Jurassic World - Part 9

[GR8GODZILLAGOD]

I take it you like 3 better then Lost world? I think Lost world is much better then 3 and the more I watch Lost world the more it grows on me.

3 was meh. Really didn't like Lost World. I hated almost every character in that film and they made the dumbest of decisions. That makes it really hard to find enjoyment.

 

[spiderman2]

3 was meh. Really didn't like Lost World. I hated almost every character in that film and they made the dumbest of decisions. That makes it really hard to find enjoyment.

So you really only like JP1 then? While Lost world at least had Malcum back and a lot of cool moments like don't run into the grass and 2 T-Rex ect. Also the soundtrack. JP3 the parents drove me nuts and the movie was to short, felt like the movie was just made for money at that time.

 

[Jaspertian1105]

3 had doctor Grant at least, but the story was all over the place. Both of the sequels have so many plot holes that it really breaks those movies for me. I think 2 is a little less goofy , but it has those face palm moments as well so its hard to pick.

I will go with 2 cause the T rex looks amazing in that one, really stunning work

 

[DA_Champion]

Why what dose it say? If it said something about spoilers I don't want to know though trying to stay away from spoilers like I do for ever movie I am going to see.

Faraci trashed the film from to bottom.

Wooden and nonsensical characters, plot points are randomly added and dropped, arcs go from point a to point c and skip point b, the smart dinisaur makes no sense, theme park looks boring, action is boring.

 

[spiderman2]

Faraci trashed the film from to bottom.

Wooden and nonsensical characters, plot points are randomly added and dropped, arcs go from point a to point c and skip point b, the smart dinisaur makes no sense, theme park looks boring, action is boring.

Oh while sounds like they really hated the movie but I wouldn't really say that sounds funny though.

 

[divan]

Faraci's review is the epitome of the "didn't like it, therefore it must be awful" way of thinking, though. There's hardly anything worth in that "review" (and I would say "angry rant" suits that way of writing much better).

 

[ares834]

Faraci is a hack. I can't believe people still give him attention and read his reviews.

 

[Mysteryman]

Faraci's review is really funny.

did he like it?

 

[Schlosser85]

I write far better reviews than Faraci.

 

[spiderman2]

So how many reviews before we tend to get a consensus?

 

[spiderman2]

Faraci is a hack. I can't believe people still give him attention and read his reviews.

What has he said about other movies good or bad? Like what did he say about say a movie like Dark knight or a movie like asm2?

 

[Mysteryman]

I write far better reviews than Faraci.

I am looking forward to your review.

 

[Schlosser85]

I am looking forward to your review.

I'm seeing it at 9:30 pm on the 11th. Will hope to post a review before I go to bed.

 

[Spitfire]

Faraci is a hack. I can't believe people still give him attention and read his reviews.

Empire have given JW four stars and it's rating on Rotten Tomatoes is currently 6.9/10 which is higher than AoU (6.7/10).

 

[BigA]

I'm guessing it will get give or take 60% on RT, which is not all that bad. I'm seeing it regardless, but I'm surprised they put on the embargo at all.

 

[Octoberist]

You shouldn't compare the AoU reviews when the meter for JW is still ongoing

 

[spiderman2]

So far it is at a 64 over all RT score but the top critic score is 71%. I wonder if the top critic score will stay above the over all score or not?

 

[spiderman2]

You shouldn't compare the AoU reviews when the meter for JW is still ongoing

Yeah but people always like to find things to compared things to lol.

 

[Jaspertian1105]

It cant be worse than the other 2, its not physically possible. Not that i hate them, i like parts of both but this one even though there are weird stuff, i don't care. The concept of cloning dinosaurs from blood in amber was impossible since the 1st movie, so if there is some weird science there, its nothing that's uncommon from the franchise.

If its entertaining at the end of the day its all that matters to me

 

[Schlosser85]

On his Twitter, Berardinelli just said "breathe easy, Jurassic Park fans....review tomorrow".

That sounds positive?

 

[spiderman2]

I'm guessing it will get give or take 60% on RT, which is not all that bad. I'm seeing it regardless, but I'm surprised they put on the embargo at all.

I don't know why but I thought lost world got a 59 but I looked this morning and it got a 52. So if this movie got a 60 it would be 8 higher then Lost world and the first JP movie out side of JP1 to get 60 or higher but I hope it can get to around 70.

 

[spiderman2]

On his Twitter, Berardinelli just said "breathe easy, Jurassic Park fans....review tomorrow".

That sounds positive?

I would think with say Breath easy that sounds like a way of saying you don't have to panic the movie is good.

 

[spiderman2]

It cant be worse than the other 2, its not physically possible. Not that i hate them, i like parts of both but this one even though there are weird stuff, i don't care. The concept of cloning dinosaurs from blood in amber was impossible since the 1st movie, so if there is some weird science there, its nothing that's uncommon from the franchise.

If its entertaining at the end of the day its all that matters to me

While JP3 and 2 where a lot better then star wars 1 and 2 lol. So it could be worse.

 

[ShadowBoxer]

I am kinda shocked the review score started out in the 60's. Usually with movies like this, the review score starts out high like in the 80s-90's then drops. I seeing this Friday night (in 3D sadly) and I pretty sure I will like it from what I heard.

 

[Anjow1060]

Anyone know if there's anything after the credits? or a mid-credits scene?

-Jow