• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

Joe Wright to Helm 'Pan'

According to a few pages back:
[BLACKOUT]Peter Pan: Hook, we'll always be friends right?
Captain Hook: Sure kid, what could possibly go wrong?
[/BLACKOUT]

I honestly don't think that's bad. I think that's kinda funny. Not belly laugh funny but a little chuckle.

Still this movie didn't look good and ive been saying it's not wise to end a movie one such a cliffhanger
 
Damn. These past few pages have made me feel a little isolated for looking forward to the new Tarzan. :funny:
 
So I read that they sung modern songs in this movie? weird.
 
According to a few pages back:
[BLACKOUT]Peter Pan: Hook, we'll always be friends right?
Captain Hook: Sure kid, what could possibly go wrong?
[/BLACKOUT]

It's really weird that this movie and the recent Syfy re-imagining both used the Hook and Peter as allies "before the legend."

I guess Wendy is an important part of the story for the audience cause without her, Peter and Hook lose their characterization.
 
Warners To Write Off $130-150M On "Pan"?

By Garth Franklin Monday October 12th 2015 05:51PM
With a 24% rating on Rotten Tomatoes and a disastrous $15.3 million opening weekend launch in North America, the hope for Warners was that their big-budget Peter Pan origin story "Pan" might be able to mitigate its losses with a healthy international gross.
It's a fair enough hope, foreign grosses have saved panned blockbusters like "Battleship" and "Terminator Genisys" and well-regarded ones like "Pacific Rim" and "The Adventures Of Tintin" after all did only middling domestic business. However they aren't a guarantee, and foreign audiences seem disinterested in "Pan" which is struggling internationally and grossed just $20.4 million over the weekend from 54 markets.
As a result, THR reports that, according to analysts and box-office experts, the film could see losses in the $130 million to $150 million range. The studio however has not gone on the record about the film's performance, and a wild card left in the mix is China where the film opens October 22nd and could lower the potential losses.
The trade reports that the studio gambled big on the film in the hopes of launching a new family fantasy franchise to make up for the end of their "Harry Potter" series. It now joins several other high-profile money losers for the studio this year including "Jupiter Ascending" and "The Man from U.N.C.L.E.".
Despite the dark times, the studio's 2016 slate looks incredibly promising with " Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice," "Suicide Squad" and Harry Potter spinoff "Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them" all on the way.
 
Things didn't pan out for WB on this one.
 
http://www.vulture.com/2015/10/pan-lost-warner-brothers-so-much-money.html
tumblr_nw6ah4chKb1s1ghg9o1_1280.png
 
All those uses of "Pan" made me want to throw water at the author of that Vulture article
 
Every studio has their ups-and-downs. Fox had a dry spell for almost a year after Avatar (2010), and 2014 was a banner year for them. Universal had an awful 2009 outside of Fast & Furious and It's Complicated but 2015 has been the best in the company's history. It's cyclical.

Next year, WB should be back on top with Batman v. Superman, Suicide Squad and Fantastic Beasts.
 
Vulture is an awful website and that article wasn't funny. There have been way better articles written about Pan's disastrous box office. WB is having the kind of awful year that gets people fired. And I can't believe THR is saying that they spent 180mil on Tarzan! I don't see that film succeeding either.
 
Last edited:
Yeesh. 2015 has not been kind to WB.
 
I saw the trailer and i just felt the tone was off.

I love the Peter Pan legend, predominately from the Disney film, followed by Hook then the cartoon series - Peter Pan and the Pirates.

It doesn't really feel like anything new, even though it is an origins story.

I would have preferred it if it were set in Victorian London, an orphanage and the story of Peter, where he leads a mutiny and escape the home they are in. An adventure takes them to Never Land aided by Think.

I'm sure there are some great moments, but Hook a friend? It's been done before and it doesn't look like it was handled well.

Oh well, we can keep dreaming
 
This was every bit the bizarre trainwreck it looked like. And I enjoyed every minute of it. :funny:
 
This movie was meh.

I wasn't feeling a cowboy Captain Hook.

The Nirvana and Ramones music choices were weird.

The plot was derivative and bland. Peter Pan really didn't need another one of those boring chosen one narratives.

Jackman tries to make his Blackbeard quirky and intimidating but it doesn't really work.
Blackbeard would of been far more entertaining if they cast someone like Nicholas Cage and just let him be this larger than life bat**** crazy eccentric oddball.

I feel this film was too long as well. Could of easily lost 15 to 20 minutes of its running time.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"