we all should be glad that we're not getting that comical criminal genius as a Lex Luthor that we saw in the previous interpretations of the character.
Nope.Yes.
You're not happy with the casting?
This is the most interesting thing ive heard all day regarding this news.So Wayne may represent the old rich and Luthor the new?![]()
It's because i dont like the actor.Calling it gross before we've seen anything involving Eisenberg. I'm sure that's logical.
Not at all, id be super annoyed with Nolan because i just don't like Jesse Eisenberg. I find him irritating and plays every character the same way.But if Jesse had a role in TDKR, you'd worship him.![]()
What the heck are you even saying?Thank god... one username popped up as a "Negative Nancy". So at least now I know 30 people in the thread is actually going back & forth with at least 1 person IN HERE that fits that crybaby whiner that needs to shut up/wait & see, accept Eisenberg as Luthor, & learn from the lesson taught by thy great Heath Ledger. I'm definitelybut even that one person isn't really like THAT. Just like a person isn't necessarily a scrotum-worshiping Nolanite for liking TDK trilogy; just because you don't care for this particular casting choice, doesn't mean you're a whiny crybaby that thinks the studio should cave to your every whim (who on here is even acting remotely like that at all? Is there actually even ONE user like that on here?) Like the Shadows Fall album, its a War Within or better yet, like ATR's album, A War You Cannot Win.
we all should be glad that we're not getting that comical criminal genius as a Lex Luthor that we saw in the previous interpretations of the character.
Well, that was unexpected....... and freaking awesome.
Eisenberg is a very good actor with a phenomenal 'range', and, because of his age, should bring something to the role that we haven't seen before.
So anyway I love that we are getting a younger Lex. Sometimes it's like Snyder is reading my mind....sometimes.
I've never been specific on Lex's age, but I think having a billionaire that is this young could be interesting on screen. It's kind of an interesting parallel to superman.
Lex has achieved a billion-dollar empire by the time he's in his thirties.
Superman has saved the world by the time he's in his thirties.
Both young men in the prime of their lives. If superman didn't exist, Lex would be the pinnacle of success thus far.
That's actually a good shot of him.He just looks like a guy who could snap at any moment and stab you in the neck with a pen, at least in that picture.
I want to see Lex use the media to turn public opinion against Superman. Maybe he personally funds the rebuilding of Metropolis while publically blaming Superman for Zod's rampage. That could be interesting and a different version of Luthor than we've seen in the movie before.
that should absolutely be a part of it.
I was thinking a youthful 35-45 so JE is actually 5 years younger than my age range but the point is I just wanted a youthful Luthor for once. Not because I'm youth obsessed and hate seeing old people on screen, I just thought it would be different to go in a different but still good direction for once.I've never been specific on Lex's age, but I think having a billionaire that is this young could be interesting on screen. It's kind of an interesting parallel to superman.
Lex has achieved a billion-dollar empire by the time he's in his thirties.
Superman has saved the world by the time he's in his thirties.
Both young men in the prime of their lives. If superman didn't exist, Lex would be the pinnacle of success thus far.
I like Joaquin Phoenix, but Eisenberg has far more 'range', which opens many more doors as far as Lex's characterization is concerned.
I like Joaquin Phoenix, but Eisenberg has far more 'range', which opens many more doors as far as Lex's characterization is concerned.
