I hope this doesn't end up looking like a Sin City rip-off. Hopefully it'll stay true to the comics (in vision and story).
How can the same writer/director rip-off his own style?
And so far things aren't looking good.
No one understood Eisner better then Miller. I have complete faith in him.
No one understood Eisner better then Miller. I have complete faith in him.
Nothing I've seen about this project looks like Eisner at all.
Frank Miller, Mike Ploog, Tim Sale, Darwyn Cooke, Bruce Timm, Matt Wagner, James O'Barr, Jeff Smith, Dave Sim, Michael T. Gilbert(Mr. Monster), Paul Pope, and Sam Keith(with The Maxx), they are all excellent Eisner followers with their own touch.
I guess there are looser definitions of 'understanding Eisner' just as some folks believe SInger 'understands Superman.'
.....well, Singer certainly did understand Donner's Superman and it showed. That's what he was going for.
The artists I mentioned are very Eisner influenced. Ofcourse, being influenced does not necessarily mean copying exactly what the influence did.
No, the fact is SInger DIDN'T understand Donner's Superman. At least the content of the character. In the Donner films Superman does EVERYTHING he can for Lois's benefit. In SR, the first chance he gets, he screws her over. Sorry, it's the exact opposite. Sorry you don't understand Donner's films either.
Did we see the same film? How did he screw her over, exactly? Look, don't answer. This is not the Superman forums and your answer will not convince me anyway. Besides, I can see you did not understand SR, and that's your fault not Singer's.
Please keep Singer's failure out of here!!!
And i said this months ago, but everyone said "Frank Miller will respect Eisner's vision" I see no respect so far.