Sequels Kevin Feige (Marvel) says our box office $ will be rewarded w/more Spidey Sequels!

[PalmerTheThing]

Well even if there still awful. Its still spiderman.

 

[Fran]

Well, Batman and Robin was still BATMAN, but it was awful.

 

[Visionary]

Well, Batman and Robin was still BATMAN, but it was awful.

...Probably because the script, casting and director's vision was awful. Do you people not realize this?

 

[Advanced Dark]

Some of you guys are crazy? You act as if more than 3 films is too many to derrive from 50 years of history and hundreds of stories. Give me a break. Sony hasn't let us down yet. They hired the right people, spent the necessary money, and will continue to do so...

Until proven otherwise there's no need to doubt them. Raimi isn't a God and he's not the only one who can direct this franchise, and Tobey honestly is getting too old.

 

[Cinemaman]

^^^

Believe me, everything repeats itself.

If Raimi leaves this franchise, then SOny will as another guy to direct other Spidey movies and he will just turn them into crap.

Fans thought Scumacher would be good director for Batman, he wasn't.

Fans thought Ratner would be good director for X3, he wasn't.

And now the same can happen with Spidey.

 

[PalmerTheThing]

Why is there a green daisy underneath your name?

 

[Mephistopheles]

^^^

Believe me, everything repeats itself.

If Raimi leaves this franchise, then SOny will as another guy to direct other Spidey movies and he will just turn them into crap.

Fans thought Scumacher would be good director for Batman, he wasn't.

Fans thought Ratner would be good director for X3, he wasn't.

And now the same can happen with Spidey.

The hell they did. Most of the fans that I came across felt very pessimistic about him directing X3.

 

[PalmerTheThing]

Brian should of returned for X3 but he would have rathered did SMR

 

[Visionary]

^^^

Believe me, everything repeats itself.

If Raimi leaves this franchise, then SOny will as another guy to direct other Spidey movies and he will just turn them into crap.

You mean like Bryan Singer turned Superman into crap, I doubt that's going to happen?

Fans thought Scumacher would be good director for Batman, he wasn't.

Fans didn't think anything about ShoeSmackAss, until they saw the film. Like I said, it was Warner Bros./Director's vision, the horrible script and casting that caused that film to suck.

Fans thought Ratner would be good director for X3, he wasn't.

And yet more people went to see X3 multiple times, than they did Superman Returns, X1 and X2, what does it say about these films? You people must love going to see movies you claim to hate.

And now the same can happen with Spidey.

You have a crystal ball I see, use it to decide on your next LOTTO numbers.

 

[djb]

What the ****! Hey Dog Lips I posted this **** four days ago and you ****ers moved it to the "Spiderman Sequels" Forum where it died. What the **** is the deal! This ass wipe posts it here and it stays,expalin this to me!

http://www.superherohype.com/forums/showthread.php?t=247358

 

[PalmerTheThing]

Holy moly. You gettin BANNED.

 

[Advanced Dark]

I hope so GhostRider,

Look at the rest of his posts. He's a troll on a mission.

http://www.superherohype.com/forums/search.php?searchid=1749981

 

[DOG LIPS]

What the ****! Hey Dog Lips I posted this **** four days ago and you ****ers moved it to the "Spiderman Sequels" Forum where it died. What the **** is the deal! This ass wipe posts it here and it stays,expalin this to me!

http://www.superherohype.com/forums/showthread.php?t=247358

Yes, this does need to be in sequels. Did you have to make such a moronic post about it?

 

[PalmerTheThing]

He's the troll under the bridge.

 

[Danalys]

^^^

Believe me, everything repeats itself.

If Raimi leaves this franchise, then SOny will as another guy to direct other Spidey movies and he will just turn them into crap.

Fans thought Scumacher would be good director for Batman, he wasn't.

Fans thought Ratner would be good director for X3, he wasn't.

