Joss Whedon developing Marvel SHIELD series for ABC

Status
Not open for further replies.
I dunno... I feel that the show shouldn't bee too heavily focused on superheroes. Remember, this is SHIELD the TV series, and not Avengers the TV series. Meaning, guest starring superheroes should not happen regularly and/or overshadow the main characters.


One interesting question is how morally grey should the protagonists be? One of the things that kept coming up on The Avengers was how Fury was as bad as Loki in ruthlessness and past sins, and how SHIELD is actually a pretty shady organisation. Think about it... their top operatives were former assassins (i.e. murderers-for-hire), were willing to develop new weapons of mass destruction, and already have a number in their arsenal (in the movie, the Helicarrier had at least two whole nukes; and the way it was shown left me with the impression that those two weren't anywhere close to their entire nuclear stockpile).

Given their perceived escalating arms race between themselves and metahumans (mainly off-worlders), it would make sense that they would want to develop superpowered beings of their own that they know will operate on SHIELD's terms. In this regard, I think it would be quite fitting to have an episode or overarching subplot where the characters do things like try to steal the Iron Man tech from Stark, etc.
 
Get Mark Valley as Clay Quartermain and I'll be interested.:exp:

(Yes,I'm still smarting over the loss of Human Target.:waa:)
 
I dunno... I feel that the show shouldn't bee too heavily focused on superheroes. Remember, this is SHIELD the TV series, and not Avengers the TV series. Meaning, guest starring superheroes should not happen regularly and/or overshadow the main characters.


One interesting question is how morally grey should the protagonists be? One of the things that kept coming up on The Avengers was how Fury was as bad as Loki in ruthlessness and past sins, and how SHIELD is actually a pretty shady organisation. Think about it... their top operatives were former assassins (i.e. murderers-for-hire), were willing to develop new weapons of mass destruction, and already have a number in their arsenal (in the movie, the Helicarrier had at least two whole nukes; and the way it was shown left me with the impression that those two weren't anywhere close to their entire nuclear stockpile).

Given their perceived escalating arms race between themselves and metahumans (mainly off-worlders), it would make sense that they would want to develop superpowered beings of their own that they know will operate on SHIELD's terms. In this regard, I think it would be quite fitting to have an episode or overarching subplot where the characters do things like try to steal the Iron Man tech from Stark, etc.

In case you weren't aware: you just contradicted your first paragraph with your last paragraph.

SHIELD will be about superheroes and supervillains. For the reason you just stated --- that SHIELD (and the Council, and the world in general) will be trying to monitor, recruit and control as many metas as possible to defend Earth from future crises.

And for the more obvious reason that this is a Marvel Comics TV show. So people young and old are naturally going to tune in hoping to see superheroes and supervillains, since that's Marvel's only product and all. Nobody wants to tune in to see another cop show that's kinda-sorta attached to a super-powered world which is never shown.
 
Eh, SHIELD is grey, but the idea that its as bad as Loki is Loki being manipulative. SHIELD can be *ruthless*, yes, but it generally seems to be composed of people who avoid being stupidly ruthless. The protagonists of the show should be pretty clearly good guys, with internal moral conflicts between SHIELD personnel an *occasional* issue, not a constant one. Even the WSC isn't all wrong, they just tend towards the easiest answer.
 
In case you weren't aware: you just contradicted your first paragraph with your last paragraph.

SHIELD will be about superheroes and supervillains. For the reason you just stated --- that SHIELD (and the Council, and the world in general) will be trying to monitor, recruit and control as many metas as possible to defend Earth from future crises.

And for the more obvious reason that this is a Marvel Comics TV show. So people young and old are naturally going to tune in hoping to see superheroes and supervillains, since that's Marvel's only product and all. Nobody wants to tune in to see another cop show that's kinda-sorta attached to a super-powered world which is never shown.

I didn't say that the show should never feature heroes whatsoever but that its central premise should be about SHIELD more so than the Avengers. In other words, it should be about SHIELD being SHIELD as opposed to being about them recruiting and evaluating potentials for the Avengers (which has been shown to be something of a personal project of Fury's).

