Katsuro said:
lol, me too. I hate to admit it, but I voted for Mark Hammil. Don't know what I was thinking.
That's why I think there needs to be a new poll, with all the people that are still being talked about. (Hulme, Law, Weaving, Bettany, Brody, Jackman, Rockwell, hell even throw Glover on there.) I'm sure a poll starting today would turn out a heck of a lot different than that old one.
Hey, I would have voted for him too - he's got the laugh, the Batman experience and knowledge, and his face is already messed up! True, with his voice work it's not like he needs the money, but still - he could still be good. A little old, true, but if he was indeed cast, I would not be howling in rage.
Bettany - not funny, but certainly creepy enough for me. I liked him in "A Knight's Tale", he could pull it off.
Brody - poor little guy, he looks like a daschund. He's too vulnerable and puppy-eyed for my Joker tastes.
Law - he could do it, but would he? He's too suave, and too pretty. Pretty pretty pretty....Where was I? Oh yeah...
Jackman - nope. He's already got Wolverine, I don't think he has the creepy-scary chops to be Joker. We've really got to ration the geek roles, because Ian McKellan is already emersing himself in the fountain of Nerd Film Heros, all set to be baptised as our God. We are not worthy!
Weaving - yes. Yes yes yes. He could definitely do it! He showed off his campy side in V - but once again, he's also gone to the fountain of Nerd Heroes more than once - LOTR, V for Vendetta, the Matrix, etc.
Rockwell - he'd be an understated Joker, but he could do it. He usually plays loser-ish type people, though. I don't want a bumbling Joker.
Glover - While he could very well be perfect for the role (much like DeVito for Penguin, which made me think that when God created him, he thought "hey, just for laughs, let's make this guy look like the Penguin dude from the comics!"), I think casting him as a crazy-insane-villain would only be encouraging him.
Eccleston - awww...I've still got the warm fuzzies for him for when he was on BBC's "Cracker". Plus - nerd experience with Dr. Who, and visually he's a good match as well.
Roth - meh. Haven't seen him that often - he was an amusing dandy in "Rob Roy", but I don't think I've seen him in enough things to be a good judge. I've only seen him in "Pulp Fiction", "Rob Roy", and "Planet of the Apes" - and that last one, if working in makeup is any judge, was AWFUL.
Depp - no. NO. He's very pretty, yes, and he's been weird before in Charlie and the Chocolate factory, but still too pretty-boy for Joker.
Williams - funny as ALL HELL, and becoming increasingly experienced in playing psychopaths, but too old.
Black - YES - but--as hard as it is for me discriminate people against their body size, Black's adorable roundness might prove a disadvantage when playing the rapier-thin Joker. Jack Nicholson was a fine Joker, but many have complained about his size, and he wasn't all that chubby to begin with. Jack Black COULD, however, be a fine Penguin if Nolan were to use him again.
Gyllenhall - what? WHAT? WTF? When did that get in there? I say, don't let him get his hands on any lipstick and grease paint, and have him hold on to the Spidey tights - because he's got more chance of replacing Tobey when he breaks his spine in half than playing the Joker.
Carrell - YES. YES. He's my number one choice - I'm a fan, I'll admit it. Someone informed me that someone suggested him before, and got laughed off the boards, but I'll stick by my choice. He's very dynamic, he's got the crazy eyes (and the Joker nose!), and he's got versatile acting chops as well. Call me crazy, but Carrell for Joker!
Jason Lee: NO. For one reason: he'd have to shave the 'stache.