CristoTheSecond
Civilian
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2007
- Messages
- 639
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
dats what theys gets for tricking Eve.
Well, ever since that incident in the Garden of Eden, snakes have been getting bad publicity. Tis a shame.

dats what theys gets for tricking Eve.

PBS puts videos of lions killing buffalo on the television.![]()
Please, you know that's not the same.
In the video I'm watching one animal being preyed on while two jerks with a camera watch with glee. At least a PBS Nature special serves an educational purpose. This was just for sport.
Bull, how many times can you watch a lion rip a buffalo to shreds before you've got it figured out? The difference is PBS hides behind the veal of education. But what people watch it for is to see animals kill each other.
Bull, how many times can you watch a lion rip a buffalo to shreds before you've got it figured out? The difference is PBS hides behind the veal of education. But what people watch it for is to see animals kill each other.
First of all, the animals we see on those PBS shows aren't domesticated. They're in the wild, and they don't always get their kill. The snake in the video is something the guy bought from a store, and it doesn't need to feed on a live animal.
Many snake charmers remove the fangs or the venom sacs from their snakes, because it is too dangerous. This practice is illegal, and is considered inhumane to the snake.
Cobras don't always inject venom when they bite something. They can do a "dry bite" if they want to.
You're watching two animals brutalize each other.
So people who own snakes shouldn't feed their snakes live prey because it gives you the willies? It's exactly that attitude that's messed up in your society. I swear people have been watching too many Disney movies.
stop being an ass. it's not the same.

Bull, how many times can you watch a lion rip a buffalo to shreds before you've got it figured out? The difference is PBS hides behind the veal of education. But what people watch it for is to see animals kill each other.
Or you could stop catching feelings over a natural process that's been going on for millions of years.![]()
that wasn't a natural process, that wast just cruel.
The other day I noticed that there was a news article about someone's pet snake who bit a toddler. People were acting like this was the world's biggest tragedy and such, obviously it's not good. But has anyone realized that children and hundreds of times more likely to be attacked and killed by the family dog?
No, because no one would ever want to depict dog's in a bad light. But the facts are that dogs are statistically one of the most dangerous animals in the world. Besides, if you think that snakes are family animals and are supposed to be interacting with children you're an idiot. The parents are the one's who are ultimately responsible, snakes aren't domesticated animals.
there are two options here:
1) you are stupid and don't get it
or
2) you are an ass and don't want to get it
