DieSmiling
Can't Be Stopped
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2007
- Messages
- 2,657
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 33
I only own a pirated copy of the first one -- didn't care much for vol. 2, but I'll probably pick this up.
yea that's right gang, let's go and steal property that was made to entertain and used for biz but we can pirate it! that's right we show respect to the people who made these songs/shows/movies by taking them and sharing them blindly cuz hell, they make enough money and it's got 0 to do with me.
besides, in our everyday lives our jobs are so secure that it doesn't matter!
we can can destroy a biz model that supports hundreds of thousands of families and hey, no sweat, cuz the tool who posted and i quoted will sort it out cuz his buddy took another man's work and used it to his delight!
wicked.
yea that's right gang, let's go and steal property that was made to entertain and used for biz but we can pirate it! that's right we show respect to the people who made these songs/shows/movies by taking them and sharing them blindly cuz hell, they make enough money and it's got 0 to do with me.
besides, in our everyday lives our jobs are so secure that it doesn't matter!
we can can destroy a biz model that supports hundreds of thousands of families and hey, no sweat, cuz the tool who posted and i quoted will sort it out cuz his buddy took another man's work and used it to his delight!
wicked.
Well, considering the fan edit was giving people something they wanted that the studio wasn't providing, I don't see what's wrong with it. Let's say a band you really liked wouldn't let their songs be disturbed through legimate online music stores, you couldn't download the CD onto your computer, but wanted the music on your iPod, you know of a "illegimate" online music source that has the music you wanted, would you download it or not? It's the only way you can get this particular music, but it's not from a legimate source.
Angie Han said:At his Dynamite Entertainment panel, Tarantino was asked yet again for a status update on Kill Bill: The Whole Bloody Affair. Here’s what he said:
Quentin Tarantino said:What’s going on with that is originally back when Kill Bill was going to be one movie, I wrote an even longer anime sequence. So you see in the movie [O-Ren] kill her boss but then there was that long hair guy… The big sequence was her fighting that guy. I.G. [The Japanese Anime Studio] who did Ghost in the Shell said we can’t do that and finish it in time for your thing. And [plus] you can’t have a thirty-minute piece in your movie. I said okay. It was my favorite part but it was the part you could drop. So we dropped it and then later when I.G. heard we were talking about doing Kill Bill: The Whole Bloody Affair — they still had the script so without even being commissioned, they just did it and paid for it themselves. It’s really terrific. Anyway, The Weinstein Company and myself were talking about actually coming out with it sometime, not before the year is out, but within the next year with limited theatrical engagement as well.s well.
7 years to release this ? WoW.
The guy who killed O-Ren's father? Yeah, I don't know where that rumor came from. If it had been Bill, O-Ren would have probably killed him as soon as she saw him again.So much trouble Japanese animation companies go through , and Production IG would make it for free ? And the director would have nothing to say outside of seeing the final footage ? I smell Quentin's bullsh..
Also , that guy wasn't Bill. I knew i was right !!