Moreover, in the idea I put forward, it's not about getting costumed heroes at all but about SHIELD getting operatives with special abilities to (in their minds) help level the playing field. It would be just one of several different strategies they are looking into (e.g. the weapons being developed for Stage 2 as seen in the Avengers movie).
 
I agree I definitely am not against cameos or even recurring characters (stuff like Carol Danvers showing up) and such but I definitely want the focus to be on SHIELD and not the superhero of the week guest star.
 
You know I might be the only one but I actually would like this show to be based off Item 47. The main cast would be the characters from Item 47 with the addition of Maria Hill and maybe Agent Carter (hopefully played by Amanda Righetti).

The plot would be about the lower ranking Shield agents investigating and capturing low level superpowered bad guys that rob banks, murder and whatnot. Their HQ should be that building that Steve Rodgers came out of in NY, while the Helicarrier (a separate department of SHIELD, hence the different logos) is used by Fury for catching bigger fish. I assume that in the MCU that the FBI, Homeland Security and possibly CIA don't exist or perhaps combined to form Shield. So basically i look at this show as a FBI type series but with Marvel characters.

I would like to see them catching crappy bad guys like The Walrus, Ruby Thursday, Wrecking Crew, etc, every week. Characters that would never in a million years show up in a movie but at the same time there should be a seasonal story arc that leads to the plot of the movies. Like for example, Shield learning more and more about A.I.M. which will then lead to Iron Man 3.

In order for the show to work I think it should serve to fill in the gaps for each movie but also having their own voice. Also, all the big guys like Avengers and Fury should only make appearances via tv news or surveillance footage.
 
I didn't say that the show should never feature heroes whatsoever but that its central premise should be about SHIELD more so than the Avengers. In other words, it should be about SHIELD being SHIELD as opposed to being about them recruiting and evaluating potentials for the Avengers (which has been shown to be something of a personal project of Fury's).

Moreover, in the idea I put forward, it's not about getting costumed heroes at all but about SHIELD getting operatives with special abilities to (in their minds) help level the playing field. It would be just one of several different strategies they are looking into (e.g. the weapons being developed for Stage 2 as seen in the Avengers movie).

What's the difference between the two, other than costumes? :huh:
Superheroes are superheroes. Doesn't matter if they wear funny costumes or street clothes. You and I both seem to want it to be about recruiting "lower level" heroes.
 
I disagree with everyone and I mean everyone here I do not want this series to be part of the Marvel movie Universe I want Marvel to invent a new universe for TV series

And I want this for many reasons, but one of them I want the real Nick Fury


And when I say real Nick Fury I do not mean only him being white There are two thing Nick Fury need so I can accept him as the real Nick Fury

1- Leadership of the "Howling Commandos" at World War II

2- Haveing the Infinity Formula in his blood

Without these two thing I do not care if his white or black or Asian he is not Nick Fury
 
The former I gan dig, but the later really isn't that important to his character I don't think. And I can even live without the former. It doesn't matter what his military background is as long as he had one. What's important to the character is how he behaves and what he does as director of SHIELD.
 
I disagree with everyone and I mean everyone here I do not want this series to be part of the Marvel movie Universe I want Marvel to invent a new universe for TV series

And I want this for many reasons, but one of them I want the real Nick Fury


And when I say real Nick Fury I do not mean only him being white There are two thing Nick Fury need so I can accept him as the real Nick Fury

1- Leadership of the "Howling Commandos" at World War II

2- Haveing the Infinity Formula in his blood

Without these two thing I do not care if his white or black or Asian he is not Nick Fury

I get where you're coming from, but by now the MCU has become so popular and prevalent, I think that ship has sailed already. :(
 
I disagree with everyone and I mean everyone here I do not want this series to be part of the Marvel movie Universe I want Marvel to invent a new universe for TV series

And I want this for many reasons, but one of them I want the real Nick Fury


And when I say real Nick Fury I do not mean only him being white There are two thing Nick Fury need so I can accept him as the real Nick Fury

