Sandman138
Avenger
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2003
- Messages
- 11,644
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Sandman since the movie is about war, what would you have them fight with. I mean back then all they had were spears and sword, as far as penetrating go, what would you have them do with spears and sword. I guess you wanted to see more kunfu fighting with those sword and spears. I guess If they had done that you would still say it was homoerotic, due to all the long stick banging. I guess there is a hidden path, that in the next few month you will find. I guess someone will be penetrating your fiery gate, or would you rather he flanked you from behind.
First, I'm queer and and comfortable with my sexuality and even if I was straight that insult is pathetic at best. Second, yes, this is a sword and sandals epic so I expect to see spears and such. That doesn't mean that they didn't make the metaphor obvious. Plus, if you couldn't see the sexual attraction between Stelios and Astinos, then I don't know what to tell you. Third, I never once said this was a bad thing. I would've been pissed if it wasn't in there. This is a movie about Greece and the culture was homoerotic. I had more of a problem with their depiction of the Oracle, as it was incredibly inaccurate for the sake of what seems to be misogynistic satisfaction. Fourth, I liked the damn movie. I had fun, it was hot, it tickled the alpha-male in my prostrate. Why do you have a problem with the movie being homoerotic or hypersexualized?
P.S: It's called a question mark it's that key next to your right shift button.