Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]505457[/split]
Out of all of the possible outcomes there are for Lex's fate at the end of this film, which route would you guys prefer seeing taken in the film?
1. Lex being arrested and sent to Prison
2. Lex being on the run and his company's reputation in flames
3. Lex avoiding Prison time, with the Trinity's victory proving to be only a minor setback for him
Honestly... I want Lex to be in prison... SENT THERE BY THE ARTICLES OF EITHER LOIS OR CLARK.
He can be kept on ice, since we know they can find some way to rationalize his presence in another film. I mean... A scene where Jesse, using his genius as Lex alone escapes a Super Max prison would be fun as hell.
On that note, I'm still kind of hoping that he'll have some kind of cameo in Suicide Squad if he ends up going to Prison at the end of this film.
I mean I remember reading rumors about it but nothing ever really came out of it after awhile.
Lex goes to prison at the end of BvS. Then Lex will be on suicide squad sequel .
"Lex [Luthor] is extremely concerned about what Superman represents." He'll be empowered by his role repairing the damage caused by Kal-El's battle with Zod in Man Of Steel. "He's a world-class industrialist and businessman, and he's part of the rebuilding of Metropolis," adds Roven.
Out of all of the possible outcomes there are for Lex's fate at the end of this film, which route would you guys prefer seeing taken in the film?
1. Lex being arrested and sent to Prison
2. Lex being on the run and his company's reputation in flames
3. Lex avoiding Prison time, with the Trinity's victory proving to be only a minor setback for him
If they ever show Lionel Luther in the movie. I wish they would get Clancy Brown to portray him.
His dad's dead in this DCEU. But anyways, showing the bad guy's father (or mother, for that matter) always seems so emasculating for the villain and just plain weird to me. I get that some people liked the character of Lionel on Smallville, but surely showing a Lionel Luthor side by side with a Luthor in his prime (okay, Eisenberg's not exactly fully primed Luthor at this point, but I think we all expect him to be by the end of the film, right?) just feels like it would take away from the character of Lex Luthor, not add to it. It worked in Smallville because that Lex was still finding his place in the world and hadn't fully solidified his hatred for Clark. This Luthor, I'm assuming by the end of the film, will already be fully set in his ways of despising Superman and being his arch-nemesis.
The Lex Factor
Why Jesse Eisenberg is the ideal Luthor for the Nu-Geek generation:
Who springs to mind as Lex Luthor, big brained DC mega0bad with a serious Superman itch to scratch? Gene Hackmans calculating smarm-bucket frim the Richards Donner era? Kevin Spaceys acidic Dr. Evil from the Bryan Singer reboot? That forgotten guy in TVs Smallville who played him with a cod-Freudian backdraft daddy issues?
For Zack Snyder, it was Mark Zuckerberg. When it came to reinterpreting Supermans arch nemesis for his feel-the-real DC aesthetic, the director was looking for a titan of business in a more right-now mound than hairless Machiavellians of yesteryear. So he cast Jesse Eisenberg.
Just from pop-culture view you cant pretend the movie doesnt exist. Snyder says, meaning The Social Network, in which Eisenberg transformed the Facebook billionaire into an icy, tormented Citizen Kane. Because he played Mark Zuckerberg, Jesse represents a very contemporary sort of business model. In the sort of post-dotcom world where fortunes can be made from you basement, it is not hard to imagine Jesse-as-Lex being as powerful as he is.
The 32 year old Eisenberg naturally fuses over so straight a comparison. If there are some surface similarities to another role, an audience will tend to see that. An actor wont. As he points out, for the first years of his rise to prominence as actor, writer, novelists, and New Yorker contributor, he was pegged as a nouveaux Woody Allen. After The Social Network, it was why the arrogant S.O.B.s all the time? Though, says Eisenberg, for me, Lex feels like a totally new and unusual person.
Totally: the voice is Mickey Mouse impersonating Hannibal Lecter, the hair is pre-bleach Kurt Cobain, the age a callow 31, but the big plan is straight out of the old-school puppet-master playbook.
Snyder had met with Eisenberg for another role (was he to be Robin, or a youthful spin on Alfred?) and it just occurred to the director, What about Jesse for Lex? Snyder was well aware how hard it was going to be to shake Hackmans camp wickedness, and Eisenberg felt dangerous to him in a purely intellectual way.
The New York-born actors initial response was that this was surely some clerical error; then he read the script. It was written in a way I would say dovetails with my skills, it was written with a real psychological underpinning, it was written with a kind of humor that I know I could do. And with a dramatic intensity that I enjoy.
Put this Luthor on the couch and youll unearth no daddy issues bar a far more terrifying psyche. He is a young man with two faces. Front-facing is a disarming, witty, Metropolis charmer. He uses wordplay and very clever allusions to other stories and other myths, says Eisenberg, but it never compromises what is scary about him. Which is the other private face: full of rage. What he might lack in superpowers he makes up for in dark determination. He is the guy who wont sleep to get something done.
With the DC expansion in play, Luthor has been infused with some of the nuttier traits of Bat-villainy, the wisecracking psychopathology of the Joker, the self-satisfied clever-clogsiness of the Riddler, and the big-picture scheming of the Penguin. Eisenberg credits writer Chris Terrio with providing an elaborate, off-limits backstory, and the mechanics of Luthors plan caome top of the non-disclosure list. Still, we know that initially he share batmans concerns over the value and danger of a creature like Superman. What, I think, makes the story relevant is this questioning of the value of this kind of power in the real world, says Eisenberg intently. So my character, who has what we would think of as a modern financial success, is threatened by this guy who has power in a supernatural way. Supermans an existential threat to my character,
With Kal-El and Bruce Wayne preoccupied by their philosophical spat, Luthor plays the situation to his advantage. You learn pretty early on that Lex is interested in metahuman existence, notes Snyder, and that there might be some relationship between that investigation and the appearance of Diana Prince (aka Wonder Woman). Luthor also liberates Zods body, and somehow his scheming spells that arrival of Doomsday (the films other other villain) and sacrificing that impressive mane for the obligatory Luthor-look. Could it be that the close proximity of Kryptonite is a contributing factor?
I cant really reveal the circumstances because not only will I lose my own hair I will lose my house, but it is so unusual, skitters Eisenberg, admitting the found it a stimulating experience. To me there is nothing better than to be able to physicalize something in a role because you cant fake it. It really helps to lose yourself in the part. Batman v Superman v Jesses Eisenberg is starting to feel like a fair match.
Honestly... I want Lex to be in prison... SENT THERE BY THE ARTICLES OF EITHER LOIS OR CLARK.
He can be kept on ice, since we know they can find some way to rationalize his presence in another film. I mean... A scene where Jesse, using his genius as Lex alone escapes a Super Max prison would be fun as hell.
However, her priority is definitely the latest scoop. It could be that Lex Luthor is in her journalist crosshairs this time. If the first film found space to ponder the state of journalism in the digital age, this new adventure takes a sidelong glance at how the media can be manipulated by the powerful. “How corporations can use the media,” says Adams, “and different people can use media to spin perception.”
When I read the article Snyder's approach to casting Luthor struck as very similar to the way a lot fans approach their fancasts.
How so? I didn't get that at all.