1- Leadership of the "Howling Commandos" at World War II

2- Haveing the Infinity Formula in his blood

Without these two thing I do not care if his white or black or Asian he is not Nick Fury

Nick_Fury_Agent_of_Shield_film.jpg
 
I get where you're coming from, but by now the MCU has become so popular and prevalent, I think that ship has sailed already. :(

I just hate hate the Ultimate universe Before reading The Ultimates I never thought any one can write Hank pym character in a worst way than what was happening in Earth-616 , but I discovered I was wrong Mark Millar can :wow:
 
It's fine storytelling if you're talking about a franchise made up of a lot of different stories.

In the context of the movie The Avengers, it would have been completely pointless to make mention of any of that stuff because it had no bearing on that particular story.

Doesn't mean you can't, in another story set in the same world, say "oh, here's a person you haven't met yet."

I dunno, I feel like characters that could have potentially helped out definitely do have a bearing on the story, that's background information that could have changed the story potentially. That's why its a bad idea to later say they existed. With one or two, it's passable. With three or four, it begins to seem a bit incredulous. With a whole Marvel Universe, it would be stupid character-wise for no one to have said "Where's the..." Fantastic Four or Heroes for Hire, or Spider-Man or X-Men or other X-Men or Defenders, even though story-wise it would have been necessary for them not to say that. I guess I'm repeating myself now, so we can just agree to disagree here.

I think any pre-existing heroes will be like your Golden Age example, people who in no way could be even vaguely considered active circa Avengers.

Get Mark Valley as Clay Quartermain and I'll be interested.

That would be pretty frikkin awesome. That was an awesome show.

I agree I definitely am not against cameos or even recurring characters (stuff like Carol Danvers showing up) and such but I definitely want the focus to be on SHIELD and not the superhero of the week guest star.

That's a pretty good example of SHIELD operatives that are/become superheroes themselves. Personally, I'd like to see a few characters like that, and a few non-powered awesome ppl with equal footing/story/rank/etc.

You know I might be the only one but I actually would like this show to be based off Item 47. The main cast would be the characters from Item 47 with the addition of Maria Hill and maybe Agent Carter (hopefully played by Amanda Righetti).

The plot would be about the lower ranking Shield agents investigating and capturing low level superpowered bad guys that rob banks, murder and whatnot. Their HQ should be that building that Steve Rodgers came out of in NY, while the Helicarrier (a separate department of SHIELD, hence the different logos) is used by Fury for catching bigger fish. I assume that in the MCU that the FBI, Homeland Security and possibly CIA don't exist or perhaps combined to form Shield. So basically i look at this show as a FBI type series but with Marvel characters.

I would like to see them catching crappy bad guys like The Walrus, Ruby Thursday, Wrecking Crew, etc, every week. Characters that would never in a million years show up in a movie but at the same time there should be a seasonal story arc that leads to the plot of the movies. Like for example, Shield learning more and more about A.I.M. which will then lead to Iron Man 3.

In order for the show to work I think it should serve to fill in the gaps for each movie but also having their own voice. Also, all the big guys like Avengers and Fury should only make appearances via tv news or surveillance footage.

I feel on the overall low-level-bad-guy hunting, but Fury is their boss, he should show up as often as possible. And as much as I wouldn't watch a espionage show with the tone of Item 47, the idea that Chitauri technology has fallen into the wrong hands seems like a great starting point. The misuse of the Phase II stuff couldn't make things much better.

I dunno... I feel that the show shouldn't bee too heavily focused on superheroes. Remember, this is SHIELD the TV series, and not Avengers the TV series. Meaning, guest starring superheroes should not happen regularly and/or overshadow the main characters.


One interesting question is how morally grey should the protagonists be? One of the things that kept coming up on The Avengers was how Fury was as bad as Loki in ruthlessness and past sins, and how SHIELD is actually a pretty shady organisation. Think about it... their top operatives were former assassins (i.e. murderers-for-hire), were willing to develop new weapons of mass destruction, and already have a number in their arsenal (in the movie, the Helicarrier had at least two whole nukes; and the way it was shown left me with the impression that those two weren't anywhere close to their entire nuclear stockpile).

