KillerWolf
Possibly partially drunk
- Joined
- May 13, 2014
- Messages
- 18,661
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Yeah, that's why I think this could work out in the end. Fingers crossed.
Fingers crossed, indeed.
Yeah, that's why I think this could work out in the end. Fingers crossed.
We really haven't, Kevin Spacey's Lex was not goofy. If you include live action TV we have gotten different takes on Lex there. Michael Rosenbaum essentially evolved into what the STAS Lex was aswell so we've even had that version. The problem is people want a specific version of Lex. None of the other Lex's have been like Eisenberg.
We really haven't, Kevin Spacey's Lex was not goofy. If you include live action TV we have gotten different takes on Lex there. Michael Rosenbaum essentially evolved into what the STAS Lex was aswell so we've even had that version. The problem is people want a specific version of Lex. None of the other Lex's have been like Eisenberg.
True. And I think there's a possibility we'll get to experience a certain meta moment with Lex - same as characters in the film, we as an audience will underestimate him as well and be surprised to finally see him as a genuine threat and not quirky and silly little guy we assumed him to be.
Spacey had is own Donner take........ The whole "WRONNNG!" outburst......He even had his own version of the goofy Ms Tesbacher......and his "real estate" thing....... Sure, he had a sinister moment. But he was too Hackman-esque
That's a great point. There's a few cases of 'meta' moments going on throughout this film it seems. Lol. Or I may just be reading way too much into things.
Spacey had is own Donner take........ The whole "WRONNNG!" outburst......He even had his own version of the goofy Ms Tesbacher......and his "real estate" thing....... Sure, he had a sinister moment. But he was too Hackman-esque
No, cause Kevin Spacey's Lex yelled "Wrong!" once and rolled the R in Kryptonite while he was torturing Superman. He was like, PURE CAMP.
I wish people would learn what camp means. I really, really do.
That's a great point. There's a few cases of 'meta' moments going on throughout this film it seems. Lol. Or I may just be reading way too much into things.
t: Also, I think it's kind of pathetic that a man showing some energy and enthusiasm is deemed campy as a character, or "over the top".
It's like no fanboy has ever met a businessman, a salesman, someone duplicitous, etc. They're quite often bright, enthusiastic, full of energy, and they're often very "fake" in public. Using your hands to make a point is Public Speaking/Business 101. It's not "over the top" or camp.
I love that about this version of Lex. He's saying what it means, but it has at least two meanings.
He's very much the smartest guy in the room. At least he thinks he is.
Jesse mentioned this a while back. Luthor in this film will say exactly what he means, and not be lying exactly, but have a hidden meaning to almost everything he says.
Hackmanesque in terms of the character's motivations, which were supposed to be an evolution of Hackman's Luthor. Not in terms of his portrayal of the character.
Lex Luthor has had a "female accomplice" for like, ever. It was a staple of the corporate businessman comic book Luthor to have various female accomplices until Mercy came along and became the go-to girl.
We really haven't, Kevin Spacey's Lex was not goofy. If you include live action TV we have gotten different takes on Lex there. Michael Rosenbaum essentially evolved into what the STAS Lex was aswell so we've even had that version. The problem is people want a specific version of Lex. None of the other Lex's have been like Eisenberg.
Seducing an old dying woman to get her money, and sticking your wig on a family bust as he leaves the bed chamber?
Goofy idiot henchmen? It was fairly campy. Not Spacey's fault, he had to play Hackman's Luthor.
And again, I'm still giving Eisenberg a shot, but right now it's really seeming like familiar territory. That may change, but I woukd have preferred a fresher take. I certainly don't think that's an unfair assessment.
Seducing an old dying woman to get her money, and sticking your wig on a family bust as he leaves the bed chamber? Goofy idiot henchmen? It was fairly campy. Not Spacey's fault, he had to play Hackman's Luthor.
And again, I'm still giving Eisenberg a shot, but right now it's really seeming like familiar territory. That may change, but I woukd have preferred a fresher take. I certainly don't think that's an unfair assessment.
I'm thrilled to be getting a businessman Lex with mad scientist elements.
I think it's going to be something special as the DCCU moves forward. Can't wait.

I know Eisenberg is a bit decisive right now, but can some of us at least agree that it's good that we finally get mad scientist Lex? I for one am overjoyed!
Previous Luthors in live action have had the, "greatest criminal mind" thing going for them but have been more concerned with money as an endgame. It seems the last two movie Luthors have only hated Superman because he impedes his big money schemes, and that any residual animosity he has for Supes is mostly secondary. With this Lex, it's personal...
This Lex Luthor has the potential to be the smartest one we've seen yet. And that's as important to his character as anything imho. A good start if nothing else. Guess we'll have to wait and see.
Also, I think it's kind of pathetic that a man showing some energy and enthusiasm is deemed campy as a character, or "over the top".
It's like no fanboy has ever met a businessman, a salesman, someone duplicitous, fake, etc. They're quite often bright, enthusiastic, full of energy, and they're often very "fake" in public. Using your hands to make a point is Public Speaking/Business 101. It's not "over the top" or camp.
Even in the comics, Lex Luthor is often portrayed, when not being an outright snake, as bright, cheerful, glad-handing, etc.
Can you provide something on this?? Luthor has NEVER been played as cheerful or glad-handing!! Wow......you guys will say anything to pad your argument for these silly portrayals (especially this new one) ......Luthor has always been seriously bitter toward Superman.....motivations may have changed thru the years. But he aint never been cheerful. Even Luthor in Smallville was serious........he got even more sinister as the seasons progressed.
Also, the core characteristic of Lex from the comics is FINALLY being shown on screen (Smallville was close), the one where he wants to be the ultimate being on the planet through his intellect and can't stand it when Supes takes his limelight and thunder away.
It was never the quest for just power, for just fame or for freaking REAL ESTATE (lol XD) but his real motive was to the be the ultimate herald of humanity and to make things in this world how HE sees fit.
He is the Ozymandias of the DC Universe, he spits in the faces of Gods and will do anything to bring them down. And I have a strong feeling we are getting that true Lex this time.