty products made for the sole reason to earn money. They are devoid of any artistry or creativity or general care for the subject, characters or story. Sometimes actors or the screenwriter can overcome him (see Red Dragon) but often not (see After the Sunset, Money Talks, arguably The Family Man and now X3).

    X3 was a stuiod committee movie that epitomized what people don't like about Hollywood. They took a big property that has fans, ignored the fans (knowing they'd pay to see it anyway, b/c let's be real, comic fans are sheepish when it comes to this stuff), and sat down and put in whatever idea they liked to increase the product's marketability (getting rid of characters that are in way of the sexy name stars, making sure it is a short running time so they can sequeeze in more showings, avoid too much diaogue or depth so as to get to the SFX and action to appease mass audiences with eye candy easier), etc.

    After Bryann Singer, who managed to make two quality films in the studio system that played their game but also paid homage to the material and above all else were intelligent and well made movies with heart and soul....it ish ard to swollow what essientially was a Big Mac in movie consumerism.

    The Spider-Man movies have avoided becoming just a brand name (though there is no denying they are) and have some artistic merit with good acting, direction and for the most part solid, sharp writing (more the second than the first). It is likely the next director wil lbe one to hire on the fly to get that 2009 release date and that means probably a "workman" like Ratner who just does what the studio wants to get his paycheck and then they can get their's as well.
     
  10. lordofthenerds Not a Goddamn Side-Kick

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    Messages:
    11,626
    Likes Received:
    40
    :huh: Uwe Boll? McG? Joel Shumacher?
     
  11. Jasmine Registered

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    11,553
    Likes Received:
    0
    Agreed.
     
  12. Catman Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    Messages:
    29,046
    Likes Received:
    1
    You actually think they'll be considered? :huh: I was referring to people who actually had a shot at this.
     
  13. Mr. Socko Registered

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    23,325
    Likes Received:
    0
    The entire world would be in an uproar if Schumacher directed Spider-Man.

    I won't even speak of the dreaded toilet Boll.

    But you've got to look in the unlikely places! Before Spider-Man, how many of us would have said Sam Raimi, director of Evil Dead and Dark Man, should direct the Spider-Man movies? Barely any.
     
  14. supermarvelman Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    I dont know, the directing was pretty bad, things felt soooooooooooooooo rushed, the scenes sucked. In the director commentary, he took out a couple pretty good scenes, for stupid ass reasons.
     
  15. supermarvelman Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,763
    Likes Received:
    0

    Very true.
     
  16. lordofthenerds Not a Goddamn Side-Kick

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    Messages:
    11,626
    Likes Received:
    40
    No you were refering to anyone but Ratner, but they do have just as much of a shot of directing the movie as Ratner does.
     
  17. Catman Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    Messages:
    29,046
    Likes Received:
    1
    Boll is universally panned and Schumacher did Batman & Robin. Ratner has a bigger shot of directing Spidey 4 than they do.
     
  18. Visionary Registered

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2000
    Messages:
    16,080
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yet, you bought the DVD? :confused:
     
  19. supermarvelman Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yea, the promblem is? I liked the movie, barely. But the directing sucked and the movie was very disappointing, and I really bought it hoping for some cool extra scenes so...
     
  20. supermarvelman Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    **** that, the Spider-Man franchise is buy far my favorite comic franchise. Ratner was good for Rush Hour but Ratner didn't have 40 years of comics to live up to.
     
  21. Visionary Registered

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2000
    Messages:
    16,080
    Likes Received:
    0
    RATNER Says: Gotcha! :)

    I actually liked X3, although, I wouldn't want Ratner directing SM4. I think if they're going to get another director, in a hugely successful franchise, get someone with some really good or great movies under his belt or/and a style and talent that you know will have a better chance of delivering something great. There are other directors much better than Raimi, you just have to look for them, and not just grab the first director who wants to direct it. That's where MARVEL and SONY comes in, they need to do their part, especially MARVEL.
     
  22. Odametal Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    421
    Likes Received:
    0
    Maybe someone like James Cameron, or David Fincher.
    But lets face it, theres a lot of directors that never made a blockbuster movie and could make a great job.
    Ex:Christopher Nolan, Brian Singer, even Sam Raimi.
     
  23. Visionary Registered

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2000
    Messages:
    16,080
    Likes Received:
    0
    True. And that's just it, when I say a really good or great director, I'm not talking in terms of having a Blockbuster movie under their belt. There's plenty of qualified directors for SM4, and they don't need to be a big named director either.
     
  24. Mr. Socko Registered

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    23,325
    Likes Received:
    0
    Cameron was going to direct Spidey back in the 90s. He had plans of Arnold as Doc Ock.
     
  25. cujo66 Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2006
    Messages:
    118
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hey, I want Peter Jackson for everything, The Dark Knight, Wonder Woman, The Hulk 2, Dukes of Hazard 2. Say what you will, he makes a movie look good, except for the slow motion shots, I hate those, oh and I don't think Spidey would work in New Zealand.

    But he can't do The Dark Knight Returns, that's gotta be Robert Rodriquez.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"