Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]499501[/split]
"Jurassic World accomplishes the task of being something of an original adventure within the confines of being a sequel."
That's all I ask.
Is that what IGN said?
Jurassic World is a monster of a good time that returns the franchise to greatness, delivering great scares and non-stop action sure to please fans and newcomers. This is, at long last, the Jurassic sequel we’ve been waiting for.
IGN is pretty hated, they like basically everything they throw at them. Every GOT episode is a 9 minimum and almost every major AAA has a 80 score at least, so its said that they get a lot of money from companies to hype up products
For what it's worth, Forbes were won over.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markhug...jurassic-world-roars-new-life-into-franchise/
I'm seeing the movie on Saturday, anyway. My own opinion will be the one that matters.
No. It was an RT review snippet.
anyone who thought this was going to get 80% on RT is insane. even if it's our dream sequel to JP it still wont break 75%
For what it's worth, Forbes were won over.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markhug...jurassic-world-roars-new-life-into-franchise/
I'm seeing the movie on Saturday, anyway. My own opinion will be the one that matters.
I do think this will prove popular at the box office.
"The CGI blends beautifully with the live sets and people, and is by far the finest of any giant monster/dinosaur depiction on film to date."
From Forbes article. But haters gonna hate anyway.
Even if this movie is terrible, it can't be as bad as JP3.
Could it?
Even if this movie is terrible, it can't be as bad as JP3.
Could it?
Better to be as bad as JP3 than be as bad as The Lost World.
Faraci's review is really funny.