Images in Signatures

Status
Not open for further replies.
We can have Youtube MOVIES but we can't have a picture like the one I posted above? Yeah, That makes sense.:whatever:

It does actually, YT vids don't take up any SHH bandwidth or slow pages down, once a person clicks on the YT link they are using YT's bandwidth not SHH's.
 
Why don't you let it be images from an image uploading service like Photobucket. You'll be using their bandwidth and not SHH's
 
Why don't you let it be images from an image uploading service like Photobucket. You'll be using their bandwidth and not SHH's

Because lazy people would just hotlink, and then their signature would be that stupid frog pic, if not straight out porn.
 
Most forums allow users to choose if they see the sigs or not... it's the users choice. In another forum when I had very low bandwith I said "no don't show them", now that I have a larger bandwidth I said "yes, I want to see them". That option plus limiting the size (to say 480x150) could really help...
 
Most forums allow users to choose if they see the sigs or not... it's the users choice. In another forum when I had very low bandwith I said "no don't show them", now that I have a larger bandwidth I said "yes, I want to see them". That option plus limiting the size (to say 480x150) could really help...

It's not happening. Ever. Get over it.

jag
 
Because lazy people would just hotlink, and then their signature would be that stupid frog pic, if not straight out porn.

but you can't hotlink images when there is a certain file size limit involved.

Most forums allow users to choose if they see the sigs or not... it's the users choice. In another forum when I had very low bandwith I said "no don't show them", now that I have a larger bandwidth I said "yes, I want to see them". That option plus limiting the size (to say 480x150) could really help...

this is another good aspect! - people can chose not to see images in sigs so both sides win.

but i guess it's up to them.
 
I think if teres an option to see them, file and size limit then it would work out.
 
I have a user bar for my sig :D but you have to click it to see it :(
 
this "Little Foot" user is annoying, since he's not aloud to post a sig picture, he just posts a giant picture of Little Foot after all of his posts! It's so freaking annoying.

A-Man
 
this "Little Foot" user is annoying, since he's not aloud to post a sig picture, he just posts a giant picture of Little Foot after all of his posts! It's so freaking annoying.

A-Man

don't recall you carping when Bison did it and just block the pic then you won't have to see it
 
this "Little Foot" user is annoying, since he's not aloud to post a sig picture, he just posts a giant picture of Little Foot after all of his posts! It's so freaking annoying.

A-Man
Agreed, not too fond of his posts either...
 
this "Little Foot" user is annoying, since he's not aloud to post a sig picture, he just posts a giant picture of Little Foot after all of his posts! It's so freaking annoying.

A-Man


So what?


Oh, are his posts too intelligent???? :cwink:
 
OK to answer this.
No, images will NEVER be allowed in signatures, take up to much space.

End of story.
Closing
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,317
Messages
22,084,702
Members
45,883
Latest member
marvel2099fan89
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"