Given their perceived escalating arms race between themselves and metahumans (mainly off-worlders), it would make sense that they would want to develop superpowered beings of their own that they know will operate on SHIELD's terms. In this regard, I think it would be quite fitting to have an episode or overarching subplot where the characters do things like try to steal the Iron Man tech from Stark, etc.

SHIELD is an intelligence organization, with the secrets necessary to run such a thing, I think there are stories to tell there, but at no point should SHIELD be 'the bad guys.' Even if the main character is caught in an 'enemy of the state' situation, SHIELD is on the side of the angels... just really close to the line because that works best for them.

On the superhero thing, I think part of making it a SHIELD show and not a West Coast (Great lakes?) Avengers show is only having one or two people with powers as main characters. It is cool that a team of 'normal' people can take down some of these super powered people, and reclaim some of these powerful devices. This is also necessary for TV. You really can only afford 5 or so visual special effects shots per episode (other than blur/travel powers). You need one in the beginning usually to illustrate the threat, and one mid way to show the threat escalating. That leaves you only about three for the climax. You don't want to have to split that between three or more characters because then some of them can't use their powers that episode, and you have to come up with shenanigans. Better to have, say, Quake or Brand to introduce the idea of a powered agent and add in Carol later. Everyone else is just bullets.
 
Last edited:
I dunno, I feel like characters that could have potentially helped out definitely do have a bearing on the story, that's background information that could have changed the story potentially. That's why its a bad idea to later say they existed. With one or two, it's passable. With three or four, it begins to seem a bit incredulous. With a whole Marvel Universe, it would be stupid character-wise for no one to have said "Where's the..." Fantastic Four or Heroes for Hire, or Spider-Man or X-Men or other X-Men or Defenders, even though story-wise it would have been necessary for them not to say that. I guess I'm repeating myself now, so we can just agree to disagree here.

Really, I just look at it on a movie by movie basis. It would have bogged down the movie at the time. If you bring them up later just have the explanation then. I think it's possible to over think this stuff. I've seen writers go out of their way to explain away all potential plot holes and it just drags the movie down with unnecessary exposition. If it's not something the audience would question at the time then it probably shouldn't be in there.

I think any pre-existing heroes will be like your Golden Age example, people who in no way could be even vaguely considered active circa Avengers.

I mostly agree. Marvel's going to want to do a lot of origins anyway.
 
this is my dream Episode This is what I want to happen a Old criminal escapes from prison and there is only one man one agent that can catch him and that former Shield agent Played by Kiefer Sutherland
 
Just cause its shield I don't see why heroes won't be a factor. Would you really just want the show to just be shield coverrt ops team fighting no named terrorists every episode. That would get boring real fast. Where you can do those types of episodes here and there. While tossing in stories about resurgance of hyrda, aim and other marvel baddies. Along with other key villains. Who fight shield in there.

Guest herroes could be that just the occasional special one off episodes sprinkled through each season like only do maybe two or 3 episodes out of say 22 about a guest hero.

The show doesn't have to be just about shield tracking heroes. Hell we don't even know yet what the theme of the show will be besides its featuring shield/shield agents. So let's wait to we get more details on the show before we throw a fit about it. So much is unknown still.
 
this is my dream Episode This is what I want to happen a Old criminal escapes from prison and there is only one man one agent that can catch him and that former Shield agent Played by Kiefer Sutherland

"Chloe, get me the schematics to the chemical weapons facility!"

"I just told you, my name is Abigail."

"Not now, Chloe! There's no time!"

"Sigh."
 
"Chloe, get me the schematics to the chemical weapons facility!"

"I just told you, my name is Abigail."

"Not now, Chloe! There's no time!"

