BatLobster
Trailer Timewarper
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2012
- Messages
- 16,501
- Reaction score
- 10,721
- Points
- 103
Gorgeous.
I liked the "train on a farm" thing too. Mainly because that's something I could believe a trained warrior saying in a battle with someone who...grew up on a farm. I liked when Zod swung superman around by his cape for the same reason. Who wouldn't do that to a dude wearing a giant cape if they could? Superman was asking for both of those insulting things, lol.
I loved the overall look of the movie as well. (here are some screenshots I took)
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
but I still much prefer Phister's work in TDKT.
Say what you will about MOS, but the cinematography was beautiful and downright stunning in parts. So many images from that movie stay with you.
Another poster a few months back noted that Snyder puts huge effort into making every shot look like an Alex Ross painting, and I think that more than anything is what makes me glad he's the director in charge of building the DC Cinematic Universe.
Some of these complaints about the dialogue...(shakes head)
But then "Where did you train? On a farm" is an example of great dialogue?
Whatever.
Sometimes I think people just want more quips.
Conversations, dialect and observations are "terrible". But "one liners"? That's where its at.
A lot of people do just want more quips though. Hence the popularity of the avengers, a lot of people have argued it's a hilarious movie.
I would argue MOS' greatest faults is focusing too much on 'meaningful dialog'. It took away from the human element of simple interaction. Practically every other line only served to progress the story or impose life maxims through forced monologues.Meh.
Marvel overloads on the quips. I'd like some quips and banter for Daily planet scenes, but otherwise, I just want more meaningful dialogue between characters.
I was responding to Kevin Smith, post #812.
I would argue MOS' greatest faults is focusing too much on 'meaningful dialog'. It took away from the human element of simple interaction. Practically every other line only served to progress the story or impose life maxims through forced monologues.
The sequel could use moments of levity and pure, "unimportant" exchanges.
For me "meaningful" means character exchanges like two people sitting down and talking about their situations/feelings rather than those story progressors or life maxims. Basically, normal conversation between two people. To me, this is more meaningful than hearing Jor explain Kal's powers. It shows who these people are. So, I guess we really agree on this.
And a great writer can have scenes accomplish both tasks simultaneously![]()