The Dark Knight Joker finally revealed! - MERGED

Rate the new look on the scale of 1-10, 10 being the best, 1 being the worst

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think Joker looks very frightening, which is good, although I never really liked the idea of facial scars forming a "carved" smile. That's all I can say until I see more.
 
actually Mark hamill has done deeep low guttaral laughs just as much as he's done high-pitched ones, Batman Beyond Return of the Joker is full of them and in Mask of the phantasm, there's one right after he plugs the attorney with his joker venom in the movie, hamill had it all, i'm just hoping Heath has the same

Hamill's take on the Joker was amazing! I'd love to see Heath pull off that almost split-persona dynamic Hamill gave to the Joker in BTAS. He's amusing when he's giddy and comical, but downright creepy when he was angered and his laugh got somewhat morbid sounding.
 
I just hope this whole "laugh issue" or Joker debate in general doesn't turn into something like Heath has GOT to top Hamill and/or Nicholson or he has GOT to sound like them/act like them and if he doesn't HE SUCKS, HE IS HORRIBLE, HE RUINED THE MOVIE. etc, etc. I mean, come on. Can't he be different than those two and still be good? Is that out of the realm of possibility? Because thats most likely how its going to be. He probably isn't going to draw a whole lot of similarities to either of them.
 
in todays sun (english newspaper) is a supposed picture of the joker

looks different to the one at the start of this thread

would a big newspaper like that put a fake in their paper?
 
in todays sun (english newspaper) is a supposed picture of the joker

looks different to the one at the start of this thread

would a big newspaper like that put a fake in their paper?
everythig is possible in 2007 :woot:
 
in todays sun (english newspaper) is a supposed picture of the joker

looks different to the one at the start of this thread

would a big newspaper like that put a fake in their paper?

you have a scan of that?
 
sorry, i don't have a scanner. but i think i have seen the pic before on this site.

its a black and white pic and he has really dark eyes and lips
 
sorry, i don't have a scanner. but i think i have seen the pic before on this site.

its a black and white pic and he has really dark eyes and lips

Uh...isn't that WHAT the picture is at the beginning of this thread? As in the first revealed pic of Joker. And you don't have a camera either?
 
Fake. What a bunch of morons! Yeah, that looks like Heath Ledger alright :whatever:
 
Well, that's fine Heath doesn't have to sound like Hamill or Nicholson at all (well I would like him to sound more like Hamill) but I would definetly appreciate him having his own dynamic of voice and laughter that Hamill had. He doens't have to sound the same, he can make it his own but the dynamic still has to be there because that's kinda who the joker is
 
i took a photo of the fake in the paper. sorry about quality, i only have a crappy webcam

 
:csad: Is the photo supposed to be the sneak peek or is there something else? I dunno why I'm asking, this is the Sun we're talking about
 
in todays sun (english newspaper) is a supposed picture of the joker

looks different to the one at the start of this thread

would a big newspaper like that put a fake in their paper?

The Sun posted the Conrad Veidt manip earlier in the year, claiming it was the real deal.

Honestly, don't believe everything in the Sun. It's a trashy tabloid.

EDIT: Aha! It is the Conrad Veidt manip. God. Shoot me now.
 
yeah any paper or tv news network owned by Murdoch is tripe.
now he owns the Wall St Journal.(and 2 more NY papers) I'm sure it will be more like the national enquirer before long.
 
i took a photo of the fake in the paper. sorry about quality, i only have a crappy webcam


good enough.

man, i cant believe they actually published a manip. so much for checking their sources.
 
at least they picked probably the best manip out there, the veidt manip had me going for a while too
 
he meant the best manip of Joker DB

and it is. Ledger or not.
 
good enough.

man, i cant believe they actually published a manip. so much for checking their sources.


At least they picked the REAL Joker.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • TMWL.jpg
    TMWL.jpg
    105.6 KB · Views: 403
I just hope this whole "laugh issue" or Joker debate in general doesn't turn into something like Heath has GOT to top Hamill and/or Nicholson or he has GOT to sound like them/act like them and if he doesn't HE SUCKS, HE IS HORRIBLE, HE RUINED THE MOVIE. etc, etc. I mean, come on. Can't he be different than those two and still be good? Is that out of the realm of possibility? Because thats most likely how its going to be. He probably isn't going to draw a whole lot of similarities to either of them.

im not really haveing a problem with ledger......ok, kinda, but i have more of a problem with nolans realistic "vision" for everything. the problem with that is that it's too realistic. Unlike Burton's Gotham City, I can't imagine a guy nick named The Joker running around or a woman who dresses up like a cat in BB's Gotham City. In any Gotham City (regardless of director), I think there has to be a certain over the top-ness, which I think BB lacked. thats more the reason why im worried about how the joker will be interpreted, cuz just like in BB, they might try to downplay the villians, including Joker. and thats why im nervous that they may destroy what makes the joker so damn awsome.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,294
Messages
22,081,683
Members
45,881
Latest member
lucindaschatz
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"