"Sigh."

dam iI miss 24 Speaking of 24 Is there a Shield agent Carlos Bernard will be a good cast for :woot:
 
Just cause its shield I don't see why heroes won't be a factor. Would you really just want the show to just be shield coverrt ops team fighting no named terrorists every episode. That would get boring real fast. Where you can do those types of episodes here and there. While tossing in stories about resurgance of hyrda, aim and other marvel baddies. Along with other key villains. Who fight shield in there.

Guest herroes could be that just the occasional special one off episodes sprinkled through each season like only do maybe two or 3 episodes out of say 22 about a guest hero.

The show doesn't have to be just about shield tracking heroes. Hell we don't even know yet what the theme of the show will be besides its featuring shield/shield agents. So let's wait to we get more details on the show before we throw a fit about it. So much is unknown still.
yes, i forgot to mention that. New heroes should also be a factor as well. Like the way they do on the show Alphas. But these heroes should be B-List or C-List characters that won't ever get their own movies.

Also, I think it'll be cool if they figure out and build a SuperMax Vault prison and/or the Triskelion throughout the series. With a tv show theres endless possibilities.
 
ya if we get any heroes I leave it to knows we know won't see a movie any time soon like moonknight for one. Punisher I can't really see it going to movies again after it failed three times. And would be better suited for tv. To maybe iron fist/luke cage type of heroes(if they don't end up getting a film during phase 2/3 for). Some low class guys wouldn't be to bad. Speaking if we where to see a c/d list guy/gal what other heroes of that calbier would you guys want to see.
 
What's the difference between the two, other than costumes? :huh:
Superheroes are superheroes. Doesn't matter if they wear funny costumes or street clothes. You and I both seem to want it to be about recruiting "lower level" heroes.

I do not want them 'recruiting lower level heroes' at all. SHIELD would only want the best of the best - hence my idea in the first place. To settle for second rate metahumans would make no sense on SHIELD's part.


There are plenty of differences between superheroes and super-powered operatives. Superheroes are unique individuals with specific back stories and special talents, who operate largely independently and tend to tackle crime. What I'm talking about are nameless G-men with mass produced enhancements who answer to and operate under a strict chain of command and who do not routinely tackle crime; instead kept on reserve in the event of a war or some other catastrophe. In other words, a squadron of Iron Men or an army of Super Soldiers at SHIELD's disposal.

Which is not to say I want such individuals to appear in the show. But rather, feature SHIELD's efforts to acquire said technology - both, covertly from the heroes and confiscating those used by villains. After all, SHIELD are a bunch of spies and half of spywork is in spying on one's own allies.
 
What I'm talking about are nameless G-men with mass produced enhancements who answer to and operate under a strict chain of command and who do not routinely tackle crime; instead kept on reserve in the event of a war or some other catastrophe. In other words, a squadron of Iron Men or an army of Super Soldiers at SHIELD's disposal.

Which is not to say I want such individuals to appear in the show. But rather, feature SHIELD's efforts to acquire said technology - both, covertly from the heroes and confiscating those used by villains. After all, SHIELD are a bunch of spies and half of spywork is in spying on one's own allies.

That'd be a cool as FRACK storyline. Ultimates did a little of this, but it went of with out a hitch, there should be some backfire on that, like with the Phase II stuff. They should definitely have the unstable Super Soldier Serum from TIH in their back pocket, and some USAgents at the ready in case of foolishness. Obviously, at least one has to be accidentally released and go out of control. That adds another story type to the team, not just lost Chitauri tech, or Asgardian baubles that were left behind, or even rogue scientists, but SHIELD tech that's escaped/abused/misused. Very cool. Very cool. Glad you explained what you were getting at.

Really, I just look at it on a movie by movie basis. It would have bogged down the movie at the time. If you bring them up later just have the explanation then. I think it's possible to over think this stuff. I've seen writers go out of their way to explain away all potential plot holes and it just drags the movie down with unnecessary exposition. If it's not something the audience would question at the time then it probably shouldn't be in there.

I agree, that's why I suggest keeping the plot hole small, with one or two such people, and not feeling free to open the plot hole larger and larger with more individuals and just 'explain it later.' Because I've also seen removal of story elements because their explanations don't fit on screen save films/stories/adaptations.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"