And now the same can happen with Spidey.

batman and film fans who were smart at the time wanted burton to do a third film. you can find the script for the film he might have made online. but the execs at warner brothers were consernd with parents who's children were freaked out by batman returns, or at least they thought they should be. they couldn't handle it. so they brought in someone to make a less dark, less bizzare and less slightly grotesque version. batman forever is what you got. the success of batman forever lead to them going even further in the camp, neon eyesaw direction. boring and unentertaining was the result.

ratner did very well considering the time constraints. they had a whole bunch of characters with little development. but it was a war movie to some extent. that requires unnamed soldiers to die. then there's deaths of main characters. really they had pluses and minuses. but in the world of the x-men dead might not mean dead. or they can go the parrelel universe route and tell a different story with characters that died in the other universe. you just go back to an earlier point in time and start again with new stories. all that matters is that people want more x-men and if box-office is anything to go by, they do. imagine if the next x-men trilogy was all told in the Age of Apocalypse. it would push the boundaries of both comic films, and movie series in general.

 

[PalmerTheThing]

Spiderman 3 is going to rock END OF STORY.

 

[PalmerTheThing]

Same here.

 

[djb]

Hey Ghostrider, since you eat breathe, I got something else you can eat, care to guess what it is?

 

[CrashNburn]

Nice!

 

[C. Lee]

Hey Ghostrider, since you eat breathe, I got something else you can eat, care to guess what it is?

Goodbye.

 

[djb_80]

Goodbye, I think not.

 

[DACrowe]

Look I think there are great stories to tell (the Lizard at the top of the list) and some aspects that we missed that could've been great (Death of Gwen Stacy, Black Cat, etc.) however I find that trying to make more movies for the sake of money....mightn ot end well.

I know that this a money driven franchise and it is all about the bottom line but they got talent that took their time in crafting something special most importantly being Sam Raimi and Tobey Maguire. They're going to do no more than 4 (most likely 3) which is unfortunate. Why continue from there then? Because it makes money. And yes while the source material IS VERY RICH, it will be hard to find new great talent. I hate to say it but the Harry Potter movies are flukes. For some reason Potter is more respected than all comic book characters and can draw that kind of talent like the makers of Y Tu Mama Bien. While we can have up and coming talent or indie talent that has not been tapped yet (a la Sam Raimi) it is unlikely in the need to push these out to make the bottom line that studios will go that way.

Brett Ratner was chosen and made a ****ty film. Sony respects its franchise more than Fox but at the same time you have to understand that they will make these movies for money and are less cautious about who they hire as the source material is not so finely defined as say Harry Potter. And the last thing we need is this to become the Bond franchise, looking back you can see over half of the Bond movies were crap. While there is some gems in them, overall the franchise has become in many ways a self-parody which is why Sony/MGM is having such a tough time trying to sell this gritty reboot with CR.

I know the material is there to make a long and great franchise but I know as the numbers of sequels continue to add up that they will undoubtedly start going with lesser talent who don't mind stepping on someone else's creation to churn these things out as quickly as possible.

 

[Advanced Dark]

Goodbye, I think not.

Goodbye again. So you have multiple ID's to troll with. It's good to see you have something worthwhile to do in life. Also this to me does NOT belong in the Spiderman sequels thread but it should be in the Spiderman 3 thread. Why? Because Feige is saying if we support Spiderman 3 with our box office dollars we'll get more sequels. That's the point.

 

[DOG LIPS]

Goodbye again. So you have multiple ID's to troll with. It's good to see you have something worthwhile to do in life. Also this to me does NOT belong in the Spiderman sequels thread but it should be in the Spiderman 3 thread. Why? Because Feige is saying if we support Spiderman 3 with our box office dollars we'll get more sequels. That's the point.

"There will be many more Spider-Man films to come," he revealed. "We already have stacks of ideas for the next one because of the wealth of stories in the comics. We could be making Spider-Man movies for the next 20 years, based on the 50 years of Spider-Man history we have."

He says there WILL be sequels, which is what it's about. I think he meant box office money as in the series is doing so well, not "Get out there and see part 3 50 times and you'll get more Spidey! If not, TOO BAD!" he's saying there WILL be sequels. Hence, sequels forum.

 

[Danalys]

And the last thing we need is this to become the Bond franchise, looking back you can see over half of the Bond movies were crap. While there is some gems in them, overall the franchise has become in many ways a self-parody which is why Sony/MGM is having such a tough time trying to sell this gritty reboot with CR.

i only talk about bond in regards to the ability for an audiance to accept new actors playing parts in an on going series of films.