ShadowBoxing
Avenger
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2004
- Messages
- 30,620
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 31
If you believe the North was better than the South when it came to racism...thats the dumbest thing I have ever heard...stryfe said:
Although escaping to northern and midwestern cities did bring an end to the most overt forms of Jim Crow for southern blacks, the North was not a "promised land," one completely free of racial strife. Many white city dwellers bitterly resented the influx of blacks, and violent race riots erupted all over the nation from 1890 to 1945. Major ones occurred in East St. Louis, Houston, Chicago, and Tulsa in the years 1917 through 1921. In nearly every case black people defended themselves and their families against roving mobs of white racists.
I mean you realize FDR's favorite movie was Birth of a Nation right...OMG...you really don't think the North was just as bad...they probably worse, because at least the South admitted they were racist...I mean c'mon the largest concentration of KKK was Ohio...they ran most of the sheriffs offices.
I mean the north was like a friggin bear trap. They were like "yeah come here you'll be free"...CHOMP!. Next thing you know you were lynched for looking at the new england woman the wrong way....It was just as bad up there, they just did not have slavery...but they beat the crap out of you anyways.